Why Science Must Take Priority In Schools
Published: Tuesday | October 4, 2011
Michael A. Dingwall, Contributor
That story about our high-school students' lack of interest in the sciences should be a wake-up call to us, if we are a people serious about our future. However, what we need to understand is why these students think the sciences are not worth it.
In many ways, these students are just mirroring our society. While it can be argued that science subjects, including mathematics, are more difficult than non-science subjects, there are other reasons why the sciences are being shunned.
The truth of the matter is that in cultures like ours, science has never been a priority. Most students are shunning science largely because they don't see any future in it. Most of them cannot relate to science in any way. This is one of the major problems that I have with this culture of ours - our total lack of any serious interest in the sciences.
Look at how we treat entertainment as compared to science, for example. We have convinced ourselves that our niche is agriculture and entertainment. For us, science is something for the advanced societies. That is why we continue to see tourism, music, athletics, preaching and other forms of entertainment as major economic priorities.
Who to blame
Therefore, who can blame our high-school students when they opt to ignore the sciences? They are not fools. They have looked around and they see no future in cultures like ours for scientists. One doesn't need to know science to be an entertainer.
Other countries are experiencing similar challenges, but they are acting differently. The United States also recognises that the performance of their high-school students in the sciences is falling. However, unlike us, they understand the implications and have made the reversal of the decline a national priority. For them, leadership in the sciences will ensure continued global leadership.
Notice how these advance countries, unlike us, continue to invest heavily in the sciences? Despite very difficult economic challenges, they have not shelved programmes like the international space station. The world's largest particle-collision machine, many kilometres long, in Europe, also continues to get funding. For them, these are not expensive adventures, but programmes that are vital.
One reason why it is difficult to picture us, black people, and science together is that we haven't cultured ourselves to see science that way others have. For us, our primary role in this world is to provide entertainment. Who needs science for that?
What we fail to recognise, unlike others, is that unless we begin to make science and technology number one, we will always remain a backward people. We have been working with an economy for many decades that is entertainment-focused. Our present state of poverty and backwardness is testament to the nonsense of continuing to use this model.
The lack of interest by our students in the sciences is a cultural problem. Once we get the will to switch the priorities that we ascribe to entertainment and science, we will begin to see meaningful change.
Published: Tuesday | October 4, 2011
Michael A. Dingwall, Contributor
That story about our high-school students' lack of interest in the sciences should be a wake-up call to us, if we are a people serious about our future. However, what we need to understand is why these students think the sciences are not worth it.
In many ways, these students are just mirroring our society. While it can be argued that science subjects, including mathematics, are more difficult than non-science subjects, there are other reasons why the sciences are being shunned.
The truth of the matter is that in cultures like ours, science has never been a priority. Most students are shunning science largely because they don't see any future in it. Most of them cannot relate to science in any way. This is one of the major problems that I have with this culture of ours - our total lack of any serious interest in the sciences.
Look at how we treat entertainment as compared to science, for example. We have convinced ourselves that our niche is agriculture and entertainment. For us, science is something for the advanced societies. That is why we continue to see tourism, music, athletics, preaching and other forms of entertainment as major economic priorities.
Who to blame
Therefore, who can blame our high-school students when they opt to ignore the sciences? They are not fools. They have looked around and they see no future in cultures like ours for scientists. One doesn't need to know science to be an entertainer.
Other countries are experiencing similar challenges, but they are acting differently. The United States also recognises that the performance of their high-school students in the sciences is falling. However, unlike us, they understand the implications and have made the reversal of the decline a national priority. For them, leadership in the sciences will ensure continued global leadership.
Notice how these advance countries, unlike us, continue to invest heavily in the sciences? Despite very difficult economic challenges, they have not shelved programmes like the international space station. The world's largest particle-collision machine, many kilometres long, in Europe, also continues to get funding. For them, these are not expensive adventures, but programmes that are vital.
One reason why it is difficult to picture us, black people, and science together is that we haven't cultured ourselves to see science that way others have. For us, our primary role in this world is to provide entertainment. Who needs science for that?
What we fail to recognise, unlike others, is that unless we begin to make science and technology number one, we will always remain a backward people. We have been working with an economy for many decades that is entertainment-focused. Our present state of poverty and backwardness is testament to the nonsense of continuing to use this model.
The lack of interest by our students in the sciences is a cultural problem. Once we get the will to switch the priorities that we ascribe to entertainment and science, we will begin to see meaningful change.
Comment