RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

We make War so that we may have

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • We make War so that we may have

    ... Technology ??



    DARPA on a roll !

    https://www.ted.com/talks/regina_dug...ird_drone.html

  • #2
    I wonder what DARPA has going on poverty and hunger?

    Comment


    • #3
      ah who fah quote dat ???

      Sounds Quixotic..

      Comment


      • #4
        The advancement of a peaceful human civilization has nothing to do with war-making...

        Comment


        • #5
          Peaceful civilization ??

          lol ! is which Planet dem live pon ?

          "We live in a World of Walls..."

          Anyway is not really War.. is a surprise issue..

          <DARPA, the DoD innovation engine responsible for creating and preventing strategic surprise>

          Comment


          • #6
            "We make war that we may live in peace..." - Aristocrotle..

            Comment


            • #7
              When Hitler was a big up him chest.. what yuh di want wi duh... light up a big head spliff ?

              Nazis.. no Problem...

              Comment


              • #8
                What does that have to do with the advancement of human civilization?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Mutual Assured Destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender,[1] becoming thus a war that has no victory nor any armistice but only effective reciprocal destruction. It is based on the theory of deterrence according to which the deployment, and implicit menace of use, of strong weapons is essential to threaten the enemy in order to prevent the use by said-enemy of the same weapons against oneself. The strategy is effectively a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any rational incentive either to initiate a conflict or to disarm (presuming neither side considers self-destruction an acceptable outcome).


                  All wi haffi duh is mek sure Bearded McTurbanhead don't get profound wid dem Nuclear technology..

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    So without Hitler's threat and the response...human civilization would not have advanced?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      everything.. especially during the last century...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ask di Catholic Church.. draw a graph nuh.. before the World Wars and since the World Wars..

                        Unless yuh waan wi dash weh di Capitalism Mogel and run wid di Communism dream..

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          You are a soothsayer?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            So in the absence of war we would be cave dwellers?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              no but mi cyan read History book..

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X