The blood DNA evidence was overwhelming. I don't believe any planting at all took place. And even if it did occur it could not have happened to that magnitude in such a short space of time.
What about that lab tech? How does that affect anything?
If I remember correctly, the defence raised some ridiculous things right throughout the trial. No trial any where in the world demanded the kinds of things that this one did. If every trial had the same standards, absolutely no one would be convicted for any crime. And that's not to say that we shouldn't raise the standard all over, but if the DNA suggested that the probability it was indeed OJ's blood was 99.9975%, the lawyers would suggest that that was reasonable doubt!
There was a lot more evidence in the trial that incriminated OJ, blood evidence aside.
OJ is yet to explain the cut on his finger the morning after. He is yet to explain the high...low speed chase through LA. Where is he running to and why?
How about his shoeprint? Did he or did he not own those ugly shoes?
Like I said, the evidence from within the court trial and without suggest quite clearly to me that he was/is guilty!
What about that lab tech? How does that affect anything?
If I remember correctly, the defence raised some ridiculous things right throughout the trial. No trial any where in the world demanded the kinds of things that this one did. If every trial had the same standards, absolutely no one would be convicted for any crime. And that's not to say that we shouldn't raise the standard all over, but if the DNA suggested that the probability it was indeed OJ's blood was 99.9975%, the lawyers would suggest that that was reasonable doubt!
There was a lot more evidence in the trial that incriminated OJ, blood evidence aside.
OJ is yet to explain the cut on his finger the morning after. He is yet to explain the high...low speed chase through LA. Where is he running to and why?
How about his shoeprint? Did he or did he not own those ugly shoes?
Like I said, the evidence from within the court trial and without suggest quite clearly to me that he was/is guilty!
Comment