Tweet
Be careful of what? I put up facts and you counter with your opinion. You speak of things you do not know. What are you talking about on successful groups? When did these groups become successful?
A bit of history: After the civil war and the ending of chattel slavery; the majority of the USA was illiterate (whites and black). The Industrial revolution moved most whites around the city area into the middle class. Jim Crow on the other hand hindered blacks. Voting in America was and is important (to this day). Blacks were denied the right to vote via various schemes (grandfather clause) Blacks could not attend universities at will; this also extend to other minority groups. The Civil rights bill of 1964 addressed this issue. The voting rights act of 1965 finally allowed blacks and minorities to vote devoid of prejudice. Now given the above FACTS; it's up to you to explain how groups other than whites would succeed.
Another thing that you do is to rant that Garvey came to the states to give light to black Americans who were in darkness. I corrected you long ago that Garvey was not the first on Pan Africanism. Let me now tell you that BT Washington had heavy influence on Garvey. Garvey took sides with BT against Dubois due to this influence. Dubois had a point but it was not relevant at the time. What Dubois was saying (and this came principally from Aristotle)is that if you have to go to school because of someone or some entity (economy quickly comes to mindl) you are still a slave. Trust me this stands even today. BT said blacks have to delay Dubois perspective in order to build an economy for blacks else all is naught.
Dubois argument is akin to yours on football. You have a lot of talk but no money or means to generate the money to implement the talk.
I'm done, I have no more time to waste.
A bit of history: After the civil war and the ending of chattel slavery; the majority of the USA was illiterate (whites and black). The Industrial revolution moved most whites around the city area into the middle class. Jim Crow on the other hand hindered blacks. Voting in America was and is important (to this day). Blacks were denied the right to vote via various schemes (grandfather clause) Blacks could not attend universities at will; this also extend to other minority groups. The Civil rights bill of 1964 addressed this issue. The voting rights act of 1965 finally allowed blacks and minorities to vote devoid of prejudice. Now given the above FACTS; it's up to you to explain how groups other than whites would succeed.
Another thing that you do is to rant that Garvey came to the states to give light to black Americans who were in darkness. I corrected you long ago that Garvey was not the first on Pan Africanism. Let me now tell you that BT Washington had heavy influence on Garvey. Garvey took sides with BT against Dubois due to this influence. Dubois had a point but it was not relevant at the time. What Dubois was saying (and this came principally from Aristotle)is that if you have to go to school because of someone or some entity (economy quickly comes to mindl) you are still a slave. Trust me this stands even today. BT said blacks have to delay Dubois perspective in order to build an economy for blacks else all is naught.
Dubois argument is akin to yours on football. You have a lot of talk but no money or means to generate the money to implement the talk.
I'm done, I have no more time to waste.
Comment