Unnu get excited bout Babylon defunct colonial era treaties

[Mosiah]

Unnu killing mi!

[Don1]

=Gamma;445602]what a piece of dandy shandy

Mi nuh play dat...mi mek assessments based on logic. But I've encountered MANY lawyers who do play the dandy shandy game though

1. .... not a presumptive tenant and not by non enforcement. what is "abandonment de jure" you mean the formal agreement? how is that "abandonment"? the issue of abandonment, does not arise as there are no competing rights to consider given the formal nature of the 1961 agreement, assuming that to be true of course.

Yes by de jure I mean by a legal agreement

There are tenant rights and landlord rights in any real estate lease agreement.
Some rights would be explicitly stated...others may apply by common law or practice
If a tenant ceases to occupy a property in any fashion for decades and the landlord in turn publicly changes the use of the property via a legal instrument without protest by the presumptive tenant.... a reasonable person can conclude that constitutes abandonment in fact.

And yes... That's merely my opinion

2. the exercise of dominion is ONLY of significant because the the US FORMALLY gave up the lease.

That's an opinion. I'm sure if it came to litigation the US opinion would be whatever best serves its purpose

I'm also sure that if Jamaica were well advised their position would be one of abandonment

It's up to a competent authority to decide the merits

if one arrives at the correct conclusion through a faulty premise, what is that called?

Not applicable...so... irrelevant

[Don1]

There is a high probability that you would be correct in that prediction given the Gleaner's performance

However it's definitely NOT a certainty

[Don1]

I predicted litigation ,not knowing the facts.

ok boss

[Gamma]

yeah bricktop ... what duh yuh, yuh must predict on thursday, that the gleaner would have come out on the preceding wednesday

[Gamma]

as good a try as could be expected in the circumstances.

[Don1]

Well one only try can't one?