Mi ask a clown for poll data and him come back wid dis

[Muadib]

<Of the 154 respondents who claimed that issues were critical, 70 per cent had tertiary education. This educated group listed corruption as the primary problem or issue.

"When asked why she put corruption ahead of economics, a medical doctor said that they were the same issue, "The corruption must be more serious, as that was money that we already had and it got wasted or stolen by the people we elected to manage our little much.">

Tertiary educated ?

Doctah ?

Ah wheh di !?

lol ! woiee !!.. mi belly !

[Don1]

<Of the 154 respondents who claimed that issues were critical, 70 per cent had tertiary education. This educated group listed corruption as the primary problem or issue.

"When asked why she put corruption ahead of economics, a medical doctor said that they were the same issue, "The corruption must be more serious, as that was money that we already had and it got wasted or stolen by the people we elected to manage our little much.">

Tertiary educated ?

Doctah ?

Ah wheh di !?

lol ! woiee !!.. mi belly !

LOL...nuh tell mi seh yuh dat daft

Which of the below is true?

A. A total of 154 personss were polled in the study

B. 70% of persons polled on all the primary reasons related to the JLP loss felt that corruption was the primary issue

C. Most of the persons polled in the study to determine reasons for the JLP loss had a tertiary education

D. None of A-C can be determined from the info presented... so Maudib's response is either weak-minded, delusional or disingenuous in misinterpreting the data to make it appear to persons observing that the study focused on persons with tertiary education... LOL

Only one answer makes sense

[Peter R]

seems a bit unclear

[Don1]

The data in the article is incomplete...but he chooses to see it as focused on tertiary level persons...then uses that to say it's not representative so he can undermine it.

However the prof makes general statements about the ENTIRE electorate which can only be reasonably made if the study was representative of the entire electorate.

Typical Muadib intellectual dishonesty ...well either that or he is unable to reason well

[Gamma]

well...you did ask a clown suh wha yuh expec'?!

[Don1]

well...you did ask a clown suh wha yuh expec'?!

yuh ave mi bummy

mi nuh know wedda mi fi laff ar cuss

[Muadib]

lol ! woiee !!

Chue dat..

[Gamma]

all i am saying ... is give peace chance!

if a man think him talking to a clown and ask a question then he should be surprised if he gets a clownish answer....

[Muadib]

mi look surprise ?