Don't revise 'night noise' law
Published: Friday | April 1, 2011 0 Comments
Patrons dance at a party in St Andrew.
THE EDITOR, Sir:
I write with concern about the move to 'review' the Noise Abatement Act. It would appear that by the sounding off of various parties that the idea that "entertainment sessions are allowed to go until midnight on weekdays and until 2 a.m. on weekends" is to be revised.
Clearly, those that want to revise the law are either the partygoers, the promoters or those who have never been kept awake till 6 a.m. with a sound system rattling their windows, and had to run for cover with their children from the vile filth emanating from the speaker boxes.
Will our legislators consider the volume and rumbling earthquake-simulated bass of sound systems? Will they consider the already- disadvantaged children who live in or near to these communities who have to get up and go to school in the morning? Will they consider the children who live well beyond the 100 metres stated in the current act that can't sleep until midnight? Will they consider the intrusive sound systems and the party organisers that don't even live in a community and have no problem keeping it awake all night?
Will they consider the fact that most violent occurrences happen after 2 a.m. because the 'good liquor', mixed with exhaustion, is a trigger?
The goodly Minister Nelson asks what better way to relax "than to sit down and listen to some good music and drink some good liquor?" But why should everyone else in a 100-metre radius be forced to listen to that music too.
Allowing slackness
But I suppose the current wisdom is, enough people are breaking the law anyway, so let's just change it to accommodate them. At the same time, why don't we look at carrying concealed weapons, reckless driving, and corruption in politics. How about changing the law for child molesters and drug dealers? Both are certainly quite prevalent to warrant a revision or two. Let's just change the laws to accommodate them all while we are at it.
The current Noise Abatement Act is fair, and is the only protection that non-partying citizens of this country have. Of course, that is when the police decide to step in.
I am, etc.,
ROBIN BASTON
robinb@cwjamaica.com
Published: Friday | April 1, 2011 0 Comments
Patrons dance at a party in St Andrew.
THE EDITOR, Sir:
I write with concern about the move to 'review' the Noise Abatement Act. It would appear that by the sounding off of various parties that the idea that "entertainment sessions are allowed to go until midnight on weekdays and until 2 a.m. on weekends" is to be revised.
Clearly, those that want to revise the law are either the partygoers, the promoters or those who have never been kept awake till 6 a.m. with a sound system rattling their windows, and had to run for cover with their children from the vile filth emanating from the speaker boxes.
Will our legislators consider the volume and rumbling earthquake-simulated bass of sound systems? Will they consider the already- disadvantaged children who live in or near to these communities who have to get up and go to school in the morning? Will they consider the children who live well beyond the 100 metres stated in the current act that can't sleep until midnight? Will they consider the intrusive sound systems and the party organisers that don't even live in a community and have no problem keeping it awake all night?
Will they consider the fact that most violent occurrences happen after 2 a.m. because the 'good liquor', mixed with exhaustion, is a trigger?
The goodly Minister Nelson asks what better way to relax "than to sit down and listen to some good music and drink some good liquor?" But why should everyone else in a 100-metre radius be forced to listen to that music too.
Allowing slackness
But I suppose the current wisdom is, enough people are breaking the law anyway, so let's just change it to accommodate them. At the same time, why don't we look at carrying concealed weapons, reckless driving, and corruption in politics. How about changing the law for child molesters and drug dealers? Both are certainly quite prevalent to warrant a revision or two. Let's just change the laws to accommodate them all while we are at it.
The current Noise Abatement Act is fair, and is the only protection that non-partying citizens of this country have. Of course, that is when the police decide to step in.
I am, etc.,
ROBIN BASTON
robinb@cwjamaica.com
Comment