300 years of atlantic Slave trade - Animated

[Sir X]

True but to say that slavery contribution is minimal or can be seperated from the development from any european empire, industrial revoution and capitalist shitstem is fooling oneselves, it is the fabric that western culture and current day capitalism is built on, as it was in Jamaica where one land owner can be seen as one of the riches man in europe in the 17 th century,reinvesting wealth and buying titles- Mayor and M.P to advance himself and empire to the 19th century where it can be linked to corporation (capitalist) like Debeers which is a diamond corporation finacied by the Rotchschild (The Rotchschild) used slaves as collateral from a slave owner to offer loans.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7c0f5...#axzz3eUGzC63Q

Debeers was set up by Ceceil Rohdes which had Rhodesia named after him ,he became a diamond trader in southern africa and enriched himself through the exploitation of blacks through that aparthate shitstem.

So as you see the link is clear.

https://lmarr7.wordpress.com/tag/n-m...ank-in-london/


Cheap labour huge profits ,massive investment in the industrail revolution,it cant be coincidence when slavery was dying these individuals set up corporations to continue the colonial exploitation of people of color,in other words they found a cheaper industrailse way to keep people in economic slavery without the physical chains or whips.They called it capitalism, now termed neoliberal consumerism.That fits their(babylon)moral ethos.Man affi work fi pay dem taxes.

[Islandman]

No they can't be separated in that era. Slavery was a great earner of revenue.

Where we differ is I don't believe capitalism is most efficient when it is based on exploitation. That approach will enrich a few but the economy as a whole is better served when people have more options. The modern prison industrial complex is an example of exploitation being used to enrich a few at the expense of the many. That is not free market capitalism.