RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Portia nuh chat pon mike, at least not on the street!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Hortical View Post
    Sometimes these politicians like Portia figet dem work for the people.
    The cop was rude to push away the mic.
    He should have asked politely -
    Could you please allow the PM to continue moving forward?
    ...or...
    The PM has already said she will not answer questions on your question would you please remove yourself from our path and allow the PM to continue on her way?
    Hortical?

    Would the 'cop' be out of order to do the above?
    ...or should he just consider the reporter to be harassing the PM and have signaled to another member of the security detail to gently but firmly detain the reporter? ...or call for additional members of 'security' to block off/interpose selves between reporter and the PM?

    ...A - Two steps back quickly, PM...four steps forward and between PM and reporter, men?
    Last edited by Karl; November 22, 2013, 10:31 AM.
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #17
      Is the Reporter doing his Job ?

      Comment


      • #18
        Karl nuh worry yuhself. Case Try inna court an Judge an jury say reporter wrong. It was an ambush; reporter never really wanted to talk about the project. Matter of fact security should not have allowed him near the PM. He should have waited until the PM held a press conference. Big security breach (so jury say).

        P right because dem cyaan do that here. Reporter needs to be sent away on seminars.

        Comment


        • #19
          Well the PM has a security detail for a reason.Reporters were kept out of TG during crucial stages,discovery(Crucial investigative stage) was more likely there than here.
          Her refusal became the issue,she probably was right regarfing reason given....
          A cause a Portia.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Jawge View Post
            . Matter of fact security should not have allowed him near the PM. He should have waited until the PM held a press conference. Big security breach (so jury say).

            P right because dem cyaan do that here. Reporter needs to be sent away on seminars.
            Problem is Madam P doesn't do press conferences
            TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

            Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

            D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

            Comment


            • #21
              It seems you subcribe to the theory that a Queen 'comfort' is more important that poor policy...

              I posit that discomfort is a good tool to influence proper behaviour of public officials...

              Comment


              • #22
                Not surprised. That is the kind of verdict you will get when you have an uninformed jury.

                1) The reporter was ALREADY talking to the PM and she was happy to answer questions about the project. Hence talk of security not allowing reporter near the PM makes no sense.

                2) The PM does not hold press conferences. She does not think they are necessary. Maybe that will be lesson number 1 in her leadership seminars ?
                "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                Comment


                • #23
                  Having seen the video, here are my views on the incident.

                  Portia did not have to say anything about the mic being pushed in her face. She was standing right in front of him and speaking. Where does she expect the mic to be?!?! Anyway, that was what made one of her security officers, the dumb one in the dark suit, act the fool and push the reporter with uncalled for aggression. The other security officer held his ground and behaved as he should.

                  As for this lecture about the international media never being disrespectful, at no time was the reporter disrespectful. I don't think he needed to have continued questioning Portia about Azan. Portia had actually answered him moments before, saying the DPP ruled Azan did nothing criminal. For the reporter to start talking about what the opposition is saying was out of place for me.

                  At the end of the day, Portia needs to be a little less thin-skinned and her security officer in the dark suit needs some more training.


                  BLACK LIVES MATTER

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Jawge, you're making excuses for Portia when there is none. In her defence I would say that she did address his question , somewhat... However, she is the PM and why does she feel SHE should decide what should be asked of her? (within good reason of course).

                    Saying that what she wants to be reported is the project (and the reporter said he would report it) smacks to me of "policticking" at the newspapers expense.
                    Peter R

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      So sad!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Whose truth?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Good summary.

                          The reporter treatement was not a big deal, however Portia's avoidance was. Yes, she gave a stock answer, but if she did regualra press conferences, none of this would have come to pass.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Don1 View Post
                            Problem is Madam P doesn't do press conferences
                            ...that is another issue. Perhaps the issue that caused the reporter to lose his sense of 'right' and showed such poor behavior. We all 'lick out' at times when we are frustrated and upset. ...but it is not good to dive into anti-social behavior.
                            "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Willi View Post
                              Whose truth?
                              What kind of question is that?

                              The video will show what it shows! Matters not if someone suggests "do not believe your lying eyes"...what that video says is it!!!

                              (Added on 'date stamped edit') ---> ...so to answer you directly - The video's shown truth!
                              Last edited by Karl; November 26, 2013, 04:42 AM.
                              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                sad...

                                Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X