Tweet
NFL PLAYERS CANCEL ISRAEL VISIT AFTER MINISTER ANNOUNCES INTENTION TO USE THEM AS ‘INFLUENCERS’
http://www.newsweek.com/nfl-players-...se-them-556000
http://www.newsweek.com/nfl-players-...se-them-556000
-
THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes. -
Pawn? Really? The PM visited Israel and some questioned why he was there, even try to spin it as if he was siding with Israel in the ongoing conflict. Now you used the word ...Pawn?Originally posted by Sir X View Post
Well ... do you have a problem with what was said below?
"The ambition is to sell Jamaica to the most eminent Israeli companies so that they can invest in Jamaica. That was my mission," said Lee Chin, who told the gathering that he was shocked at questions being raised in the press about the trip to Israel.
"I am thinking that if we need growth, we need to go everywhere in the world that can give us growth, and if Israel can give us growth, I don't care, I am going there.""Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article) -
I am pretty sure the NFL players had the same intention until they were more informed(BDS).In case you dont get it ,it was to sell the NFL merchandise,so that Israelis' would invest in it by purchsing products or the product,i.e a team.
You have a problem with it,specifically the similarities,that said ,its impossible to do business with Israel without being involved in the palestinian question,given BDS Lee Chin and Holness were Claffys'THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.Comment
Comment