RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anti-Jamaica sentiments rising?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anti-Jamaica sentiments rising?

    published: Friday | July 13, 2007

    Dennie Quill, Contributor

    I am worried that Jamaica's influence in the world is on the decline. I am even more concerned that no one in power is doing anything about it.

    A generation ago Jamaica was at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement, this tiny country - its politicians and artists - stirred the conscience of the rest of the world against South Africa's ignoble regime. Our strident voice was heard during ACP negotiations, we impressed the world with our views on the Non-Aligned Movement and the New World Economic Order etc. Back then Jamaica had a positive influence in the world. Attitudes toward Jamaica and Jamaicans were also positive. Its nationals could travel to many places without restrictions.

    I accept that the world has changed since the terrorist attacks of September 11 and that countries are now forced to take steps to protect their borders and keep out undesirables. However, I must confess that I was taken aback, when I read that Costa Rica has become the latest country to impose visas restrictions on Jamaicans. We have witnessed over the last few years Great Britain, (the Mother Country) and former dependencies, Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos imposing visa restrictions on Jamaican nationals.

    Anti-Jamaican sentiments

    I can't agree with these decisions, but I understand that in some cases, action followed strong anti-Jamaican sentiments triggered by criminal activities carried out by Jamaicans in those countries. I have not heard of any Jamaicans creating havoc in Costa Rica. In any event, before visa requirements are imposed there is usually some discussion between the respective governments. I would hate to think that Jamaica has so lost its influence in the world that the Costa Rican foreign ministry did not discuss their difficulty with Jamaica before the move was made.

    It certainly is a prerogative of the Costa Rican Government to impose visa restrictions on foreigners, but when one considers the great historical connection between our two countries, and the lack of any criminal surge among Jamaicans, it is puzzling. I visited an Internet travel site to get a better understanding of which people the Costa Ricans aim to keep out. There is a list of 32 countries whose nationals do not require a visa for a 90-day stay in the country, Trinidad and Tobago is the only Caricom country on that list. Yet it includes South Korea, Hungary and Liechtenstein. So I have to conclude that while there is obvious admiration for the Jamaican culture in many parts of the world, there has been a fundamental shift in the way the world sees us.

    Visarequirements are interpreted as a statement about the relationship between countries and generally reflect the status a country enjoys within the international community of nations.

    The Henley Visa Restriction Index is a global ranking of countries according to the travel freedom enjoyed by their nationals. The top rank is held jointly by Denmark, Finland and the United States which means that their citizens can enter 130 countries without a visa. The highest ranking I saw for a Caribbean territory was St. Kitts/Nevis at 40 followed by Dominica at 46. I am still searching for Jamaica's ranking on that world list.

    An invitation

    Ironically, just as I was thinking about this sudden visa announcement by the Costa Rican government I opened the newspaper to see an invitation to: 'Do business with Costa Rican companies!' According to the ad: 'Come and explore the opportunities that the Free Trade agreement between CARICOM and Costa Rica will offer.' There is to be an exhibition of Costa Rican goods here in Jamaica next week. With visa restrictions in place, it is now easier to take the goods to us here for there is no requirement for Costa Ricans to acquire visas to come here. Once I visited Epcot Centre in Orlando and on one of their many educational rides, they allowed patrons to choose the ending to the story. I am thinking maybe I should ask readers to add the closing sentence to this column. Next week I will hopefully print some of your responses.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    "countries are now forced to take steps to protect their borders and keep out undesirables" Suh what? Are Jamaicans now seen as undesirables?

    Cho .. no big deal .. all we duh is lick dem back wid a visa restriction. Afterall Portia will get the last lick.

    How much time mi tell unuh saying we heading in the wrong direction at a high rate of speed? Yet comics like Karl call it progress and most a unuh a play blind and dumb? RIDDIM!!

    ping ping
    Cyaan say mi neva did a warn yuh
    ping ping
    Oh lord mi tell yuh
    ping ping
    Yow Yowwww
    (drumroll)
    Now trouble tek yuh lord a God pickney shut it ago fit yuh!
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

    Comment


    • #3
      First of all, Jamaica's leaders do not inspire people around the world to fight for a cause, ala Michael Manley.

      Our ghettos have become the breeding grounds for the export of undesirables, and those countries have every right to impose visa restrictions.
      Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #4
        Closing sentence:

        Upon some intro- and retro-spection it is abundandantly clear that I must have been living with my head stuck in the sand over the last decade or two. It does appear that many of my countrymen have been creating havoc not only here at home (what's the number killed so far this year, not to mention politics, but that's a humungous pandora's box that only the very brave would care to tackle) but even in territories abroad.

        Maybe Costa Rica has been influenced by George W Bush and is taking a diplomatic preemptive strike so to speak.

        Who can wrong dem?

        pr
        Peter R

        Comment


        • #5
          good article.

          Comment


          • #6
            Peter R!!!!

            damn YOU!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              How long now I am preaching this.

              X country have a right to impose visa, blah, blah, blah...

              I dont give a hoot about X country! All know is that as we get excluded more and more, the chances of us digging ourselves out of our hole get slimmer and slimmer.

              As the remitters get older, we will have less to replace them with. Even if we get serious about business and entrepreneurship, we will have extra costs and prejudice to deal with. A smart govt should be understanding this and working behind the scenes furiously to reverse these decisions. Better yet, preempt them and keep our access open. Of course in return we need to control crime and stem the flow of undesireables.

              Serious work to be done and we "playing".

              Comment

              Working...
              X