Tweet
<H1>The telephone records proved beyond a shadow that AG statement that she spoke to the army man from the DPP Office via phone around 10:00am was not a truthfull statement.
</H1>A call was found at 2:04pm but that is irrelevant since no one sought to place the Army man at the DPP at 2:00pm. The Witnesses and the army man all agree that he was at the DPP around 4pm. The DPP could have called the AG at 2:04pm for any reason. What important is no one had place the army man there around 2:00pm, not the AG, not the witnesses, not the army man himself.
The telephone records also proved that no one from the DPP called the AG at 4pm. The Army man said that he was there around 4:00pm, the three witnesses agree. The army man said that he never spoke to the AG by phone, the witness disagree, they said that he did. The absence of a phone record 4pm indicates that the 4pm call was never made.
Dorothy Lightbourne clears phone call issue
2011-03-07 12:56:03 |
with audio | (3 Comments)
Justice Minister Dorothy Lighbourne on the stand at the Manatt-Dudus commission of enquiry- Norman Grindley/Chief Photographer
Justice Minister Dorothy Lightbourne this morning sought to clarify the time she received a call from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to enquire about the status of the Christopher 'Dudus' Coke extradition request at the Manatt-Dudus commission of enquiry.
At least three witnesses have told the commission that the call was placed to Lightbourne’s office around 4 pm on August 25, 2009.
But in her statement and in her testimony last week Lightbourne said she received the call about 10 o’clock in the morning.
However, this morning Lightbourne cited independent phone records which she said she felt compelled to report.
However, she did not change her statement that she spoke with the legal officer of the Jamaica Defence Force, Lieutenant Colonel Patrick Cole.
Colonel Patrick Cole has stated that he did not speak with Lightbourne when the call was placed to her office from the DPP’s office on August 25, 2009
</H1>A call was found at 2:04pm but that is irrelevant since no one sought to place the Army man at the DPP at 2:00pm. The Witnesses and the army man all agree that he was at the DPP around 4pm. The DPP could have called the AG at 2:04pm for any reason. What important is no one had place the army man there around 2:00pm, not the AG, not the witnesses, not the army man himself.
The telephone records also proved that no one from the DPP called the AG at 4pm. The Army man said that he was there around 4:00pm, the three witnesses agree. The army man said that he never spoke to the AG by phone, the witness disagree, they said that he did. The absence of a phone record 4pm indicates that the 4pm call was never made.
Dorothy Lightbourne clears phone call issue
2011-03-07 12:56:03 |
with audio | (3 Comments) Justice Minister Dorothy Lighbourne on the stand at the Manatt-Dudus commission of enquiry- Norman Grindley/Chief Photographer
Justice Minister Dorothy Lightbourne this morning sought to clarify the time she received a call from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to enquire about the status of the Christopher 'Dudus' Coke extradition request at the Manatt-Dudus commission of enquiry.
At least three witnesses have told the commission that the call was placed to Lightbourne’s office around 4 pm on August 25, 2009.
But in her statement and in her testimony last week Lightbourne said she received the call about 10 o’clock in the morning.
However, this morning Lightbourne cited independent phone records which she said she felt compelled to report.
However, she did not change her statement that she spoke with the legal officer of the Jamaica Defence Force, Lieutenant Colonel Patrick Cole.
Colonel Patrick Cole has stated that he did not speak with Lightbourne when the call was placed to her office from the DPP’s office on August 25, 2009