RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Middle East Borders After Ottoman Defeat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Middle East Borders After Ottoman Defeat

    Would New Borders Mean Less Conflict in the Middle East?

    The region is living with the combustible legacy of states artificially carved from the remains of the Ottoman Empire.




    By Yaroslav Trofimov

    April 10, 2015 11:46 a.m. ET 138 COMMENTS

    Shortly after the end of World War I, the French and British prime ministers took a break from the hard business of redrawing the map of Europe to discuss the easier matter of where frontiers would run in the newly conquered Middle East.
    Two years earlier, in 1916, the two allies had agreed on their respective zones of influence in a secret pact—known as the Sykes-Picot agreement—for divvying up the region. But now the Ottoman Empire lay defeated, and the United Kingdom, having done most of the fighting against the Turks, felt that it had earned a juicier reward.
    “Tell me what you want,” France’s Georges Clemenceau said to Britain’s David Lloyd George as they strolled in the French embassy in London.
    “I want Mosul,” the British prime minister replied.
    “You shall have it. Anything else?” Clemenceau asked.


    read more
    [Reads like the playbook they used to cut up Africa among Euro powers]
    Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi
Working...
X