Why I support PNP's abstention for an extension of the SoE

[Muadib]

yes, yes...

Why 15 days.. ?

Clarendon requires 30 by law.. Strategic command wants more based on their calculations..

15 days is a red herring..Opposition trying to 'flex' dem muscle when dem realize dem votes required...

Odd choice of issue to 'negotiate' but dem ah set of reprobate from long time.. dats why di country stay suh after their 4 Term 'rule'.

[Muadib]

lol !!!

[MissLondon]

What a load of nonsense.

[1of1]

police wanted 90 days gov. give dem 30, and then grant extension

so everybody a guh argue over fifteen days now

[Mosiah]

all of a sudden wi must give police what dem want, no questions asked. and if dem don't get di full 30, then it's none at all. then how important was the SOE afterall!?!?

[1of1]

no , but at the same time nuh argument nuh inna it, the government could have taken 15 days offered with ease then meet again as suggested then move on from their whether 15, 30, 90 or indefinitely, on the other side of the coin the opposition should have just voted against the soe on principle or agree with the 30 day extension cause at the the end of the day 15 or 30 days it nuh matter

in my opinion as some big man weh mek up parliament dem lame an a ramp wid people life so dem can save face, all weekend come argument ago still deh pon the topic wid nutten fi show for it

[Mosiah]

yes, the opposition could have just rubber-stamped the 30 days, with scant regard to any complaints of abuse. 15 days of abuse is half of 30 days of abuse. i would rather go with 15 days of abusing my people. after more info, let's see if we go with 15 more days. for me, that was the more responsible position to take.

[Mosiah]

that's what I thought too! why couldn't the govt. just grant the 15 days!?!?

[Muadib]

actually not.. 15 days could not have been taken for the State of Emergency in Clarendon.. the constitution allows minimum of 30 days.

Opposition nuh have a limb fi stan pon.. dem decide to play politics and bring in dem ego wid di wrang ting..

[Muadib]

Dem nuh haffi rubah stamp...

Police seh dem want State of Emergency for Clarendon... Opposition seh no.

Simple.

"We cannot afford for this Govt to succeed"

Which part of dat yuh nuh hunnastan ?

[Muadib]

Constitution does not allow for that.

[Don1]

actually not.. 15 days could not have been taken for the State of Emergency in Clarendon.. the constitution allows minimum of 30 days.

Opposition nuh have a limb fi stan pon.. dem decide to play politics and bring in dem ego wid di wrang ting..

Nonsense ..if govament want dem cudda declare emergency inna Clarendon ar anywhey else an vote fi dat...

politricks pon display fram JLPNP...strait

unnu cyan gwaan jump ova dis

[Assasin]

The problem with the PNP position is that they neither support or not support any crime measure and they fail to present ANY PLANS. If they had some suggestions on the table then it would be worth considering.

[Mosiah]

nor does it allow for dual citizenship in parliament.

[Mosiah]

NONSENSE! That notion was shot down!