Be that as it may they probably have one of the most unique forms of govt. globally... one where the common man (and woman) have a direct say in what the government does which is not seen in many other countries.
I had asked Willi about this a few weeks back but did not pursue his response... there is no harm in looking at what other jurisdictions do and copy what is successful if it can be applied to local situations... unuh jus a write off wha de man a say widout looking deeper... we jus wan hug Westminster which IMO is farcical especially when you watch the Parliamentary channel, whether here in TT, what I saw in Canada and from what I have seen of the British parliament itself...pure oneupmanship discourse and nothing of substance with a few exceptions.
I didn't know about the universal suffrage thing but at the same time I think that does not detract from the system itself, that just limited who could participate and as you point out they have rectified it as of 40 years ago.
I had asked Willi about this a few weeks back but did not pursue his response... there is no harm in looking at what other jurisdictions do and copy what is successful if it can be applied to local situations... unuh jus a write off wha de man a say widout looking deeper... we jus wan hug Westminster which IMO is farcical especially when you watch the Parliamentary channel, whether here in TT, what I saw in Canada and from what I have seen of the British parliament itself...pure oneupmanship discourse and nothing of substance with a few exceptions.
I didn't know about the universal suffrage thing but at the same time I think that does not detract from the system itself, that just limited who could participate and as you point out they have rectified it as of 40 years ago.
Comment