RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judge instructs jury to return a not guilty verdict

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judge instructs jury to return a not guilty verdict

    The judge in the Home Circuit Court has directed the jury considering the case of five men who were fatally shot during a joint police-military operation in Tivoli Gardens, west Kingston, in January 2008 to return a not guilty verdict against two Jamaica Defence Force (JDF) soldiers.

    An 11-member jury from the Coroners Inquest had heard depositions into the fatal shooting of Fitzroy Daley, 23, Conrad Francis, 18, Ronaldo Mitchell, 20, and Oneil Palmer, 22, all of Tivoli Gardens; and Kwesi Cunningham, 23, of Eltham Park, St Catherine.

    At the end of a 41-day hearing in the Kingston Coroner's Court, the jury ruled that Mitchell was murdered and police constable Metro Tulloch (now deceased) should be charged with the murder.

    Tulloch was shot and killed in 2009. The jury also returned verdicts that Inspector Linroy Edwards and Constable Neil Gordon should be charged with aiding and abetting murder.

    A verdict was also handed down that two Jamaica Defence Force (JDF) soldiers are to be charged with the murder of Oneil Palmer.

    However, this morning the judge in the Home Circuit court directed that the two soldiers should be found not guilty.

    The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Paula Llewellyn says there was no evidence to convict the soldiers.

    She also says no warrant was sent out for the two members of the constabulary force who were charged with aiding and abetting the murder of Ronaldo Mitchell and that the Coroners Jury had given no explanation for the charges.

    http://go-jamaica.com/news/read_article.php?id=23533
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    dem haffi follow di judge instructions?


    BLACK LIVES MATTER

    Comment


    • #3
      yes...it is a formality.

      Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Gamma View Post
        yes...it is a formality.
        What if they defy the judge's instructions Would they be in contempt of court?
        Life is a system of half-truths and lies, opportunistic, convenient evasion.”
        - Langston Hughes

        Comment

        Working...
        X