What a quick verdict!!! If I was betting

[Rockman]

Thanks,could that juror be the one that visited the defense attorney's office?
The prosecutor, by now,should have a feel for all the convicts,choose the weakest one to turn state witness,one has to assume a succesful appeal..

[Gamma]

I'm not so sure it is as cut and dried as that

[Rockman]

Elaborate me elder.

[Bricktop]

the main prosecution witness positively identified shane williams as terrence several times during his testimony...shane williams has never gone by the name terrence...that williams was found not guilty is instructive...

[Don1]

yuh still deh bout wid yuh yappin? yuh nuh tiyad fi get battabeat??
Mi spleen!!

[Gamma]

Very! The jury was paying attention. The others were positively identified. Terence probably skip town by now

[Gamma]

I think there is strong evidence for the conviction and the discrepancies in the evidence is not that significant. The strongest case on appeal I think would for the judge's summation.

[Mosiah]

My own feeling is that the jurors had made up their minds before the summation.

[Bricktop]

Goes to the credibility of the prosecutions main witness...he positively identified somebody who the jury determined wasn't there...he was lying

[Bricktop]

Gamma...how could the verdict be shared prior to it being accepted and announced in court...you ever see that yet?

[Mosiah]

Another grounds for appeal!

YAY!

Brickie, yuh did deh outta di court too?

[Gamma]

or mistaken. and the others? he positively identified 5 ... 4 of the 5 was correct. he's lying about the other 4?!!!

[Bricktop]

how do we know 4 of the 5 were correct?

[Gamma]

not sure what yuh mean?

it is not unusaul to ask if there is a verdict and what is the ratio. at that point they do not say what the verdict is....maybe i am misunderstanding you though clarify your question for me...

[Bricktop]

the 10-1 not guilty verdict was shared at the same time the jury returned to the courtroom the first time...they said they reached a 10-1 verdict but did not say whether it was guilty or not guilty...the judge sent them back because they hadn't deliberated for the requisite time...how could that have happened?