I really hope he does get his just rewards. In my view, there is not the smallest doubt that OJ hacked those people to death. He has remained pompous about it, even refusing to pay them a cent after being found guilty in a civil court.
I would like to see spend the rest of his life in prison.
I am surprised that he has been able to stay out of serious trouble for so long with so many wealthy people hating his guts and convinced he got away with murder.
"It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass
Mosiah. The JFJ will dis-own you!!! Where were you during the trial.....not the US? There are many more guilty people who should be in prison before OJ...
Yes I do think he got away with murder , but I also think that questioning police evidence collected by a racist detective who is on record saying he
beat and turtured black suspects in the past is not as ridiculous a defense as the media suggested that it was.
I always thought OJ was guilty mainly because he was a serial wife-beater and abuser for years before the actual crime.
"It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass
how's 35 million? isn't that the award n the civil trial? the book is selling well i hear 100,000 pre-sold?!! and the browns haven't bought any! is suh the goldman family big?
Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.Thomas Paine
For me, it is not so much about the court trial but reality. Anything can cause cases to be thrown out. I saw enuff in that trial and outside of that trial to know that he was guilty.
I really hope he does get his just rewards. In my view, there is not the smallest doubt that OJ hacked those people to death. He has remained pompous about it, even refusing to pay them a cent after being found guilty in a civil court.
I would like to see spend the rest of his life in prison.
Do you really feel comfortable convicting OJ for murder beyond reasonable doubt when the police admitting that took a blood sample from him, drove past the location where the the blood sample should have been dropped off and took it to the crime scene?
Do you feel comfortable convicting OJ for murder beyond reasonable doubt when the lab could not account for every CC of blood that was in the sample?
Do you remember how the lab tech was too sick to come to court to be questioned by the dream team but he was willing to give a recorded video deposition.
OJ may have been at that crime scene but I would not have convicted him because I believe that the Police gave themselve the opportunity to plant evidence at the scene and you cannot break the law in order to enforce it. I see reasonable doubt.
The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.
Comment