Gamma - Explain 'No Case' in ATL trial

[Time]

In the end, she agreed with the prosecution that the Trust Deeds for the pension scheme were valid, and that consent was not given as required by the Deeds, but disagreed that the accused had lied, tried to cover up their action, or had intended to defraud. She ruled after a lengthy summation that the prosecution had not sufficently produced evidence against the three to establish fraud and dishonesty.

Hmm, if the consent letters were forged then isn't that a cover up?

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/...ssion_16795516

[Gamma]

usually with a fraud it is committed to benefit the perpetrator. in this instance even butch stewart himself would have benefitted from their actions. in other words it does not appear that it was something to entirely for their benefit.

it may be that it was something that they ought to have done and which they were entitled to do but did not do and were now trying to set the paperwork straight. it maybe incompetence or dereliction of duty but fraud has a certain definition....which thye would have struggled to prove.

[Time]

usually with a fraud it is committed to benefit the perpetrator. in this instance even butch stewart himself would have benefitted from their actions. in other words it does not appear that it was something to entirely for their benefit.

it may be that it was something that they ought to have done and which they were entitled to do but did not do and were now trying to set the paperwork straight. it maybe incompetence or dereliction of duty but fraud has a certain definition....which thye would have struggled to prove.

I see, case closed.