RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Da breddah yah lost him mind

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Da breddah yah lost him mind

    Under fire, Attorney at law Bert Samuels is seeking to clarify controversial statements he made this morning as the hearing into the Trafigura matter continued in the Constitutional Court.

    This morning Samuels, who is the attorney for Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller told the court that if People’s National Party (PNP) executives in the Trafigura case were forced to testify in open court it could risk their personal safety.

    The PNP is seeking to challenge a Supreme Court order for several of its members to answer questions relating to the controversial $31 million donation by Trafigura in 2006.

    Dutch authorities want to question Simpson Miller, party chairman Robert Pickergill and senior members Phillip Paulwell and Colin Campbell about the donation to help in a criminal probe in Holland.

    This morning Samuels said, to make statements in open court could expose persons to the likelihood of reprisals if they give information against persons involved in criminal proceedings.

    Caroline Hay, who is representing the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions has objected to his statement and is to make submissions on the matter tomorrow.

    This evening Samuels sought to clarify that he was making a general statement and not necessarily one in relation to the PNP executives.

    Samuels also maintained that the matter should be heard in private as if the police were taking evidence that would be used in the case.

  • #2
    Woooiieee mi belly!

    Now is she claiming that the Dutch give a razz about jakan pollitrix??

    Attorney-at-law Deborah Martin is contending her clients Phillip Paulwell and Colin Campbell are only being asked to respond to questions in relation to the Trafigura probe because of politics.

    She was making her submission today before the Constitutional Court as the hearing continued into the application by the People’s National Party (PNP) which is seeking to challenge a Supreme Court order.

    Martin is representing PNP officials Paulwell and Campbell.

    She made reference to a letter by Bruce Golding, the then Leader of the Opposition, who wrote to the Dutch authorities asking them to investigate the $31 million donation to the PNP by Dutch company Trafigura Beheer in 2006.

    At the time of the donation Trafigura had an oil-lifting contract with the PNP administration which formed the government.

    Martin further argued that the November 2010 Supreme Court order to compel her clients to answer questions in relation to the Trafigura probe was an abuse of the process of the court.

    She said the order breached their constitutional rights and without the intervention of the court this will continue.

    Martin noted that her clients were being treated as suspects and that under Jamaican laws such persons have the right not to answer questions.

    She further argued that her clients have already made public statement about the Trafigura matter and they should not be called upon to give any further evidence.

    The Trafigura hearing in the Constitutional Court continues tomorrow.

    editorial@gleanerjm.com

    Comment


    • #3
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeeX_HX0hwI

      Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

      Comment


      • #4
        I thought the Comrades would be in an Africa Unite mode.. dem nuh read wheh Trafigura kill off how many Black People in di Motherland.. they should be lining up to testify !

        I guess Mannat tyad dem out..

        Comment


        • #5
          The argument of the attorney Bert have mi a way.
          He does not want his clients to testify because he fears reprisals (to them) from their exposing criminals to public scrutiny???? Do they not trust the police to protect them from reprisals? If not, what are they doing to improve the capabilities of said police?

          How is that a defense? Is it not against the law to see a crime and not report it? Are not the hon. MPs and Ministers OBLIGED to testify just on that basis alone?

          What is the use of a subpoena?

          What a prekeh...ongly in JamDung.

          Comment


          • #6
            It is said that too many cooks spoil the broth.

            But what do TOO MANY CROOKS DO
            Life is a system of half-truths and lies, opportunistic, convenient evasion.”
            - Langston Hughes

            Comment


            • #7
              willi for EVERY possible witness in a criminal matter they can raise this as to why they do not testify ..... and then what? if the prime minister can claim that she is not safe?!!!

              Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

              Comment


              • #8
                the defense can quote "mi nuh fraid a nuh......." LOL
                • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Exactly mi point.

                  Dem fi fire di lawyah and ask for a refund.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X