No...It doesn't take a scientist to see the bias...it takes a disappointed JLP supporter
If the reports reflect what actually happened...such reports even corroborated by JLP supporters and supposedly independent "analysts"...then a claim of slanted reportage or "bias" is unsupportable
The mere presence of reports significantly negative to one tribe is not evidence of bias... if the negative reports reflect objective, empirical truth
Brush up on your scientific method ..And
Hush... maybe your team will do better when the next debates camed
If the reports reflect what actually happened...such reports even corroborated by JLP supporters and supposedly independent "analysts"...then a claim of slanted reportage or "bias" is unsupportable
The mere presence of reports significantly negative to one tribe is not evidence of bias... if the negative reports reflect objective, empirical truth
Brush up on your scientific method ..And
Hush... maybe your team will do better when the next debates camed
Comment