Golding, under whose portfolio the DBJ fell, sought last week to clarify an Observer report on the DBJ actions while he was prime minister, saying: "...There was no 'write-off' by the DBJ in March 2011. What was done was that it made provisions for the loss that it was making on this investment, which meant that the dividends that were due could no longer be taken to its profit and loss account. This is in keeping with international accounting standards and does not constitute a write-off or necessarily an intention to write off. In the case of loans by commercial banks, for example, it is a statutory requirement under section 17 of the Banking Act.
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/...ameni_17997022
Willi what you know about this banking Act?
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/...ameni_17997022
Willi what you know about this banking Act?
Comment