Originally posted by Hortical
View Post
The following should be borne in mind -
a) We are very small in terms of land mass (area). - *No where to hide!
b) Ease of anyone acquiring guns would become more difficult...- for sportsmen and women necessary background checks and reporting to the authorities; inspection with photographic evidence on how stored...etc., etc.
c) the cops and other arms of the security forces would be less at risk of mistakenly shooting private citizens as all outside of the security forces observed with a firearm would be approached with extreme caution and that person or those persons would be at risk of being recipients of deadly force from the security forces...and other private citizens (i.e. possiblity of being attacked without notice and deadly force used - Such use of deadly force being 'Law protected' as being attacked in self-defense. - defense of person or society).
b) Would also mean persons who currently traffic in guns would themselves be at risk of the security forces and the private citizen using deadly force to protect the rest of society.
...i.e. let us look at an extreme - guns imported...the transportation of the guns away from point of entry would put those transporting same under threat of security-forces or the private citizens using deadly force against such person or persons...as they would be in possession of illegal firearm(s). ...menance to the society.
Point being you have a gun once (observed) with same you become legal BUD!
There must be zero tolerance for private citizen being in possession of gun.
*Currently gunmen are 'hiding in plain sight' as merely being observed with a gun does not mean the person with the gun is a criminal. That option of 'hiding in plain sight' must be (would be) removed.
Comment