AG had singed on requeste similiar to Dudus phone tapping

[Time]

my only comment is that IF previous extraditions were authorised on illegal evidence, would that prevent the issue from being raised now, regardless of the perceived motive....in thers words if this was merely overlooked and the "suddenly realised" this oversight should they move to correct it or continue with that knowledge?

Also IF they always knew it was illegal and decide to raise it now, does it make the evidence any more legal?

my opinion is that issue is not really too important, what is important is the behaviour of the jlp/government/bruce in respect of the hiring of manatt phelps ...

Yes learned one, if they 'suddenly realised" that its illegal then its 'excusable' for the government to challenge it govt to govt or in court what is not ok is the wolf in sheep clothing 'behaviour of the jlp/government/bruce in respect of the hiring of manatt phelps.'