"Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)
i can see where this would be okay in certain instances...not in this one though...let's say you are a cop & get into a shootout with a suspect...you kill the suspect but also kill an innocent bystander in the process...nothing wrong with suing the dead suspects estate...
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.
so if a man a do an armed robbery...you are called to the scene as a police officer...he engages you in a shootout...you shoot & kill him & in the process kill an innocent bystander...who is to blame for the death of the innocent bystander?
Comment