RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Police Politics?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Police Politics?

    By Gordon Robinson

    Don't hold your breath waiting for me to analyse the details of the Bicknell-Forbes-Vaz 'cass-cass'.

    I don't comment on the facts of cases pending before Jamaican courts. After a decision is made, I may critique. Otherwise, my comments are restricted to general legal principles. None arise in this molehill-to-mountain comedy.

    I'm concerned more with the police force's odd behaviour than the contested facts. One undisputed factual allegation is that johnny-on-the-spot Jubert Llewellyn, in a quandary, consulted former Commissioner Lucius Thomas for advice. Why? Were there no current senior officers he felt he could've consulted? Why didn't he consult the present commissioner?

    What's the protocol? Ought a former commissioner to 'advise' a current police sergeant on a pending issue without permission from the current commissioner?

    Since former Commissioner Thomas hasn't been charged with any offence, it must be the police have investigated and confirmed the propriety of his involvement. Did he ask permission? From whom?

    On August 22, The Gleaner reported Commissioner Ellington issued a statement the night before:

    "In a release last night, Commissioner Ellington said he was hoping for an early trial so that SSP Forbes will get an opportunity to have his say in court.

    "He also noted that SSP Forbes is a prominent member of the Jamaica Constabulary Force who commands tremendous respect from his colleagues and the general public.

    "However, Commissioner Ellington said he accepts the ruling of the director of public prosecutions and has every confidence in the justice system."

    Three things about this are significant. First, The Gleaner reported the release came from Commissioner Ellington himself. Second, the statement was issued before any charges were laid. Third, the statement is unambiguously slanted in SSP Forbes' favour. Why do I say this?

    1 The commissioner doesn't express hope that the law runs its course or that justice is done. His hope is "that SSP Forbes will get an opportunity to have his say in court". Every accused citizen has this opportunity. Why does he want to express this hope for one of three accused; one of two opposing police litigants?

    2 The commissioner ensured we got the message by continuing: "He also noted that SSP Forbes is a prominent member of the Jamaica Constabulary Force who commands tremendous respect from his colleagues and the general public." Again, why single out SSP Forbes for personal praise? Does Sergeant Llewellyn not command respect?

    3Finally, his grudging acceptance of "the ruling of the [DPP]", specifically prefaced by the word "however", makes it appear this commissioner is unhappy with that ruling.

    4The statement, as a whole, leads to the inescapable inference that the commissioner's "confidence in the justice system" is a confidence that SSP Forbes will be vindicated.

    Why should the commissioner be in such a hurry to publicly support his senior superintendent that he issues a statement in the dead of night BEFORE charges are laid?

    Coming, as this does, so soon after his unprofessional anxiety to label a PNP deputy mayor as a lotto scammer when subsequent events established his keystone kops had no evidence of that, we must begin to question this police commissioner's motives. Why did he feel it necessary to state that he has no interest in the matter? Nobody said he did.

    The prosecution says the commissioner was asked to give a statement. Once again, the police commissioner rushed to respond publicly:

    "In a statement this afternoon, the commissioner said he is aware of comments made ... by [Deputy DPP] Dirk Harrison concerning an outstanding statement ... .

    "But Commissioner Ellington says neither the office [of the DPP] nor the investigator in this matter has requested a statement from him."

    But the prosecutor isn't reported to have said who asked the commissioner for a statement. Why does the commissioner build up specific straw men and blow them down? Did anybody else ask him for a statement?

    And all this is compounded by the unprofessional show of solidarity for SSP Forbes, who is escorted to court by a band of police brethren, making it clear to the magistrate who they favour.

    Meanwhile, media workers are deluged with reasons why Sgt Llewellyn might carry malice against SSP Forbes. Are senior police officers trying to influence the case's outcome?

    Then, Sgt Llewellyn himself sat down with Police Federation representatives to give a video interview to The Gleaner. Although otherwise hyped, Llewellyn only said he was abiding by federation directives. Still, a material Crown witness oughn't to give interviews concerning pending court proceedings. This isn't justice.

    Peace and love.

    Gordon Robinson is an attorney-at-law. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com.

  • #2
    Wrong Signal, Cops

    By Gary Spaulding

    Prior to the bribery case in which Senior Superintendent of Police James Forbes has found himself enmeshed, he was widely regarded, by the media, wider public, and rank and file cops, as a professional of enviable integrity.

    Forbes' conduct, over the years, has commanded great admiration - as an effective law-enforcement officer from the days when he was chairman of the Police Federation, then head of the Constabulary Communication Network, until he was seconded to the Port Authority, and now as leader of the Community Safety and Security Branch.

    It was not surprising that in 2008, Forbes, who is remarkably approachable, was honoured by his peers at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston.

    Many Jamaicans, including the police commissioner, would want to be reassured that Forbes' good name is preserved.

    Forbes would likely have felt encouraged with the outpouring of support from his colleagues, mainly from the officer corps, at the Corporate Area Resident Magistrate's Court in Half-Way Tree last Wednesday.

    But there is a downside to this.

    It appears that many of the hard-working professionals in the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) who came out to show their support for Forbes missed the unfortunate signal that might have been conveyed to rank-and-file members, as well as the wider populace.

    In the troublingly distrusting atmosphere in which the police are forced to interface with the public, there is a growing perception that senior officers were too robust in backing their embattled colleague.

    Put bluntly, Forbes is in a legal muddle. He naturally expects and deserves the support of his peers.

    Unfortunately, many view the ugly spectacle of the amassing of uniformed officers on their way with Forbes as a bid at intimidation before the court - a place that, ironically, represents justice for all.

    Resident Magistrate Georgianna Fraser's assurance that "curry-favour" will not be countenanced may have fallen on deaf years, as the senior cadre made their presence felt.

    By their pronouncements, many cynical Jamaicans are wondering whether Sergeant Jubert Llewellyn, seemingly alone as the complainant, will be able to withstand the pressure, subtle and otherwise. Already, The Gleaner revealed last week that the sergeant and his family have had to undergo counselling as stress takes its toll.

    The senior officers, by their very presence and comments, may have signalled that the battle lines are drawn. Will the Police Federation follow suit?

    Unfortunately, in Jamaica, where the 'squaddie' mentality of police complicity and secrecy abounds, the officers may have failed to put enough thought into the impressions that may be formed by the public as they closed ranks around their beleaguered colleague.

    Public confidence, at the community or national level, is at the core of effective policing. Ironically, it was Forbes who was mandated to formulate strategies to close the widening rift between police and civilians. His work had become more difficult with the high number of killings by the police, which included mothers and daughters among the fatalities.

    The deaths of Cassava Piece resident 45-year-old Dianne Gordon and 16-year-old Vanessa Kirkland, Immaculate Conception High School student, continue to rankle Jamaicans.

    The JCF has acknowledged that its primary challenge is managing change. Currently, most of the police's energies and manpower are devoted to fighting serious crime, and providing response policing.

    The Police High Command states that while it is recognised that community policing is a strategic investment in promoting neighbourhood safety, it cannot be pursued at the expense of incidental crime solving.

    The challenge is to address the urgent and real needs of crime-fighting and emergency response, while effecting a culture shift through community policing.

    Despite the obvious challenges and man-power demands, there continue to be advances towards adopting community policing as an overall philosophy and strategy for the JCF and the people of Jamaica.

    The inevitable question is whether the attitudes of the senior police officers who not-so-subtly flexed their collective muscles are serving to foster the necessary change that will facilitate good relations between the man in the street and the man in red (or blue) seam.

    Gary Spaulding is a political and current affairs journalist. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com and gary.spaulding@gleanerjm.com.

    Comment


    • #3
      Mie nah seh nothing other than some man ah talk bout politics when the probability is that the political interference is the opposite of what they were positing. Comical.
      Be careful of what you surmise. It may just apply to you.

      Comment

      Working...
      X