RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

    <DIV id=printReady>

    Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years
    published: Wednesday | September 6, 2006
    <DIV class=KonaBody>

    Edmond Campbell, Senior News Coordinator


    ORANE

    Jamaica has, on average, recorded negative productivity levels for more than three decades, eroding some of the gains achieved during the 1950s and immediate post-Independence period, according to the head of one of the largest corporations in the island.

    Douglas Orane, chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Grace-Kennedy Limited, who made the observation, drew on a study conducted by Dr. Charles Douglas, executive director of the Jamaica Productivity Centre, which revealed that between 1970 and 2000, Jamaica's average annual labour productivity was -1.8 per cent.

    He was speaking yesterday at the National Productivity Awareness Week organised by the Ministry of Labour and Social Security and the Jamaica Productivity Centre at the Jamaica Pegasus in New Kingston.

    The study showed that, during the decade of the 1950s, the country's output per worker stood at an average annual rate of 8.4 per cent. This declined but remained positive at four per cent during the 1960s. However, the decade of the 1970s saw Jamaica's average annual labour productivity rate declining further to -0.4 per cent.

    Dr. Douglas' research showed that the annual productivity rate slipped again during the decade of the 1980s to -0.7 per cent. This poor performance remained unchanged in the 1990s.

    Leadership failed

    Suggesting that this was an indictment on the various political administrations of the country, Mr. Orane said this dismal performance meant that "the <SPAN class=kLink style="FONT-WEIGHT: 400; COLOR: black! important; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; POSITION: relative">leadership</SPAN> of our society has failed us and failed our people because all of our people want to be better off, but somehow we haven't been able to get our act together to get productivity moving in a way that other countries have done."

    Mr. Orane argued that the country should learn from the mistakes made and chart a new way forward instead of engaging in a blame game.

    He said that, since the year 2000, nothing has changed in terms of productivity output, noting that the country's economy has been growing at an average one per cent per annum while the population grew at a similar rate.

    "It means that the growth in productivity for Jamaica is just about zero over the last several years," he added.

    The GraceKennedy CEO said Jamaicans are increasingly migrating to countries where productivity is growing rapidly, including the United States, Canada and the Eastern Caribbean.

    Commenting on the impact of the poor productivity levels, Mr. Orane said this lack of growth has affected the standard of living of all Jamaicans.

    Turning to the industrial scene, Mr. Orane said several wage negotiations are not being pursued with <A class=kLink oncontextmenu="return false;" id=KonaLink1 &#111;nmouseover=adlinkMouseOver(event,this,1); style="POSITION: relative; TEXT-DECORATION: underline! important" &#111;nclick=adlinkMouseClick(event,this,1); &#111;nmouseout=adlinkMouseOut(event,this,1)
    Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

  • #2
    RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

    Are we as a people really serious about productivity?
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

    Comment


    • #3
      RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

      Well that is easily explained.. in the 70's the black man was freed from his shackles and made literate.

      Comment


      • #4
        RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

        Productivity ?

        We did enough of that during slavery.

        Now is about 'independence' and drinking milk.

        Wi a rule in Hell.. suh easy yuhself.

        Comment


        • #5
          RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

          How dem say di 80s were very productive?!?!


          BLACK LIVES MATTER

          Comment


          • #6
            RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

            Why yuh choose to embarrass yuhself? Afta unuh god effed up in the 70s yuh nuh think corrective measures had to take place first? Why yuh act like an unthinking person sometimes is beyond me .... I guess yuh need to fit in with the claffies.

            It took the demons 6 years to turn around 8 years of fockery by unuh god. By 87 the economy was growing 8%, 30,000 jobs was being created etc. Nobody said they were perfect ... but I guess unuh will find whatever reason to justify unuh mistakes. I tell unuh all the while fi listen to Real Business but as the General in a Few Good Men shouted, "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH.
            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

            Comment


            • #7
              RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

              8% huh?:hehe:


              BLACK LIVES MATTER

              Comment


              • #8
                RE: Productivity plunge - Study cites negative output over 30 years

                No .. mek mi give yuh something fi laugh bout. Omar's performance .. on the other hand yuh should want to cry.<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Wingdings; mso-ascii-font-family: Verdana; mso-hansi-font-family: Verdana; mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings"><SPAN style="mso-char-type: symbol; mso-symbol-font-family: Wingdings"></SPAN></SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o></SPAN>

                <TABLE class=MsoNormalTable style="MARGIN: auto auto auto 4.65pt; WIDTH: 96pt; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse; mso-padding-alt: 0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=128 border=0><TBODY><TR style="HEIGHT: 12.75pt; mso-yfti-irow: 0; mso-yfti-firstrow: yes"><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1993<o></o></SPAN></TD><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1.4<o></o></SPAN></TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 12.75pt; mso-yfti-irow: 1"><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1994<o></o></SPAN></TD><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1<o></o></SPAN></TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 12.75pt; mso-yfti-irow: 2"><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1995<o></o></SPAN></TD><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">0.7<o></o></SPAN></TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 12.75pt; mso-yfti-irow: 3"><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8; PADDING-RIGHT: 5.4pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; PADDING-LEFT: 5.4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; WIDTH: 48pt; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; HEIGHT: 12.75pt; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" vAlign=bottom noWrap width=64><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: right" align=right><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">1996<o><
                "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                Comment

                Working...
                X