The questions were too long and vague...

[Exile]

...and therefore the debate was as boring as the question...need more incisive and direct questions.
1. Were you a part of Trafiguara decision making? Miller.
2. Did you support the ex-PM with his decisions on Tivoli/Mannat/Dudus? Holness.

[Baddaz]

i didn't see the entire debate but there was a question that the miller girl asked portia and i felt her tone was like a prosecutor rather than a journalist... not impressed with the people asking the questions... and there was no follow up...

still, not impressed with andrew... he has potential but appears a little too green (no pun)...

[Exile]

Why did he wear a blue tie?? Thought he would have donned (no pun) his colours.

[Exile]

Missed the first part too...damn streaming..shld hv gone straight to RJR.

[Baddaz]

he is trying to copy barack obama... and i am not joking... my professional training tells me that...

[Peter R]

No problems in my area with the streaming... but I had both RJR and TVJ lined up from the start.

[Sickko]

I am sure the first part is on You Chube already..where is Skeng anyways him gone sleep

[Jawge]

yup, Frankly

[Sir X]

Wha yuh say Xile di moderators screwed it up...lol....mi nuh rate dem.

[Exile]

Thought so too.. psychological move I guess...but could backfire...

[Exile]

Yes! Totally!

[Exile]

Plus some of the questions were OBVIOUSLY setup...were too person specific and literally setting up the answer ..

[Islandman]

I tend to agree with what Cliff is saying on Nationwide..Portia gave a creditable performance but expectations were low for her going in. Holness did not do as well as was expected but had a better grasp of the larger issues.

I disagree about the questions, yes or no type questions are not suitable for a debate. I do think both the time allowed to answer and the length of the debate should have been longer.

[Exile]

Of course I'm not expecting yes and no answers...but just a little more specific

[Jawge]

here we go again. aahhhhh the bigotry.