Tweet
their broadcast stations are complicit when it comes to ignoring 'truths and facts'. The methods employed is all tied in how opinions are stated.
- One problem I observe is statements lending selves to different interpretations. Could it be that allows the talking head or talking heads to claim I did not say or meant a point of view that brings 'heat'?
- Another is no follow-up with facts after a candidate has presented an incomplete or false presentation.
E.g. When the candidates speak on a trade deal or immigration, where are the facts to give a balanced view? ...or a question on those facts to the candidate?
Example 1: Trade is always a 2-way street...where is the balance in presentation and what would be alternative outcomes?
Example 2: Mexican immigrants are drug dealers, etc? Where is recognition of Mexican immigrants are teachers, doctors, scientists, etc? ...their spending power/contribution to circulation of money in the economy or supporters of businesses?
- One problem I observe is statements lending selves to different interpretations. Could it be that allows the talking head or talking heads to claim I did not say or meant a point of view that brings 'heat'?
- Another is no follow-up with facts after a candidate has presented an incomplete or false presentation.
E.g. When the candidates speak on a trade deal or immigration, where are the facts to give a balanced view? ...or a question on those facts to the candidate?
Example 1: Trade is always a 2-way street...where is the balance in presentation and what would be alternative outcomes?
Example 2: Mexican immigrants are drug dealers, etc? Where is recognition of Mexican immigrants are teachers, doctors, scientists, etc? ...their spending power/contribution to circulation of money in the economy or supporters of businesses?
Comment