RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Karl defend yourself.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Karl defend yourself.

    FINSAC interfered with sale of Thermo-Plastics assets - Downer

    Published: Friday | June 3, 2011 0 Comments


    Richard Downer, chartered accountant and former receiver for Thermo-Plastics, testifies at the FINSAC enquiry on Monday, May 30, 2011. - JIS Photo


    The disposal of Thermo-Plastics Jamaica was delayed at least three times on the request of FINSAC Limited which wanted to give a state-owned investment bank the opportunity to compete for the asset, according to testimony by former receiver Richard Downer on Tuesday. But Downer said that he could not confirm whether there was political interference in the sale of Thermo-Plastics and its subsidiary, Plas Pak Limited.

    "It was a matter of opinion," he told the FINSAC enquiry under cross-examination by attorney Anthony Levy, representing Thermo-Plastics and Plas Pak's former boss, Jean Marie Desulme.

    Downer, a chartered accountant and former partner of PriceWaterhouseCoopers Jamaica, admitted that he was summoned to a meeting with two cabinet ministers, Horace Clarke and Paul Roberton, as well as National Workers Union executive and Portmore Councillor Owen Saunderson, to discuss the future of the companies in January 1999 at Jamaica House.

    The chartered accountant denied that the meeting was chaired by former Prime Minister P.J Patterson.

    He said the meeting was convened by then FINSAC managing director, Patrick Hylton, and that he informed those present of a January 15 deadline for bids to purchase both companies, as well as the fact that he was not sure whether the National Investment Bank of Jamaica (NIBJ) was going ahead with its proposal to purchase the debenture from FINSAC.

    Downer said that he was asked by Hylton to extend the deadline for the disposal of the companies to February 28, to accommodate NIBJ's interest.

    He extended the deadline to March 3, but NIBJ still failed to meet it.

    He was eventually instructed by Hylton to suspend the sale of the companies, to allow FINSAC to review an offer from NIBJ, the former receiver said.

    Downer denied that he did not advertise the assets for sale abroad because he wanted to confine the bids. He said the receivership lasted three and a half years because FINSAC was not prepared to sell to the bidders that he submitted, although offers were coming in from 1998.

    "The length of the receivership, during which our fees continued to be incurred, was due to the fact that the then debenture holders, FINSAC, instructed me, on several widely separate occasions, to facilitate the efforts of the NIBJ to buy the debentures or the businesses, and also not to entertain bids at various times that were coincident with these efforts," he said.

    He said that this required him to continue the receivership instead of selling the business, "as I could have, at various times, to Omni Industries.

    In the interim, we had to keep the businesses operating as going concerns, so as to get the best possible price in a sale. It was not until 2001 that the secured creditor instructed me to accept an offer from NIBJ," he said.

    By the time NIBJ assumed the assets, the receiver's fees had cost the companies some J$111 million.

    Downer's responses triggered an appeal from Levy for the commission to subpoena former Prime Minister P.J. Patterson to appear at the enquiry.

    Commission chairman Worrick Bogle said they would reconsider the commission's earlier rejection of the request.

    The enquiry resumes Tuesday, June 7.
    Last edited by Karl; June 3, 2011, 04:09 PM.
    • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

  • #2
    ...and the result of the sale?

    When the fees and other charges by the receiver were deducted did the sellers' lose or gain? What was the outcome? ..was it a gain by FINSAC? ...and less of a loss by the former owners?

    Sass: Yuh luv half a di story eenh?

    What would be the situation of Omni Industries bought? ...and what was the situation when the assets were evetually sold?

    The full stroy, boss! Why did FINSAC entertain NIBJ's bid...better business sense?
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Karl View Post
      Why did FINSAC entertain NIBJ's bid?
      Because both FINSAC & NIBJ had common Directors? Karl you are a pirate...

      Comment


      • #4
        the profit was not a consideration here and neither was the plight of the owner.

        This is coming from the reciever set up by FINSAC so what is half story??? The fact is the sale was postposed just because FINSAC wanted it to, to get their preferred buyer. If you notice the price was not even a consideration as far as Downer was concerned.
        • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Assasin View Post
          the profit was not a consideration here and neither was the plight of the owner.

          This is coming from the reciever set up by FINSAC so what is half story??? The fact is the sale was postposed just because FINSAC wanted it to, to get their preferred buyer. If you notice the price was not even a consideration as far as Downer was concerned.
          Yuh playing hop-scotch!
          "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

          Comment


          • #6
            The point is was it a better deal?
            "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Karl View Post
              The point is was it a better deal?
              If OMNI had the better offer + the delays cost the company an additional $111 mil, what would you conclude?

              Comment


              • #8
                Not me playing hop-sctoch it is FINSAC while people life and income was at steak.
                • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                Comment

                Working...
                X