RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Migration Does Not Bring Happiness, Study Suggests

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Migration Does Not Bring Happiness, Study Suggests

    Migration Does Not Bring Happiness, Study Suggests

    ScienceDaily (Sep. 1, 2010) — The grass might not be greener on the other side of the border, a new study from the University of Leicester has found.


    Economic migrants traveling to different shores for greater income could be set for disappointment -- because the pursuit of wealth does not equate with happiness.
    Sociologist Dr David Bartram carried out the study: "Economic Migration and Happiness: Comparing Immigrants' and Natives' Happiness Gains from Income." It was published by Social Indicators Research online on 27th August and will be printed next year.
    He sought to establish whether those people who were motivated by higher incomes in a wealthy country actually gain greater happiness via migration. He also examined whether these economic migrants might have exaggerated expectations about what they will achieve and experience, such that there is some significant disappointment.
    Dr Bartram, of the Department of Sociology, said: "The study of happiness tells us that people generally do not gain greater happiness from earning higher incomes -- which suggests that migrants might be mistaken in believing that they will be better off if they can move to a wealthy country.
    "I also considered whether those who choose to migrate to a wealthy country are different from most people in this regard -- perhaps they do gain greater happiness from higher incomes. So, the research seeks to determine whether in general we should be pessimistic or optimistic about the consequences of migration for the migrants themselves.
    "The results suggest that economic migrants might well experience disappointment. Migrants do gain happiness from higher incomes, to a greater extent than natives -- but the relationship is weak even for migrants. In fact, it also works out that migrants are less happy than natives. The probable reason is that they expect to be happier by virtue of earning the greater incomes available in a wealthy country -- but they end up wanting even more after they get there: aspirations probably increase at least as much as incomes.
    "In short, even after an increase migrants find it difficult to feel satisfied with their incomes -- just like the rest of us.
    "Many of us are guilty of believing that money is more important for happiness than it is -- and this research suggests that migrants are not terribly different in this regard. Life as an immigrant in a wealthy country can be very hard."
    The research examined responses from 1400 people in the World Values Survey (existing survey data).
    Dr Bartram said that the research might also serve to allay some media fears and people's concerns about being "overrun" by immigrants: "The fact is, most people around the world do not want to move to a wealthy country like the UK: perhaps they understand that money is not the most important thing, that there would be a real price to pay in leaving one's family and community.
    "Perhaps the research could also help potential migrants, especially those who are attracted by wealthy-country income prospects, to develop a better understanding of what life as an immigrant in a wealthy country would really be like."

  • #2
    Oh, is that so?

    Originally posted by Exile View Post
    Dr Bartram said that the research might also serve to allay some media fears and people's concerns about being "overrun" by immigrants: "The fact is, most people around the world do not want to move to a wealthy country like the UK: perhaps they understand that money is not the most important thing, that there would be a real price to pay in leaving one's family and community.
    Is the above statement true? The use of the word “most” (and the impossibility of verifying this), of course, makes it hard to argue against this view.

    Also, I’m not sure what the practical purpose of this study is, because as sure as night follows day people will continue to migrate in large numbers to the more developed countries for various reasons.

    It would be nice to hear the view of forumites on this (remember, the world is not just the Caribbean, Latin America, West Africa and south-east Asia).

    Last edited by Historian; June 16, 2013, 01:59 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wonder how many persons migrate for
      The UK Can and USA, where to and why?

      Eg retirees to .... Say panama or colombia?

      Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

      Comment


      • #4
        Don't think they would be any unhappier after they migrate than staying put and living in poverty...maybe somewhat true for the middle class...

        Comment


        • #5
          Some Data (US only)

          Source: Migration Information Source, a project of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), Washington, D.C.
          (http://www.migrationinformation.org/...lay.cfm?ID=834 )


          Caribbean Immigrants in the United States

          By Kristen McCabe
          Migration Policy Institute


          A Jamaican restaurant in Richmond, VA. Almost 19 percent of Caribbean immigrants in the United States are from Jamaica.

          April 2011

          In 2009, the United States was home to 3.5 million immigrants from the Caribbean, who accounted for 9 percent of the total foreign-born population. More than 90 percent of these immigrants came from Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Haiti, and Trinidad and Tobago, and Cuban immigrants in particular have been among the top ten foreign-born groups in the United States each decade since 1970.

          While the number of Caribbean immigrants in the United States continues to increase, the population's rate of growth has slowed a bit more each decade since 1970, and the share of the foreign born that is from the Caribbean has gradually declined since 1990.

          Compared to other immigrant groups, the foreign born from the Caribbean are less likely to be new arrivals, tend to have higher levels of English-language proficiency, and become naturalized US citizens at higher rates. At the same time, Caribbean immigrants are more likely to be older than other immigrant groups and Caribbean men have lower rates of civilian labor force participation.

          This Spotlight focuses on Caribbean immigrants residing in the United States and examines the population's size, geographic distribution, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The data used are the most recent detailed data available and come from the US Census Bureau's 2009 American Community Survey (ACS), the 2000 Decennial Census (as well as earlier censuses), and the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Immigration Statistics.
          -------------------------------------------------------------------------

          The Caribbean-born population in the United States has increased more than 17-fold over the past 50 years.
          The number of Caribbean immigrants grew from 193,922 in 1960 to 3.5 million in 2009, representing a more than 17-fold increase. Currently, the foreign born from the Caribbean account for 9.0 percent of the total immigrant population, down from 9.5 percent as a share of the overall foreign born in 2000.

          Between 1970 and 2009, immigrants from the Dominican Republic contributed significantly to the rapid growth of the Caribbean-born population and accounted for 26.2 percent of the increase during that time period. Foreign born from Jamaica, Cuba, and Haiti also accounted for 20.9 percent, 19.8 percent, and 18.3 percent, respectively, of this growth over the past four decades.

          While the size of the Caribbean immigrant population continues to increase, the population's rate of growth has slowed each decade since 1970. The number of Caribbean born in the United States more than tripled from 1960 to 1970, but increased 86.4 percent from 1970 to 1980, 54.0 percent from 1980 to 1990, 52.3 percent from 1990 to 2000, and just 17.4 percent from 2000 to 2009.

          Comment


          • #6
            At least some get a false or true sense of security.
            • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Assasin View Post
              At least some get a false or true sense of security.
              LOL

              Please explain the benefit of a false sense of security
              TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

              Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

              D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

              Comment


              • #8
                Is where you dig this up??? From last year October?

                Comment


                • #9
                  you nuh see gunman a run pass you everyday.

                  Man nah tell you "hi bwoy mi wi shoot you" every so often.

                  You have a house and have 50 thousand dollar equity in it.

                  This and other maybe false(or it maybe true)sense of security.

                  Mi people come a foreign and die from the gun just the same and people lose their equity or hard earned money hence it maybe just a false sense (while some are more secured and hold on to what them have) and secure their an
                  their family's future.
                  • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X