http://www.guardian.co.tt/bussguardian3.html
AFter reading the above, and assuming it to be a reasonably well reasoned analysis, why was the original MOU even considered?
And isn't this one with Chavez on equally if not more risky ground?
pr
AFter reading the above, and assuming it to be a reasonably well reasoned analysis, why was the original MOU even considered?
And isn't this one with Chavez on equally if not more risky ground?
pr