Krugman should be more skeptical about the new Cold War
By Mark Weisbrot, contributor
Share on facebook
107
Share on twitter
36
Share on google_plusone_share More Sharing Services
19
Share on email
12
Paul Krugman has been an important voice for sanity for many years, and so there was some disappointment with his Monday column on war among those who would like to see less insanity in U.S. foreign policy. Krugman is also one of the few columnists (or economists for that matter) who has, on several occasions, publicly acknowledged when he has made mistakes, and corrected them (in good Keynesian tradition, "when confronted with new evidence"). So I write with all sincerity in hoping that he will realize his mistake in this case.
In explaining the civil war in Ukraine, Krugman assumes that all the blame belongs to Russia, and in particular its president, Vladimir Putin.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...#ixzz3CM5wYQU2
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
By Mark Weisbrot, contributor
Share on facebook
107
Share on twitter
36
Share on google_plusone_share More Sharing Services
19
Share on email
12
Paul Krugman has been an important voice for sanity for many years, and so there was some disappointment with his Monday column on war among those who would like to see less insanity in U.S. foreign policy. Krugman is also one of the few columnists (or economists for that matter) who has, on several occasions, publicly acknowledged when he has made mistakes, and corrected them (in good Keynesian tradition, "when confronted with new evidence"). So I write with all sincerity in hoping that he will realize his mistake in this case.
In explaining the civil war in Ukraine, Krugman assumes that all the blame belongs to Russia, and in particular its president, Vladimir Putin.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...#ixzz3CM5wYQU2
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Comment