RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Principal stop boy who killed his mom and shot up a school!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Principal stop boy who killed his mom and shot up a school!

    A principal and his gun

    by Wayne Laugesen
    This article was originally published in the Boulder Weekly, and is posted here by permission.
    Oct. 15, 1999. More from the Independence Institute on school attacks and armed resistance.


    Vice Principal Joel Myrick held his Colt .45 point blank to the high school boy's head. Last week, he told me what it was like. "I said 'why are you shooting my kids?' He said it was because nobody liked him and everything seemed hopeless," Myrick said. "Then I asked him his name. He said 'you know me, Mr. Myrick. Remember? I gave you a discount on your pizza delivery last week."
    The shooter was Luke Woodham. On that day in 1997, Woodham slit his mother's throat then grabbed a .30-30 lever action deer rifle. He packed the pockets of his trench coat with ammo and headed off to Pearl High School, in Pearl, Miss.
    The moment Myrick heard shots, he ran to his truck. He unlocked the door, removed his gun from its case, removed a round of bullets from another case, loaded the gun and went looking for the killer. "I've always kept a gun in the truck just in case something like this ever happened," said Myrick, who has since become Principal of Corinth High School, Corinth, Miss.
    Woodham knew cops would arrive before too long, so he was all business, no play. No talk of Jesus, just shooting and reloading, shooting and reloading. He shot until he heard sirens, and then ran to his car. His plan, authorities subsequently learned, was to drive to nearby Pearl Junior High School and shoot more kids before police could show up.

    But Myrick foiled that plan. He saw the killer fleeing the campus and positioned himself to point a gun at the windshield. Woodham, seeing the gun pointed at his head, crashed the car. Myrick approached the killer and confronted him. "Here was this monster killing kids in my school, and the minute I put a gun to his head he was a kid again," Myrick said.
    True humanitarian

    I've been intrigued by Myrick ever since that day. Most have never heard his name, because the mainstream press barely reported how the massacre was stopped. I've become more interested in Myrick's story with every subsequent mass murder. If only someone like Myrick had been at Columbine, I've pondered.
    A few months ago, Soldier of Fortune Publisher Bob Brown asked me if I had any suggestions as to whom should receive his magazine's Humanitarian Award of 1999. In the wake of Columbine, the answer seemed clear: Joel Myrick. Brown talked it over with his staff, gave it some thought and went with my choice. Brown and I will present Myrick with his award Friday in Las Vegas, at the annual Soldier of Fortune Convention and Expo.
    Myrick and his gun, no matter how one looks at it, saved lives. His actions saved the lives of waiting victims at a nearby junior high. He may have kept Woodham from shooting police, who would have arrived at the scene disoriented, without Myrick's home turf frame of reference. Arguably, Myrick and his gun even saved the life of the killer, who likely would have killed himself or been shot by SWAT cops after spilling more blood.
    Although Myrick saved lives, beyond question, some treat him as a leper. After the shootings, and the relatively peaceful ending to something that could have made Columbine pale in comparison, Myrick was in exile. He'd held a gun to a student's head, and his colleagues simply couldn't accept that.
    "Nobody wanted to dog me, but nobody wanted to side with me, either," Myrick says. "I felt like I was being betrayed by everybody."
    And that was Mississippi. This summer he studied at Harvard, where he'd been awarded a prestigious education fellowship. That's when uppity intolerance and mass stupidity took on new meaning for Myrick. "Once people found out my story, I got a lot of dirty looks and strange stares," Myrick said. "A few people confronted me."
    Myrick shouldn't feel bad. Only goofy losers gave Myrick funny looks, and such people never learn. Myrick's gun, and his ability and willingness to use it, saved lives plain and simple. Yet somehow, in the minds of the anti-intellectual gun control crowd, he's a bad man who did an immoral deed.
    By any sane, rational view, Myrick is a life-saving humanitarian. Even in my view, however, his heroic act will be marred by an asterisk in the annals of history. Despite the presence of this brave man, two students still died. Therefore, the footnote of far off history books will read something like this:
    *The late 20th Century was an era of crude polemics, in which some people believed hardware items, such as handguns, caused mass murders.
    Therefore, ineffective laws that reflected this view made it illegal for this legendary hero to have his gun on campus. The gun was in a truck, giving the killer valuable time as Myrick ran to retrieve it. In modern society, of course, responsible adults have better access to hardware than killers do.
    Arguing with a moron

    Myrick is as much of a hero as the law would allow. He was only seconds away from the shootings, yet the law had him far away from his gun. Federal law precludes anyone but a cop from having a weapon in or near a school. The modern spree of school shootings began sometime shortly after this law was enacted. In most places, state and local laws needlessly duplicate the federal law, serving only to accommodate political grandstanding.
    In Pearl, federal, state and local laws helped Luke Woodham shoot nine students. The deer rifle had to be reloaded after every shot. To hit nine students, Woodham needed time. The moments it took Myrick to reach his gun are what allowed Woodham to continue shooting and almost escape. Gun laws, and nothing else, gave Woodham that time.
    But talking to gun control advocates is like talking to five year-olds. Tell a five-year-old it's time for bed, and he'll say "No." Ask why not, and he'll say "because." Likewise, I've told a few gun control advocates about Myrick-telling them how he would have saved more kids had it not been for gun laws-and they've said "guns kill." Or, "we have too many guns." Or, "Woodham killed his victims with a gun."
    At which point I say, "Woodham violated several gun laws by having his gun on campus. The law did nothing to deter him, but plenty to deter the man who set out to stop the killings." To which a gun controller replied: "But guns kill."
    Sucked in and trapped by this bizarre logic, I attempted to address it. I said: "But Joel Myrick's gun didn't kill. Rather, it allowed children, including the deranged killer, to live."
    "Yeah, but all of these school shootings are done by guns," he told me.
    So I pounded my head against a wall. Politics and sociology are complex. But if any socio-political issue should be a simple, exact science, it's gun control. All honest modern studies show that gun control, in this culture, benefits criminals while leaving law-abiding victims defenseless.

    In his book More Guns Less Crime, Yale law professor John Lott ran the numbers every which way possible. He set out to write a book about guns being bad, and found that every gun law ever enacted in this country has resulted in more violent crime. I saw him on TV recently, debating a gun control advocate. Lott cited numbers and anecdotes. His opponent, in essence, said "but guns kill."
    Politics of nothing

    Right here in Boulder, a city of self-proclaimed enlightenment, city council members are hard at it trying to enact more gun control in the light of Columbine. Weird. Today in Boulder, it is absolutely illegal in every way, shape and form for a student to walk onto, or anywhere near a public school with a gun of any kind. Remove all state and local gun laws, and you still have a federal law that clearly forbids firearms of any kind within 100 yards of public schools.
    Anyone who shoots up any school, anywhere, is violating gun laws. So what does the Boulder City Council think up to address the very real concern of school massacres? Hey, let's pass some gun laws. Duh. "If we can save one life," it would be worth it, Councilman Dan Corson told the Daily Camera.
    If the city council manages to craft a gun law that isn't redundant to the Nth degree, it will serve only to make victims of future massacres more defenseless-guaranteed. Some politicians know this, but they don't care. What matters is how the public perceives the headlines their words garner. Guns kill. Duhhh. "Let's outlaw guns."
    Gun control was essential to Hitler and slave owners in the Old South. Proven fact: Gun control oppresses and kills. Proven fact #2: Responsible adults, such as Joel Myrick, save lives. When unencumbered by bizarre gun laws, they can save even more lives.
    So let's appeal to the Boulder City Council and the Boulder Valley School Board to explore ways of empowering law abiding adults. Perhaps it's time for the school district, with the full support of city hall, to establish a voluntary defensive weapons training course for teachers and administrators. Politicians who find a way to balance the firepower between forces of good and evil, by arming some teachers and administrators, might not get re-elected. But they might preclude a future disaster like Columbine, where SWAT teams sat helplessly in a parking lot while a teacher in the building prepared to fire at the shooters with a fire extinguisher.
    Have a good laugh at this idea, on me. Then ask yourself whether it's more important to be re-elected, or to cut short a future school massacre.
    We will never rid society of guns unless we eliminate the natural phenomenon of internal combustion. A gun is a crude instrument and nothing more than a controlled explosion. America is home to about 250 million of them, and they're with us to stay regardless of law.
    If you want to save lives, the answer is simple. Stop keeping guns from the hands of would-be heroes-the only people who obey gun laws. Joel Myrick had a gun, legally in his truck. Myrick and his gun saved lives, but they could have saved more. The lesson: Some guns save lives.
    The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.

  • #2
    Therefore the authorities should allow passengers on planes to pack their pistols to thwart would be hijackers?!?
    Peter R

    Comment


    • #3
      There will be more mass killings at schools/malls/movie theaters in the future etc. Most schools can not afford armed guards and people forget that the Virgina Tech killer used two handguns when he killed 33 people & wounded 17. History has shown knee jerk legislative actions has severe negative consequences. War on Drugs = war on innercity black people, with the disparity in sentences for crack vs powered cocaine. Powered cocaine the drug of choice in the white suburbs. Also, three strikes laws = life sentence in California etc.
      Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #4
        “War on Inner City People”

        Originally posted by Hortical View Post
        There will be more mass killings at schools/malls/movie theaters in the future etc. Most schools can not afford armed guards and people forget that the Virgina Tech killer used two handguns when he killed 33 people & wounded 17. History has shown knee jerk legislative actions has severe negative consequences. War on Drugs = war on innercity black people, with the disparity in sentences for crack vs powered cocaine. Powered cocaine the drug of choice in the white suburbs. Also, three strikes laws = life sentence in California etc.
        I understand your point, Hortical , and I mostly agree with what you’ve said here. However, with respect to the section I have highlighted, we have to realize that the war on inner-city drug supply and use saved many of the inhabitants from become literally extinct, and I mean extinct at the hands of black genocidal-types who assumed control of drug turfs!

        The movie “New Jack City” sums up the scenario in ghettoes in Chicago, LA, New York, etc. quite well. In addition, the numerous documentaries on drug culture in black communities reveal the extent to which black suppliers were destroying their own people!

        So, I am thankful for the war on crack and cocaine in particular in the inner city areas! And yes, you are correct about the “disparity in sentences” between black and white drug users. But when all is said and done, the increased focus by the authorities certainly saved the lives of countless black men, women and children!

        Comment


        • #5
          I agree with you on the gun laws. I am no advocte of the gun. I am upset however everytime an even like this happen, the subject of banning guns come up, a few high profile republicans change their mind and it a big scene, and the democrats try to pile on.

          The fustration is that no common sense legislation will happen and we will not try and find solutions to try and prevent this again. Just the same old same o.
          • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

          Comment


          • #6
            It is true black inner-cities in the 80s and early 90s had death rates comparable to some of the most dangerous places in the world. That is certainly no longer the case.

            I don't know if it is conclusive that the strict drug laws were the main reason the violence stopped though. It seems to me that places like NY city tried 10 things and something worked but they are not really sure what combination it was.

            Whatever it was, they did make an effort to address the crisis and succeeded, and that is where I have a problem with Hortical's nonchalant kind of approach ie "There will be more mass killings, yawn".

            Something MUST be done. Clearly nobody has all the answers because nobody really understands WHY American culture is producing more and more of these young men, but if finding a way to make it more difficult to get high powered weapons could be part of the answer, it should be on the table for discussion.It is not the whole answer for sure, something is SERIOUSLY wrong with these youths and they tend to fit a certain profile. But maybe there is a way to reduce the probability that they will get a gun in their hands when they snap.
            "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

            Comment


            • #7
              The politics of change , when innercity youth from the 70s to present, minorities were begging for tougher gun control , not a word , basically the call was society need their guns to protect themselves from the animals , this is the theme of the NRA, as it got more into the hands of white suburban kids who started massacaring their own , the call for gun control gets louder , parrallels ganja advocacy , as more white youth get criminalised the call to legalise gets louder.

              The war on drugs = the war on minorities , was it a success ? considering the cost in lives to our youth ? I would have to say when it began it was a disaster with draconian measures to criminalise and in some cases murder youth , both good and bad , case in point most recently the youth in the Bronx, where police invaded his house and shot him for a suspected bag of weed , Dorsman in Manhathan same thing a undercover DT approached him for a bag of weed and when he chased him away , he was shot dead and criminalised by Mayour Guiliani for having a past record as a teenager "he wasnt any angel" Aamadour Diallo .etc etc...the war on drugs has come to a realisation that criminalising and murdering its youth is an expensive failure, but only after they realised their own is being sacrificed .

              The war on drugs will take a new face in treatment more so than criminalising and murdering , it is the end result of the expensive failure.

              When will Jamaica reach that stage ?
              THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

              "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


              "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Historian View Post
                The movie “New Jack City” sums up the scenario in ghettoes in Chicago, LA, New York, etc. quite well. In addition, the numerous documentaries on drug culture in black communities reveal the extent to which black suppliers were destroying their own people!
                I am in support of cops going after drug lords who sell poison in the innercity. Not sure how you perceived my comments that I would not be in support of going after criminals.


                Woman jailed after filming 'stop and frisk' sues NYPD

                The NYPD has a systematic policy of harrassing black people in NY, that is the war on crime = war on poor black people. This is lazy police work, where in an effort to fight crime, that have harrassed and intimidated those who have no voices.

                According to the NYCLU, in 2011 NYPD officers conducted more than 14,000 police stops in Bedford-Stuyvesant. Nearly 92 percent of individuals stopped were black or Latino, and less than 4 percent of those stops resulted in an arrest, it said.

                http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters...sk__sues_NYPD/
                Last edited by Hortical; December 18, 2012, 12:25 PM.
                Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Islandman View Post
                  Whatever it was, they did make an effort to address the crisis and succeeded, and that is where I have a problem with Hortical's nonchalant kind of approach ie "There will be more mass killings, yawn".
                  Maybe you have missed my other comments on the matter, knee jerk legislative action will have no impact on these types of crimes unless mental health problems and those who are disturbed are prevented from acquiring firearms. People are grasping for solutions without understanding the totality of the problem. And yes, these crimes will continue for sure, and passing an assault weapons ban as proposed by Senator Feinstein, when the weapon used was NOT an assault weapon will have no impact on future crimes of this nature unless mental health is included in the discussions.
                  Last edited by Hortical; December 18, 2012, 12:25 PM.
                  Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I agree with you on the knee jerk reactions, people are upset and not thinking things through as usually happens after a major tragedy.

                    I'm not that focused on whether the guns used were technically assault weapons or not, they were clearly high powered weapons but as you have said (and I agree) that may not have mattered much anyway.

                    My main point is that some serious discussions need to take place and something done to address it. These are difficult problems to solve but I know for sure that there are many more homes in America with guns around and troubled, depressed young men nearby.
                    "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Other thoughts I have had on this matter is a ban on 30-round magazines to only 10-rounds, heavier trigger (similar the law for new handguns in some states). A heavier trigger that would require 10 pounds of pressure before firing so it would be hard to constantly squeeze the trigger in a rapid way to shoot multiple people, a listing of persons in the household who have mental health issues. At this time, only the person with a permit is screened for mental health problems. There should a restriction on someone owning a firearm if someone in the household is mentally impaired.
                      Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Don't know bout the war and drugs but US law enforcement has been winning the war on violent crime in major US cities for a while now. No question about that.

                        Of course the inner cities still have major problems of all kinds.
                        "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          yep they have been winning the war on voilent crimes in may cities. There are spots that are very troubling but many big cities are seen a lot less crimes.
                          • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            VERY good suggestions! Especially this one:

                            There should a restriction on someone owning a firearm if someone in the household is mentally impaired.
                            Can't see why anybody would want to oppose that.
                            "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Since 911, there has been a shift in winning the war on drugs,ironic ? BTW have they ever been loosing the war ? when you think of Iran Contra? ..one main reason political nationalism.

                              The whole train of thought about the war on drugs has changed since 911, it became more community sensitive ,in that they needed everyone to keep an eye and ear open for any threat , i.e terrorist (snitches) expolded, the war on drugs racked up on massive convictions post 911 and anyone who was rumored to be selling drugs was known as a fool or a snitch.The consequence is of course an increase in not only minority snitches but suburban snitches increase incarceration across the board.We are essential a police state ,hence the backlash by the far right of the fear of governmental intrusion.

                              Think about it lanza mother was a gun collector preparing for a doomsday scenario? an upper middlecalss lady getting 24 k a month in child support ?
                              THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                              "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                              "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X