RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WHO : Rejecting Africa as a guinea pig!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    did you read the apology? he apologised for the clumsy manner used to get his point across...not for the conclusion of his point...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Don1 View Post
      Only a Dummy would automatically trust the so-called World Health Organization and anything it propagates. WHO is an institution created by Babylon and led by Babylon lackeys in service of Babylon interests. The welfare of Africa and Africans anywhere is DEFINITELY NOT a priority for the WHO nor for Babylon. Quite the opposite.

      Babylon believes too many Black folks are living on their Planet Earth. Yes they believe Earth belongs to them - to do with as they wish. Additionally our birth rates are far higher than those of Europeans. They fear being overwhelmed by our numbers. i.e. Fear of A Black Planet. The plan is now and has always been for a GREAT CULLING of Africans. Any African not useful to service Babylon needs is expendable.

      The only question for Babylon is: How to perform the cull operations and minimize any perp tracing back to them.
      Without addressing this particular issue, in general, the WHO as part of the UN, is part and parcel of one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet. Ronald Reagan was saying that for years and nobody would listen. In truth and in fact its most corrupt years were during the Kofi Anan period. He was a total failure along with his criminal cabal. Of course, it is just one of the major criminal organizations the world should get rid of in short order and start over. The others would be the International Red Cross, the Clinton Foundation, FIFA, the IOC.All organizations controlled by criminals and the sons and daughters of criminals. Just look at the idiots and support staff who attend the UN's General Assembly, especially those from Africa. Total disgrace to black people.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
        reading comprehension is lacking in this age of facebook intellectuals:

        'We are in the process of thinking about a study in parallel in Africa.'

        you people can't be this stupid
        Ok so let me understand what he said and try to see what he really wants. Context means a lot also. He may have meant no harm but ine has to understand the response of Africans in the context of history. Europeans in general and the French in particular have been and still are probably the most rabid racists on the planet, so a healthy dose of skepticism is not unreasonable.
        Now, if you are going to do a placebo, random controlled double blind trial of a treatment, and I know because I have participated in many over the last 30 years, why wouldn't these idiots get matched subjects from the same population i.e. Europeans, Chinese etc where the treatment arms and the sham arms, from the same population only differ in degree of exposure i.e. subjects from the same population that wear masks and those who dont. Why do you need a parallel study in Africa?. I don't get. Maybe you can explain it to me Bricky.

        Comment


        • #19
          this is a well thought out post...maybe they want to run a parallel test on a population that has been exposed to BCG vaccines or any myriad of other cultural differences...

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
            this is a well thought out post...maybe they want to run a parallel test on a population that has been exposed to BCG vaccines or any myriad of other cultural differences...
            Possible. I would hate to think its pure racism and exploitation, but you always have to keep your eyes on the Europeans especially the French. Lets see how it pans put because learning from natural occurnces and unfortunate events and peoples is nothing new or limited to blacks/Africans. After all we know the ill effects of ionizing radiation from observing its effect on unfortunate Japanese civilians who were exposed in WW II. At the end ofbthe day, we have almost a billion black people in Africa and 50 plus countries controlled by clowns and dunces for over 60 postcolonial years and not one can design and carry out a single scientific vaccine study of its own. Talk about $#!t holes. Yes I did say that.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Reggaedoc View Post
              At the end of the day, we have almost a billion black people in Africa and 50 plus countries controlled by clowns and dunces for over 60 postcolonial years and not one can design and carry out a single scientific vaccine study of its own. Talk about $#!t holes. Yes I did say that.
              this is what we should be outraged about.....

              Comment


              • #22
                Ronald Reagan calling someone or an organization corrupt is laughable at best. The U.S. has never had a more corrupt, devious, conniving, calculating and immoral administration. Yes!!! the U.N. is corrupt, BUT Reagan attacked what his administration couldn't fully control, and supported what benefited or provided cover for his very corrupt administration.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
                  this is a well thought out post...maybe they want to run a parallel test on a population that has been exposed to BCG vaccines or any myriad of other cultural differences...

                  So why not the U.K,Australia or India? What's so special about Africa ?
                  THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                  "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                  "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by USAF View Post
                    Ronald Reagan calling someone or an organization corrupt is laughable at best. The U.S. has never had a more corrupt, devious, conniving, calculating and immoral administration. Yes!!! the U.N. is corrupt, BUT Reagan attacked what his administration couldn't fully control, and supported what benefited or provided cover for his very corrupt administration.
                    So what's your point. It is and was corrupt and he called them corrupt. Whats wrong with that?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      And he and his administration contributed to & supported the U.N.'s corruption, especially when it suited them.......Akin to a drug cartel leader profiting from the drug trade, with the help of law enforcement, BUT publicly talking about the corrupt law enforcement department facilitating the drug trade, when they seize one of his shipments.
                      Last edited by USAF; April 8, 2020, 07:33 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Sir X View Post
                        So why not the U.K,Australia or India? What's so special about Africa ?
                        There is nothing special about Africa or Africans. In fact I wouldnt even do testing in Africans especially poor Africans. To mount an immune response, the body has to be capable of mounting a response. With the level of protein malnourishment amongst Africans failure to produce immunoglobulins by Africans might not be the same in more nourished populations. There African leaders go again. You have the largest proportion of fertile land in the world and you have the most malnourished populations on the planet...and still think you special. Smh.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by USAF View Post
                          And he and his administration contributed to & supported the U.N.'s corruption, especially when it suited them.......Akin to a drug cartel leader profiting from the drug trade, but publicly talking about the corrupt law enforcement department facilitating the drug trade, when they seize one of his shipments.
                          You right. The US should have withdrawn funding from the UN and kicked them out of NY a long time ago. Build the UN HQ in Lagos or in Sicily since corruption seems to be their thing.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Why would they kick out the U.N. when they can use them to manipulate other countries and get what they want???.......Lagos or Sicily??? They can't come close to the U.S. level of corruption.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Ronald Reagan called African U.N. delegates 'MONKEYS' when he disapproved of their vote, and that's before he became president: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...chard-n1037171

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by USAF View Post
                                Why would they kick out the U.N. when they can use them to manipulate other countries and get what they want???.......Lagos or Sicily??? They can't come close to the U.S. level of corruption.
                                Well the USA can begin shedding the mantle of corruption by kicking out corrupt institutions like the UN. They started off well by prosecuting thiefing CONCACAF officials. They should have just kept on going.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X