Tweet
Mannat was engaged by or in order to protect Dudus interests ??
-
-
If I was gullable enough to believe that Bruce's surreptitious attempt to safeguard TG's fine reputation is true then after that so-called fact it backfired(he apologized),who in the end would've benefited from thwarting the extradition request?It has to be Dudus.
Lost to u is the problem all along is Dudus would've benefited.
Blessed -
Why do people assume Mannat was engaged to deal with the extradition request for Dudus ?Comment
-
Get to the point. Unleash the latest spin story.
Will it be a Googly? Or the Doosra? Or maybe even the Teesra?
Stay tuned ladies and gentlemen."It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick DouglassComment
-
well.. let us examine.
What exactly was Mannat supposed to do ?
Get the USA to reverse the request ??Comment
-
Well it came soon thereafter the request, Bruce's so-called admission he contracted the US law firm because of his concern that extradition request(the one for Dudus)would negatively affect the JLP image....
Why would a seasoned criminal law firm be contracted if not to thwart the extradition request? What was the objective?
It is retrofitting .Comment
-
Originally posted by Maudib View PostMannat was engaged by or in order to protect Dudus interests ??
Protecting Dudus means protecting everybody who he can expose. I guess you want to focus on protecting 'everbody' with Dudus as a minow?
who paid the bill?The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.Comment
-
Thwart the reqeuest ??
LOL !
How exactly ?Comment
-
The ill-advised decision to contract Mannat wasn't my doing,your PM has only himself to blame. Fact is fighting the request on both fronts is a thorough approach.Mannat more likely than you, me or Jakan law firms has a better chance of being effective in the USA, they are seasoned and have a relationship with all the players.An expensive PR campaign is what you would have me believe, for that Job why not contract the appropriate (PR)firm?
What was the objective?
BlessedComment
-
ahh... now we starting to think... sheep behaviour put aside...
If we assume Dudus extradition is a done deal (it cannot be overturned).. what else is there to manage ?Comment
-
Dudus could not be protected... his extradition could not be reversed..
Put on yuh thinking cap.Comment
-
Spin it Ben. Spin it. Your services are going to be needed even more in the comeing weeks and months. Like I told you before now would be a good time to renegotiate that contract. Always bargain from a position of strength. Wha you think? will certain ministers in the gov't use Manat or Tom Tavares-Simpson?Comment
-
Who nuh have dem Get out of Jail card by now.. dawg nyam dem suppah
Comment
-
He's is trying to say it was the grand plan of the "chessmaster" to fool Dudus into thinking they are trying to get him off whilst really trying to get him screwed. I think the state dept. says different.
The movie is long stay tuned.not over yetComment
-
huh ??
Suh Dudus really think him would escape extradition ?
Who was Bruce buying time for ?
What negotiations were going on ?
Who would facilitate those negotiations ?
Comment
Comment