Prime Minister explains Brady’s involvement to Manatt Commis

[Muadib]

Does the rest of the Household concur ?

[Don1]

I'll check

[Muadib]

You do that..

lol !

[Mosiah]

what did One Liad apologise for then?

[Muadib]

certainly not for lying...

[Jawge]

careful don't come out so early. The movie is not over, this is just intermission (changing reels). Believe me it's not over yet.

I keep telling you guys that children should not play in adults' game.

[Mosiah]

well, he would be lying there too!

[Muadib]

Wheh yuh ah guh migrate to after next General Election ?

[Mosiah]

mi migrate arready! yuh never 'ear?

mi cyaan live inna Labourite country!

[Muadib]

Nicely dun.. don't figget fi send di remittance every month doh !

[Karl]

Careful, Bruce!

[Muadib]

Yuh haffi explain dah one deh fi mi.. wha Bruce and Popeye have in common ?

[Rudi]

Gelding practices an inept sophistry....The problem for One Liad is:

1. Who did Manatt ACT for... the JLP or the GOJ? ... the contractual relationship will be established by the ACTIONS of the parties...yes or no?

2. If Manatt was acting for the JLP as One Liad claims... why was their correspondence with GOJ officials?

3. Where is their communication with JLP officials who purportedly they represented?

4. Why were they attending meetings as part of official GOJ delegations?

5. Why did MPP register with State as a foreign agent representing GOJ??

6. What business does a political party have in a state to state extradition proceeding? What is the JLP interest in that if not to "protect" one of their power brokers..ie Dudus?


What Gelding has tried to establish is what the CIA calls "plausible deniability"... covering the dirty tracks of his corruption of government and protection of an international criminal.

One Liad has blurred the definition of where the GOJ stops and the JLP begins... indeed there is no division of the 2 entities in this case...a further corruption of an already rotten shytstem

An inveterate liar... One Liad.....lol

As I've said before #6 above is the one the spinners have a hard time dealing with. Hence they never address it.

[Don1]

As I've said before #6 above is the one the spinners have a hard time dealing with. Hence they never address it.

dem still ah try get peeple fi look fi lettahead... Rear Admiral Red Herring..lol

[Lazie]

Gelding practices an inept sophistry....The problem for One Liad is:

1. Who did Manatt ACT for... the JLP or the GOJ? ... the contractual relationship will be established by the ACTIONS of the parties...yes or no?

2. If Manatt was acting for the JLP as One Liad claims... why was their correspondence with GOJ officials?

3. Where is their communication with JLP officials who purportedly they represented?

4. Why were they attending meetings as part of official GOJ delegations?

5. Why did MPP register with State as a foreign agent representing GOJ??

6. What business does a political party have in a state to state extradition proceeding? What is the JLP interest in that if not to "protect" one of their power brokers..ie Dudus?


What Gelding has tried to establish is what the CIA calls "plausible deniability"... covering the dirty tracks of his corruption of government and protection of an international criminal.

One Liad has blurred the definition of where the GOJ stops and the JLP begins... indeed there is no division of the 2 entities in this case...a further corruption of an already rotten shytstem

An inveterate liar... One Liad.....lol

Is see yuh trying with the 50 cent impersonation. I guess its same way the flat earthers asked ridiculous questions to convince themselves the earth was flat.

You for one was insisting the gov't was trying to get Dudus off ... well based on what is coming out thus far, you were way off base. Kinda like how you were way off when you predicted that the gov't would mess up the IMF deal. At some point you need to adopt the concept of silence is golden.