Why has Hillary's other emails started to appear at this

[Karl]

...time?

As said when there first appeared "deleted emails", there are no deleted emails. Once sent unless the internet goes dark everything is around somewhere!!! EVERYTHING!!!

So there could be a number of reasons why emails are being acknowledged being around...but before that, it is a good guess Hillary (whether via 'her people' or otherwise) knew the emails could be reproduced in a flash! ...so here goes:
1. Pre-emptive strike by .... and ... as "Trump's call for the Russians See the idea being floated here????? Russians may not necessarily, ...be Russians...Comprende?

...and of course it would be dereliction of duty by foreign interests if such emails are not already in each of the major foreign powers 'spy vault(s)'. So safe bet they have them....just as our good ole USA must have 'tons of stuff' circulated by foreign entities. (Note the German Chancellor's cuss hout ave Obama when Wikileaks 'put out there' US hacking of German government 'stuff' and her talk of diplomatic crisis but immediately thereafter photos appear of the noted Chancellor and our President 'arm in arm having a party'. Point is they all know it would be dereliction of duty if each was not keeping tabs on all others and thus the charade feigning hurt and anger to appease the masses.

2. The ground work is being laid for others...GOP, Dems and no GOP or Dems to be squeezed for ....?...benefits???????

--- A little bit on Trump's business dealings????? ...or Paul Ryan's...or....?????? Remember there is also 'private snooping' = 'snooping by 'so-called uninterested parties' (uninterested in politics) ????

Why now??????

[Gamma]

Karl it's obvious why. In case you haven't noticed there is a presidential campaign in full swing. Also the FBI notes turned over to congress will soon begin making an appearance

[Karl]

Karl it's obvious why. In case you haven't noticed there is a presidential campaign in full swing. Also the FBI notes turned over to congress will soon begin making an appearance

Selected notes? ...released to the public?
I mean...they have all the emails. Are any about dealings or matters that if released would be detrimental to US interests? ...or would they open thinking on what the actions of normal humans - i.e. *assisting those they favour - such that there is pressure for emails of others in the US Government's corridors of power? (Ripple effect across the world???). What if a reporter asked in an interview with Ryan (Speaker of the House) or Mitch McConnell or Trump if on examination their emails there would be no appearance or actual granting of favours?

NB: Remembering it is misstatements or ambiguity that in the US trips up politicians.

*assisting those favoured (friends, relatives, acquaintances or those friends, relatives, acquaintances of friends, relatives or acquaintances) = corruption...or, is it corruption or normal human behaviour? ...or, is it the size of benefit to the parties? or is it corruption if you are not the one gaining access?

Would a review of each person's correspondence show some 'granting of access' related to the individual's sphere of influence? ...the common labour within his circle...through to the super rich within his/her circle?

Is it reasonable to hold politicians to a higher standard than that of the rest of us who reasonable persons consider 'upright upstanding citizens'? ...expecting politicians to not behave as descent upright persons behave?

I put those 'thoughts' out there to cause thinking on, is it reasonable to expect release of Hillary's emails to move appreciable numbers of voters to abandon here and move to Trump?

Logical thought suggests support should be ........'s?