RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sport and the people's money

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sport and the people's money

    Sport and the people's money

    Published: Sunday | December 5, 2010 Comments 0


    Jamaica Football Federation president, Captain Horace Burrell.


    Tony Becca, ON THE BOUNDARY

    In 1994, Horace Burrell, the president of the Jamaica Football Federation (JFF), attended a meeting of the National Sports Council at Jamaica House. He implored the gathering to financially support the efforts of the footballers to go to the World Cup finals of 1998, and at the end of his presentation, when the prime minister asked us what we thought, all of us, almost to a man, said no way. The feeling was that it would be a waste of money. The consensus was that the footballers did not possess the required standard of play or the necessary behaviour to make it to the World Cup.

    The PM, Honourable P.J. Patterson, then proceeded to talk to us. He spoke for about 10 minutes. He talked to us about sport and the people, told us about the hopes and dreams of poor people, and then he asked us if we were willing to stand by and do nothing, and by doing so, rob these poor boys of their dreams.

    He asked us again what we thought about helping the footballers, and we said yes - all of us.

    The country spent, and sent, and spent, it paid a coach a king's ransom, it asked the other sport associations to tighten their belts while the country concentrated on football, and everything else stopped.

    Jamaica made it to the World Cup finals, and the country was ecstatic.
    That was 1998, and today Jamaica is no different. It is still the same poor country trying to do what others are doing.

    Jamaicans, those in sport, want Jamaica to spend what Jamaica does not have on sport, they want Jamaica to spend what America spends on sports, what other countries spend on sports, and that just does not seem right.

    Although sport is sport, and should be the same everywhere, Jamaica and America are two different countries, at least in size and money.

    Except when one is investing, to spend what you do not have on anything is foolish, and unless, or until, Jamaica start investing in sport, it is foolish to spend so much money in sport at the expense of the necessities of the society.

    For years now, Jamaicans have been talking about investing in sport, about sport and tourism and what have you. Since the Beijing Olympics and the Berlin World Championships, the talk has become more pronounced but, like so many things Jamaicans, it is all talk.

    Nothing has happened, and until something happens, until Jamaica starts to make money from sport, Jamaica cannot justify, to its army of poor Jamaicans, spending so much money on sport.

    Jamaicans are talented, many of them, and there is no doubt about that.

    Jamaica, however, cannot afford to develop that talent and neglect the rest of the country, the vast majority of its people, people who are poor and suffering from lack of education, health, food, housing, roads, security etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

    What good does it do Jamaica if a few people win gold medals, a team wins a football championship, a team wins a netball tournament, or a cricket team wins a tournament and more than half the people are suffering.

    Every time a team is going away the cry is that they have no money and the Jamaican people are asked to support them, and every time Jamaica wins some thing, somebody in the government, whichever government, gets up and promise all kinds of things.

    structured system
    What is even worse is to hear a government representative saying every time a Jamaican, who chooses to live elsewhere, who lives fairly well, who is enjoying a sport foreign to Jamaica and which is expensive to play, does something reasonably well that the country is behind him or her, that it will do everything possible to support him or her, and asking the Sports Development Foundation to get involved, to organise a structured system to assist him or her.

    Obviously, it means that that the country will spend poor people's money to support his or her pastime.

    Recently, the nation's footballers told the football federation, on the eve of a match, that they would not lace up their boots until they were paid a total per diem of US$1,200 (up from US$300), and unless they were offered 80 per cent (up from 50 per cent) of the prize money if they won the tournament.

    They also refused to train on the day preceding the match.
    According to the players, the protest was not about the money but it was one based on principle.

    no player is indispensable
    The protest, according to the players, was "on behalf of those who previously represented the nation and ended up with not much to show for it, and the younger local players who are perhaps badly in need of the income".

    The president of the federation, Horace Burrell, met with the players before the start of the match, paid them the added amount of money, out of his own pocket, so it is said, and said that he did it because he did not want the country to be embarrassed.

    Burrell's gesture may have been good on the day, and it may have saved Jamaica some embarrassment. By paying up, however, he bowed to a stick-up, and you can bet your bottom dollar it will happen again, and again, and again.

    The players should have known of the financial situation of the JFF, they should have known what the JFF can afford, and they should have decided to play or not to play from the start.

    None of them, not one of them, is indispensable.

    Apart from the fact that 80 per cent of the prize money is outrageous, apart from the fact that JFF has other responsibilities to fund, it is always bad business to pay what you do not have, and to go and to behave in that way before a game is unforgivable.

    It was nothing more than blackmail.

    It would be interesting to know what the footballers did with the added money.

    Did they hand over any of it to the past players who were short-changed years ago? Did they hand it over to the younger players who are so badly in need of it? Or did they simply stick it in their pockets?
    Last edited by Karl; December 6, 2010, 07:30 AM.
    Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
    Che Guevara.

  • #2
    Scrap the program then...

    Comment


    • #3
      While I agree in large parts to many sections of this column there are a few things that I think many who are criticsing the players have not considered.

      The majority if not all of the players who are on national teams have no other source of income so for anyone to say to them, go and play for the honour of you country have no clue what is going on.

      The JFF has a lot to answer for and Burrell should pay out a lot more than that cause he has made a lot more than that from jamaica's football for his personal use.

      The players were not told until the day before they were leaving that the JFF had no money to send them and then it wa swhen they got to the tournamnet they were told about the short fall in their promised pay.

      Questions are why did the JFF make the promises if they knew long before hand they did not have the money?

      We have seen this scenario far too often now...

      Additionally I find Luton's comments about US$1200 being pocket money arrogant and out of order. yes he might be making a lot more than that and can afford to give that away but how many on this team can make that boast?
      Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
      Che Guevara.

      Comment


      • #4
        O.K Mr Becca , its the players fault...this crap about playing for national pride is countered by the JFF taking care of its own because of national pride.

        You cannot expect players to play on nose wata and tears.Where is the JFF patriotic pride to take care of its own ?.....we should accept the excuse dat mi bruk....kissteeeth.
        THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

        "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


        "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

        Comment


        • #5
          Mr Becca would make a good travel writer I guess, if he had no sports to write about.

          Having said that I agree that the footballers blackmailed the country. Those issues need to be ironed out before we take the field. Players have to sign agreements before they leave the country; and given what this bunch has done, in future it would be fitting to pay them part of their fee upfront and the rest when they fulfill their part of the agreement. Anyway...

          On the larger scale of funding sports teams at the expense of "poor people", Mr Becca ignores the payback to the country in promotion. It is not the sportsmen and womens fault that the powers that be (public and private) do not piggyback more on what the athletes achieve.
          Peter R

          Comment


          • #6
            PeterR to be honest I think the "promotion" sell is vastly overrated. Maybe like you say its because we don't take advantage of it but whatever the reason, it does not justify the large investments we have made in sports as poor counties in the Caribbean.

            The cricket World Cup to me the best example of this. What has been the payoff for all that money spent by govts in the region? Thats the other problem I have with the PR argument, it is difficult to measure in any scientific way, so it is always used as justification.
            "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

            Comment


            • #7
              With the exception of Usain Bolt all by himself, give me another example of how Jamaican sports have given the country any positive exposure in the past 10 years?
              Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
              Che Guevara.

              Comment


              • #8
                But we are not talking about a luxury like hosting a World Cup...we "have to" send a team to Digicel Cup and that takes money...we "have to" send a team to the Gold Cup and that takes money...if all you have to use is poor people money and you are morally opposed to doing this then scrap the program and the argument done...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Agreed. Whatever redounds to Jamaica through success of its athletes may not necessarily pay back what was invested; however, if we want to compete what choice do we have other than to go cap in hand to the corporate sector and hope to find benefactors.
                  Peter R

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Reasonable argument. Personally I am not particularly opposed to having national teams whose preparation is partially funded by govt, but the idea that we also owe national athletes a full-time living off the taxpayers back is what I disagree with. There are many more pressing priorities.

                    If that means some swimmer or track athlete will defect to compete for another country , so be it and I hold no grudge against them.
                    "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Asafa Powell


                      BLACK LIVES MATTER

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hmmm, not so much, you dont see people coming here from far places to see him run or to buy his clothes etc....
                        Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
                        Che Guevara.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          not so much, but let's not forget the impact he had in "(giving) the country (some) positive exposure in the past 10 years?"


                          BLACK LIVES MATTER

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            He broke the WR three times but then flopped in the big meets- repeatedly.

                            The only people I hear talking about him are the die hards. When he goes anywhere he does not command the attention, crowd and hype as a Bolt for obvious reasons

                            I was in Canada in July and there was this one Ukrainian girl who was a big Asafa fan and I did not even have to say a word as the other international scribes around just alughed at her and one Swedish guy asked her when will be grow a heart and a spine.

                            One journalist from Kenya even went as far as to say she thinks Dexter lee will be better than he is over the long run, ofcourse pointing to three World Titles before age 20.
                            Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
                            Che Guevara.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              we moving off topic now.


                              BLACK LIVES MATTER

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X