RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

lazie should like this...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lazie should like this...

    Gov’t slashes public expenditure

    Published: Thursday January 19, 2012 | 4:33 pm

    The Finance Minister Dr Peter Phillips is to table in parliament soon, a Supplementary Budget reflecting a cut in public expenditure.

    The administration has just over two months to go before the current fiscal year ends on March 31.

    “We cannot live above our means any longer,” Phillips declared yesterday at a Mayberry Investment Forum at the Knutsford Court Hotel in New Kingston.

    However, according to the minister, the adjustments will be made in such a way to protect the most vulnerable in the society.

    He also promised that the Government will be careful in the way it goes about revising the Budget.

    “In the present circumstances, given the failings of the previous administration, maintenance of fiscal stability will involve expenditure cuts in the short term,” he said.

    “There will have to be expenditure cuts to compensate for declining revenues. We are determined not to squander the present opportunity to put things right once and for all.”

    However, Phillips acknowledged that expenditure cuts were not a sustainable medium to long term measure to finance the operations of the Government.

    "We will be required to identify opportunities to generate increased revenues, which must be in the context of the promotion and inducement of growth in the Jamaican economy," he emphasised.

    In April last year Audley Shaw, the finance minister at the time, tabled a $544.7-billion Budget for the 2011/12 Fiscal Year.

    But in August, Shaw tabled a revised spending plan reflecting an additional $2.1-billion net increase to the budget he presented in April.

    The adjustment pushed the Budget to $546.8 billion.

    The revision became necessary to account for a $4.4-billion increase in spending on the recurrent side and a $2.4 billion cut in capital expenditure.

    This was because revenues were coming in lower than projected while expenditure had to be increased to settle the protracted wage dispute with public sector workers.

    http://jamaica-gleaner.com/latest/article.php?id=34679
    'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'

  • #2
    .,.. why you think i would like that?
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

    Comment


    • #3
      i thought you were a proponent for fiscal discipline... that is why i said you would like the pending move by the govt... its not a partisan thing, its a jamaican ting...
      'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Baddaz View Post
        i thought you were a proponent for fiscal discipline... that is why i said you would like the pending move by the govt... its not a partisan thing, its a jamaican ting...
        I am for fiscal discipline, simply cutting expenditure isn't fiscal discipline. It appears "Reverse di ting" is a popular song. The last sup. estimates presented by the former fin. min had cuts to accommodate the public sector increase ... I recall one person mekking up noise about the cuts. Now dem get control .... reality set in.
        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

        Comment


        • #5
          he only likes it when a certain party does it.


          BLACK LIVES MATTER

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
            he only likes it when a certain party does it.
            .... you had nothing to say .....
            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

            Comment


            • #7
              apparantly, neither did you.


              BLACK LIVES MATTER

              Comment

              Working...
              X