Aleister Crowley is credited with the gay revolution,in his manifesto he highlighted things needed to be done in order to further the agenda.There were sweeping changes in the US,the decriminalization of homosexuality,the targeting of the. music industry and our children.He declared they will have sex with our children.Nambla is a pioneer of sorts,it existed eons before LGBT etc,the B is for boys in the initialism,Nambla.
Isn't it peculiar the recourse for the molested youngster did not include the molester getting arrested?That is the undue protentionism subliminally reinforced in the book.
The book instructs male children if they choose to be women it is perfectly okay,and that whereas homosexuality has a history of being frowned on there are sweeping changes(be mindful of Crawley),and no mention of it being illegal.
I would not be surprised if abused children were exposed to pornography by their abusers...,instructing kids on using condoms and lubrication achieve the same goals...
You have been demonstrating the ills of misplaced priorities from the get go,you defend Gomes and not Osborne and now you are suggesting people opposing the indoctrination of our children are somehow siding whith the abusive uncle.
Okay,I will ckalk the blackboard,I am not against empowering youths from being victims of adult sexual predators,in the same vein I am against the indoctrination of the youths into the lifestyles of a grouo to which the predator belongs.
When the timing is right,the LGBT will revisit the case of the father reactions to stumbling on his child being abused.It will then ask if the father found a 18 year old female opposed to a male,would he had reacted the same way?
Those people are very calculated.
Comment