Now, it is the turn of the voter
Claude Robinson
Sunday, September 02, 2007
One of the longest and most unusual election campaigns in our history is, thankfully, over and the electorate will decide tomorrow whether to make a change or stay the course charted by three People's National Party (PNP) administrations since 1989.
Claude Robinson
Leaders of the governing PNP and the Opposition Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) have criss-crossed the country promising to do what has never been done before. They have issued glossy documents with commitments that voters are asked to take seriously.
Radio and television audiences have been bombarded with an 'air war' in which each party has attacked the other and poked fun at their opponents.
In their manifesto, the PNP promised to build on the economic platform built over the past 18 years in government and take Jamaica to "developed country status in this generation so that our people will enjoy all the benefits of living in a quality society".
Among other things, this meant achieving average GDP growth of 6-7 % a year over the next five years, according to PNP president and prime minister Portia Simpson Miller.
She also promised that the PNP would double per capita GDP within 10-12 years; reduce youth unemployment by 30%; improve the human development indicators by 5% per annum for health, education, social welfare and the environment over the next decade.
JLP leader Bruce Golding has stressed a new framework for good governance, about reducing the power of the executive and increasing the power of Parliament; establishing a platform for economic growth by making the country more business friendly; promised to reduce crime, improve education and offer free and good health care to everyone.
Both have promised to increase the size of the Police Force by 50 per cent in short order as part of a raft of measures to reduce violent crime.
The pollsters have also had their say. Mark Wignall (Sunday Observer) gave the JLP an 11-point lead; Bill Johnson (Daily Gleaner) had the JLP four points ahead; Don Anderson (Daily Observer) Thursday had the JLP trailing by a one per cent margin, thus placing the parties in a statistical dead heat.
Now that we have heard from those seeking office as well as polling and media pundits, it is now up to the voters and, if the 72% turnout by security and election day workers is any guide, then we could very well see a higher turnout than has been the case in recent elections.
Clearly, all these numbers cannot be right. However, when they are examined in relation to trends over the past several months, they do indicate that momentum is on the side of the JLP. However, while polls do have some predictive power, elections are only won after the ballots have been cast and counted.
Battleground seats
So while the parties will draw whatever positives they can from the poll numbers and other indicators, they know from experience that the only result that really matters is what happens tomorrow and that result depends a great deal on execution, on getting supporters to the polling stations.
Both sides will be paying particular attention to the large number of marginal constituencies where even a small swing can see several of these moving from one side to the other.
In 2002, when the PNP won 36 seats to 24 for the JLP, 19 constituencies were won by margins of five per cent or less. In many cases only a few hundred votes separated winner from loser. Of these marginal seats the PNP had nine and the JLP 10.
In addition, some constituencies won by comfortable majorities are now considered marginal by some experts because of local conditions, including candidate selection and boundary changes in parishes with significant population growth. St James and St Catherine were the parishes most affected by population shifts.
For example, the shift in numbers suggest that the JLP seat in St James East Central has become safer while another JLP seat, St James North Western held by deputy leader Horace Chang, has become competitive.
Based on the 2002 results and other factors the latest Don Anderson-CVM poll identified 18 constituencies as marginal. In 2002, the JLP won 10 of these seats while the PNP won 8.
Anderson's findings, released on CVM-TV last Wednesday, showed each party leading in nine of the marginal seats.
The PNP was leading in Portland West (Abe Dabdoub over Daryl Vaz); St Mary Western (Harry Douglas over Tarn Peralto); St Ann North West North West (Michael Whittingham over Othneil Lawrence); St Elizabeth South East (Norman Horne over Franklyn Witter); Clarendon North West (Richard Azan over Michael Stern); Clarendon North (Horace Dally over Laurie Broderick); St Andrew South East (Maxine Henry-Wilson over Joan Gordon Webley); St Andrew Eastern (Trevor Munroe over St Aubyn Bartlett); St Catherine North East (Phyllis Mitchell over Gregory Mair).
The JLP was leading in St Mary Western (Bobby Montague over Delano Franklyn); St James East Central (Edmund Bartlett over Donald Colomathi); St James West Central (Clive Mullings over Francis Tulloch); Hanover East (Barrington Gray over DK Duncan); St Elizabeth North West (JC Hutchinson over Ann-Marie Warburton); St Elizabeth South East (Christopher Tufton over Stanley Redwood); Manchester North East (Audley Shaw over Paul Lyn); Clarendon South East (Ruddy Spencer over Sean Barnswell) and St Andrew, West Rural, (Andrew Gallimore over Andrea Moore).
Interestingly, when the data is further analysed, it shows that the JLP lead in six of the constituencies where it is ahead is more than the poll's margin of error while there are only three such cases for the PNP.
So, if the momentum shown by the polls is valid and if it is maintained through to Election Day tomorrow then the JLP would seem to be in the stronger position to pick up more marginal seats than it drops.
On the other hand, if the PNP gets a last-minute surge from the final days of the campaign it could pick up enough of the marginal seats to cross the finish line ahead.
Hurricane Dean Factor
But, of course, there are several other factors that could influence the results besides the momentum, perceived or actual. These include the impact of the last week of the campaign, including advertising and the articulation of issues critical to the more independent voter who is not 'tribally' linked to either the PNP or the JLP.
The impact of Hurricane Dean on the personal lives and mental state of mind of voters in those constituencies that have been badly affected on the island's south coast as well as the response of governmental and political figures could also be a factor.
Before the hurricane, the JLP appeared to run a more structured and organised campaign, apparently drawing from the playbook the PNP had mastered over several decades.
This was evident in the advertising which stayed on message of attacking the prime minister's capability to manage the Government. They have also been hammering away at the 'change' perception, that is, the Government has grown tired and arrogant after 18 years.
While polls and anecdotes indicate that the JLP advertising campaign has been effective in attracting independent voters it could also have the effect of energising Mrs Simpson Miller's grassroots base who regards some of the ads as disrespectful.
On their part, the PNP advertising campaign, which was uncertain in the early stages, settled down in the last week attacking Mr Golding on the 'trust' factor and using the hurricane relief efforts to portray Mrs Simpson Miller as caring and compassionate.
Advertising apart, Dean can be a plus for the PNP if the Government is perceived as doing a good job in relief and recovery. It could also be a burden because people who do not have food and roof, and water and light are going to be angry at the authorities even if the government's overall performance has been creditable as, indeed, it has.
Another factor that could influence turnout is violence. In the last days of the campaign there have been a marked increase in the incidence of politically related violence and death and late Thursday it appeared that the commissioner of police would shut down campaign activities in the Corporate Area and St Catherine.
That would be welcome for most voters, I believe. We have been polled and canvassed and cajoled for too long. There is no new message to be heard. What's needed now is to have the election conducted in a peaceful manner.
The stakes are high and careers could be on the line. But, whatever the outcome in terms of which party forms the Government and which is asked to be the Opposition it is essential that the will of the people be accepted peacefully and democratically so that the country can quickly get back to the hard task of governing and managing a fragile society.
Somebody is going to lose tomorrow night. There should be recrimination and scapegoating. However we may feel we must accept the results of the election as a reflection of the will of the people. Those with new jobs to do should be allowed to get on with it and the others simply move on to life after an election.
kcr@cwjamaica.com
Claude Robinson
Sunday, September 02, 2007
One of the longest and most unusual election campaigns in our history is, thankfully, over and the electorate will decide tomorrow whether to make a change or stay the course charted by three People's National Party (PNP) administrations since 1989.
Claude Robinson
Leaders of the governing PNP and the Opposition Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) have criss-crossed the country promising to do what has never been done before. They have issued glossy documents with commitments that voters are asked to take seriously.
Radio and television audiences have been bombarded with an 'air war' in which each party has attacked the other and poked fun at their opponents.
In their manifesto, the PNP promised to build on the economic platform built over the past 18 years in government and take Jamaica to "developed country status in this generation so that our people will enjoy all the benefits of living in a quality society".
Among other things, this meant achieving average GDP growth of 6-7 % a year over the next five years, according to PNP president and prime minister Portia Simpson Miller.
She also promised that the PNP would double per capita GDP within 10-12 years; reduce youth unemployment by 30%; improve the human development indicators by 5% per annum for health, education, social welfare and the environment over the next decade.
JLP leader Bruce Golding has stressed a new framework for good governance, about reducing the power of the executive and increasing the power of Parliament; establishing a platform for economic growth by making the country more business friendly; promised to reduce crime, improve education and offer free and good health care to everyone.
Both have promised to increase the size of the Police Force by 50 per cent in short order as part of a raft of measures to reduce violent crime.
The pollsters have also had their say. Mark Wignall (Sunday Observer) gave the JLP an 11-point lead; Bill Johnson (Daily Gleaner) had the JLP four points ahead; Don Anderson (Daily Observer) Thursday had the JLP trailing by a one per cent margin, thus placing the parties in a statistical dead heat.
Now that we have heard from those seeking office as well as polling and media pundits, it is now up to the voters and, if the 72% turnout by security and election day workers is any guide, then we could very well see a higher turnout than has been the case in recent elections.
Clearly, all these numbers cannot be right. However, when they are examined in relation to trends over the past several months, they do indicate that momentum is on the side of the JLP. However, while polls do have some predictive power, elections are only won after the ballots have been cast and counted.
Battleground seats
So while the parties will draw whatever positives they can from the poll numbers and other indicators, they know from experience that the only result that really matters is what happens tomorrow and that result depends a great deal on execution, on getting supporters to the polling stations.
Both sides will be paying particular attention to the large number of marginal constituencies where even a small swing can see several of these moving from one side to the other.
In 2002, when the PNP won 36 seats to 24 for the JLP, 19 constituencies were won by margins of five per cent or less. In many cases only a few hundred votes separated winner from loser. Of these marginal seats the PNP had nine and the JLP 10.
In addition, some constituencies won by comfortable majorities are now considered marginal by some experts because of local conditions, including candidate selection and boundary changes in parishes with significant population growth. St James and St Catherine were the parishes most affected by population shifts.
For example, the shift in numbers suggest that the JLP seat in St James East Central has become safer while another JLP seat, St James North Western held by deputy leader Horace Chang, has become competitive.
Based on the 2002 results and other factors the latest Don Anderson-CVM poll identified 18 constituencies as marginal. In 2002, the JLP won 10 of these seats while the PNP won 8.
Anderson's findings, released on CVM-TV last Wednesday, showed each party leading in nine of the marginal seats.
The PNP was leading in Portland West (Abe Dabdoub over Daryl Vaz); St Mary Western (Harry Douglas over Tarn Peralto); St Ann North West North West (Michael Whittingham over Othneil Lawrence); St Elizabeth South East (Norman Horne over Franklyn Witter); Clarendon North West (Richard Azan over Michael Stern); Clarendon North (Horace Dally over Laurie Broderick); St Andrew South East (Maxine Henry-Wilson over Joan Gordon Webley); St Andrew Eastern (Trevor Munroe over St Aubyn Bartlett); St Catherine North East (Phyllis Mitchell over Gregory Mair).
The JLP was leading in St Mary Western (Bobby Montague over Delano Franklyn); St James East Central (Edmund Bartlett over Donald Colomathi); St James West Central (Clive Mullings over Francis Tulloch); Hanover East (Barrington Gray over DK Duncan); St Elizabeth North West (JC Hutchinson over Ann-Marie Warburton); St Elizabeth South East (Christopher Tufton over Stanley Redwood); Manchester North East (Audley Shaw over Paul Lyn); Clarendon South East (Ruddy Spencer over Sean Barnswell) and St Andrew, West Rural, (Andrew Gallimore over Andrea Moore).
Interestingly, when the data is further analysed, it shows that the JLP lead in six of the constituencies where it is ahead is more than the poll's margin of error while there are only three such cases for the PNP.
So, if the momentum shown by the polls is valid and if it is maintained through to Election Day tomorrow then the JLP would seem to be in the stronger position to pick up more marginal seats than it drops.
On the other hand, if the PNP gets a last-minute surge from the final days of the campaign it could pick up enough of the marginal seats to cross the finish line ahead.
Hurricane Dean Factor
But, of course, there are several other factors that could influence the results besides the momentum, perceived or actual. These include the impact of the last week of the campaign, including advertising and the articulation of issues critical to the more independent voter who is not 'tribally' linked to either the PNP or the JLP.
The impact of Hurricane Dean on the personal lives and mental state of mind of voters in those constituencies that have been badly affected on the island's south coast as well as the response of governmental and political figures could also be a factor.
Before the hurricane, the JLP appeared to run a more structured and organised campaign, apparently drawing from the playbook the PNP had mastered over several decades.
This was evident in the advertising which stayed on message of attacking the prime minister's capability to manage the Government. They have also been hammering away at the 'change' perception, that is, the Government has grown tired and arrogant after 18 years.
While polls and anecdotes indicate that the JLP advertising campaign has been effective in attracting independent voters it could also have the effect of energising Mrs Simpson Miller's grassroots base who regards some of the ads as disrespectful.
On their part, the PNP advertising campaign, which was uncertain in the early stages, settled down in the last week attacking Mr Golding on the 'trust' factor and using the hurricane relief efforts to portray Mrs Simpson Miller as caring and compassionate.
Advertising apart, Dean can be a plus for the PNP if the Government is perceived as doing a good job in relief and recovery. It could also be a burden because people who do not have food and roof, and water and light are going to be angry at the authorities even if the government's overall performance has been creditable as, indeed, it has.
Another factor that could influence turnout is violence. In the last days of the campaign there have been a marked increase in the incidence of politically related violence and death and late Thursday it appeared that the commissioner of police would shut down campaign activities in the Corporate Area and St Catherine.
That would be welcome for most voters, I believe. We have been polled and canvassed and cajoled for too long. There is no new message to be heard. What's needed now is to have the election conducted in a peaceful manner.
The stakes are high and careers could be on the line. But, whatever the outcome in terms of which party forms the Government and which is asked to be the Opposition it is essential that the will of the people be accepted peacefully and democratically so that the country can quickly get back to the hard task of governing and managing a fragile society.
Somebody is going to lose tomorrow night. There should be recrimination and scapegoating. However we may feel we must accept the results of the election as a reflection of the will of the people. Those with new jobs to do should be allowed to get on with it and the others simply move on to life after an election.
kcr@cwjamaica.com
Comment