RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Punishment not the answer for young girls having consensual

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Punishment not the answer for young girls having consensual

    Punishment not the answer for young girls having consensual sex
    published: Sunday | May 27, 2007


    Gareth Manning, Sunday Gleaner Reporter

    Clarke

    Advocates have taken issue with a proposal by Children's Advocate Mary Clarke to have sexual offence laws amended so young girls who have consensual sex with males are held accountable under the law.

    The Children's Advocate said last week that it was unfair for boys alone to be charged under the law when some girls consent and encourage the sexual activity that takes place between the two.

    "Where the activity is forced, punish the men, yes, it is a violation of somebody's human right and somebody's body," she said. "But should those who have given consent, who have been part of the act, go free? I want us to think about that," Clarke told a group of Labour Ministry officials at the St. Paul's United Church last week. She said she was asking for the recommendation to be at least considered.

    But attorney-at-law Margarette Macaulay says the utterance by Clarke was unfortunate. While she agrees there are girls who often consent or even encourage sex with men and boys, there is no need to hold them responsible under law.

    "If (a girl) is in fact say 13 and when she dresses up she can pass for 18, and she does seduce somebody, there is obviously something wrong with her," said MaCaulay. "So how do you charge her with an offence? That can't be the answer."

    She says such girls need to be counselled and given therapy and provided with the necessary information on sex and reproductive health so they can make informed decisions instead of being locked up.

    Executive Director of the Women's Centre Foundation of Jamaica, Beryl Weir supports Macaulay's view to not apply punitive measures to consenting girls, but she is proposing that the laws be taught in schools.

    Punitive measures
    She insist there are boys and girls who do not understand that what they are doing is an offence under the law, so there needs to be more information in schools to educate those who will most likely become victims.
    "In all of this that we are doing, we have to be sure that we are not criminalising sexual activity, because sexual activity is a normal thing and it depends on the context in which it takes place, and the age of the persons who are having sex," she notes.

    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

  • #2
    Originally posted by Karl View Post
    Punishment not the answer for young girls having consensual sex
    published: Sunday | May 27, 2007

    Gareth Manning, Sunday Gleaner Reporter

    Clarke

    Advocates have taken issue with a proposal by Children's Advocate Mary Clarke to have sexual offence laws amended so young girls who have consensual sex with males are held accountable under the law.

    The Children's Advocate said last week that it was unfair for boys alone to be charged under the law when some girls consent and encourage the sexual activity that takes place between the two.
    Mary Clarke tries to be fair...but, she has lost it. Neither the boys nor the girls should be punished. Both need counseling.

    [/quote]

    There can be no disagreeement with the thought that adults - men and women - who lead kids into sexual intercouse and or engage in sexual relations with kids be punished...


    But attorney-at-law Margarette Macaulay...she agrees there are girls who often consent or even encourage sex with men and boys, there is no need to hold them responsible under law.

    "If (a girl) is in fact say 13 and when she dresses up she can pass for 18, and she does seduce somebody, there is obviously something wrong with her," said MaCaulay. "So how do you charge her with an offence? That can't be the answer."

    She says such girls need to be counselled and given therapy and provided with the necessary information on sex and reproductive health so they can make informed decisions instead of being locked up.
    What of the boys?
    ...and, why the counseling should only be on "reproductive health"? What about the matter of self-esteem, taking care of self and other allied areas?

    Executive Director of the Women's Centre Foundation of Jamaica,
    Beryl Weir supports Macaulay's view to not apply punitive measures to consenting girls, but she is proposing that the laws be taught in schools.
    Ignore the boys..huh?

    Fairness? Children's cause?

    Who are these people?

    Jamaica needs leaders!
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment

    Working...
    X