RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The secret behind the political secret

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The secret behind the political secret

    The secret behind the political secret
    WIGNALL’S WORLD
    MARK WIGNALL

    Sunday, May 23, 2010

    IN late 2006 when the Trafigura revelations had caught the PNP's bare feet on the burning hot pavement, and the party's general secretary and government Minister of Information Colin Campbell was offered up as a sacrificial lamb via his resignation, a senior member of the PNP told a radio journalist by telephone that "more heads should roll".

    Before the journalist could return from the commercial break he quickly called back and asked that the journalist consider what he had said as confidential. He asked that it be withdrawn. By journalistic codes, there was no choice but to comply but, in doing so, a bigger story suffered a stillbirth.

    PHILLIPS… said he had only known Willie Haggart as a “corner youth”
    SEAGA… attended the funeral of Jim Brown
    SIMPSON MILLER… has found cause to go angelic
    var caption4515127 =


    PHILLIPS… said he had only known Willie Haggart as a “corner youth”


    1/3

    Regularly politicians, in opposition and those holding power, will hold face-to-face conversations with columnists like myself and totally frustrate us by giving us crucial, confidential information that we cannot report on. What it does, however, is provide us with a broader context in which to frame our articles.

    In the 17 years that I have been writing newspaper columns it has been driven home most forcefully to me that what comes out as news to the public is only about 20 per cent of what actually happened because party politics, which has as its main objective the advancement of the people's welfare, operates like a secret, fraternal order even though it advertises 'transparency' as its calling card.

    It has always been an understanding of so-called simple folk in Jamaica that politicians from both sides of the political fence tend to bond across hotel poolside tables and in uptown bars even as they flay each other in heated 'debate' in Gordon House. But sometimes the bonding may be even closer.

    As Prime Minister Bruce Golding grapples with the biggest battle of his political life over the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips affair and the 'Dudus' extradition and arrest order, the PNP has been doing what all opposition parties do — wade headlong into the issue and hurl barbs, especially while the issue of garrison politics is fully on the front burner.

    While the PNP rails against the prime minister, and Opposition Leader Portia Simpson Miller has found cause to go angelic, I was really amazed when I heard Dr Peter Phillips (to me, a better choice for PNP president) telling Emily Crooks that when he attended the funeral of PNP enforcer Willie Haggart he had only known him as a "corner youth".

    When just about everyone within 50 miles of the Black Roses Crew corner knew the shady connections of Willie Haggart, like Dr Omar Davies, Peter Phillips — a highly educated and intelligent man and himself the holder of a garrison constituency — seemed to have found it convenient to play 'hear no evil, see no evil'. More candour is expected from him as he places himself in the forefront of criticising the government over the Dudus extradition matter.

    Dons on the radar since the late 1990s

    After the Special Intelligence Unit was disbanded in 1999, many of the details of what went on there were surreptitiously 'slipped under my door'.
    Set up under Police Commissioner Francis Forbes, it was headed by super spy Roderick 'Jimmy' McGregor and it was disbanded after it was revealed that Jimmy had tapped the phones of people, including senior policemen, politicians and community dons.

    From the documents I saw, among some of the names whose phone conversations were intercepted were Zeeks (PNP), Willie Haggart (PNP) and Dudus (JLP) and certain well-known politicians. I was not able to see a transcript of the conversations so I cannot say that any illegal activities were detected as a result.

    I have written extensively on the links between JLP and PNP street forces which I first detected in September 1998 when gunmen from Tivoli, Rema and Hannah Town forgot their party tribal differences and openly walked along the streets of the western side of downtown Kingston with high-powered rifles and kept the security forces fleeing after Zeeks, the PNP enforcer for Matthews Lane, was detained by the police.

    It was obvious to me at that time that the PNP and JLP street forces had had enough of the stale and tired political leadership which in previous years merely abused poor people's trust, sucked the vote out of them every five years then left them to their own devices.

    As those street forces increased their trade in illicit drugs, more arms were brought in and the extortion racket, otherwise known as 'tax', was partitioned off along PNP and JLP lines. Much more importantly, the dons became the effective government as most of these taxes were used to fund the poor and send their children to school, feed them and assist in dealing with health matters and the funerals of old people.

    The loyalty now being shown to Dudus extends to the western end of the island and it would be foolish for the security forces to underestimate the resolve of these well-armed factions.

    While we must never condone criminality and the rule of the gun, there is a large constituency of people who have grown up under the 'government' of these dons because of the retreat of political leadership, political expediency and that destructive link between the politics and the gun.
    It is quite OK for us who are educated, have reasonable incomes and can plan ahead, to lambast the people who will come out in support of Dudus, but if we are not in their skins and have not lived their despairing lives when politicians fed them only lip service, we will never have a complete understanding of the reality facing them.

    In the interim, based on my gut feeling, I hope we survive this weekend.

    How so quiet, Mr Seaga?

    In 1984, after Shower Posse (muscle) leader Lester Lloyd 'Jim Brown' Coke left Tivoli Gardens with many goons and guns and, in the aftermath, eight men in nearby Rema were shot dead, then Prime Minister Eddie Seaga and other senior JLP ministers drank beer with him in Rema after the predictable not-guilty verdict. To Seaga, it was his way of brokering the peace between the JLP factions in Rema and Tivoli.

    In 1991, Seaga attended the funeral of Jim Brown after a mysterious fire consumed him while he was in a jail cell awaiting extradition. And yet, three years later, that same Seaga had the temerity to draft a list of 13 'troublemakers' from Tivoli, a list which included Brown's son, 25-year-old Christopher 'Dudus' Coke.

    My question to Seaga is, what made Jim Brown palatable to you in the years leading up to 1991 but yet, you could not find common cause with Dudus? Many know the answers, but of course you are as quiet as a church mouse.

    Did known JLP funders assist Peter Phillips?

    In the 2006 PNP presidential race it was widely reported that the campaign for Dr Omar Davies had amassed about $300 million. With him securing just about 300 delegate votes, at $1 million per vote, that had to have been the most expensive election anywhere in the world.

    In the 2008 presidential race between Portia Simpson Miller and Dr Peter Phillips, funding was always going to be a problem because very few were prepared to spend money on a party which had just lost a general election.
    It was no secret that the JLP would always prefer to see Peter Phillips as PNP president than Portia Simpson Miller whom they quite rightly saw as a more formidable candidate because of her ready appeal to the so-called 'masses'.

    In this connection a JLP source 'pushed something under my door', hardly earth-shattering, that in the 2008 PNP internal elections Dr Peter Phillips had approached a certain JLP person with a view to seeking funding for him through JLP sources which were thought to be cash rich. According to the document 'pushed under my door', significant funding was obtained for Dr Phillips.

    When I spoke to Dr Phillips on Thursday he told me a slightly different story. While he did not call a name, he said, "It was they (the JLP) who approached me, in a very informal setting and offered to assist me. They gave me a set of names and on the list were some people whom I had already approached. Plus, many promised but nothing materialised. Is there something wrong with that?"

    I agree with Dr Phillips that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, but I couldn't help but wonder if some of those contributors were among those who contributed to the JLP in the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips matter.

    A first step in 'dismantling' garrisons

    My friend, Denzil 'Wizzy' McDonald, an ardent supporter of the PNP, had a telephone conversation with me last week. I expressed the view that the JLP Cabinet should convince the prime minister to eventually divest himself of the West Kingston constituency where he has been made persona non grata and seek a seat in one of the new ones being formed. Wizzy dismissed my argument and put forward a different solution.

    Many people who are fed up of garrison politics and the rule of the gun simplistically believe that the garrisons can be dismantled by political decree, that is, sing some hymns, read a few Bible verses and tell the people to love PNP and JLP. It is much bigger than that because there are people living in those enclaves who will vote either PNP or JLP even if they travel to Jupiter.

    According to Wizzy, the Electoral Commission should make a close examination of these constituencies and carefully carve and create new physical boundaries where each new constituency will have about a 50:50 split of JLP and PNP voters. "What that would do is force the representative to make an equal appeal to ALL voters across the political divide. They would have to work their butts off to secure the vote and only results would matter in that case."

    It would not be easy, of course, but it would be a meaningful start.

    You missed the point, Mr Cecil Thoms

    In a response to two columns which I wrote on the activities of DYC Fishing, Mr Cecil Thoms, director, communications and public relations in the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, took the opportunity to outline a nice little PR piece for the ministry.

    He began with, "In an article yesterday, following on another written by him two Sunday's ago, surrounding the detention of the fishing vessel, the MV Abbey, and the seizure of its cargo [in this case lobsters] by the Jamaica Customs Department, Mr Wignall argues that 'if the Jamaican authorities are serious about regulating those who're given licences to fish in our waters, much more due diligence must be applied especially in the face of dwindling fish supplies.'

    And then he went on to outline the successes of the ministry.
    Mr Thoms, all I was pointing out was that DYC shipping has two fishing licences and it has two proven breaches in the US courts, one of which included the catching and shipping of undersized lobsters to the US.
    It was more than implied that I was exhorting the ministry to pay special attention to the two fishing licences in the possession of DYC.

    But if I brought out an opportunity for PR on behalf of the ministry, then at least there was something positive in the whole matter. Plus I need to point out that I am a great admirer of the work of Agriculture and Fisheries Minister Chris Tufton and had no pressing need to criticise the ministry.
    Hope you understand that, Mr Thoms.

    observemark@gmail.com
    Last edited by Karl; May 23, 2010, 09:10 AM.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    The politics of the apology
    CLAUDE ROBINSON

    Sunday, May 23, 2010

    PRIME Minister Bruce Golding's apology in his national broadcast last Monday night (May 17) for his role in the Manatt-'Dudus' Coke affair has not achieved his goal of bringing closure to the issue. Indeed, things seem to be heading in the opposite direction.

    On the plus side, many institutional leaders have accepted Mr Golding's expressions of remorse and his tone as sincere admission of wrong; the Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica said they were willing to resume the social partnership they scuttled when the prime minister revealed that he had sanctioned the deal with Manatt.

    GOLDING… has a mountain to climb to regain the trust he acknowledges he has lost
    ROBINSON… resigned as government senator and junior minister of foreign affairs and foreign trade
    CHANG… conceded that the PM would have to resign if it was established that it was the Government that engaged Manatt and not the JLP



    GOLDING… has a mountain to climb to regain the trust he acknowledges he has lost


    1/3

    Equally, there's no quarrel with his conclusion that, "The nation's business cannot continue to be disrupted and distracted by the ordeal of the last several months. We must put it behind us and move on and I hope that after tonight we will be able to do so."

    However, for many of us the apology did not settle the fundamental questions raised by his conduct in the affair for nine months, conduct which led Mr Golding to seriously consider acceding to widespread calls to step down.

    As one of the most memorable weeks in Jamaica's modern political history drew to a close few persons seemed ready to bet on how the drama will end and which political careers will be left intact or in tatters.

    Let's start with the facts on the ground: Residents in the prime minister's West Kingston constituency are dead set against his decision to order the start of extradition proceedings against Christopher 'Dudus' Coke; lawyers were in Court seeking to overturn the order to proceed; and there were no overt moves by the police to execute the warrant for Coke's arrest.

    Police and other reports spoke of armed men patrolling the Tivoli Gardens community in the constituency; the police have alerted the nation to the presence of some very dangerous weapons in the community; television has shown images of make-shift barricades -- some with what police say were explosive or incendiary devices -- blocking all entrances to the community; and, for most of Thursday, hundreds of protestors marched through the downtown business district vowing to keep Coke away from the reach of both Jamaica and US law enforcement.

    The police and military ramped up their readiness to respond to the situation but, up to late Thursday made no moves to confront the criminal elements and establish State control over the community.

    Correctly, the security forces appeared to want to avoid the kind of bloody confrontation that occurred most recently in 2001 when 27 persons died. A critical issue facing the country was how long the stand-off could remain without a response from the State.

    On the political front, the Manatt-Dudus imbroglio claimed its first scalp Thursday as the previously rumoured resignation of Dr Ronald Robinson as government senator and junior minister of foreign affairs and foreign trade took effect.

    The resignation came in the wake of revelations that, as a minister, Robinson had 'contact' with representatives of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips (MPP) who were retained to lobby the US administration to make the extradition request go away.

    It has been suggested that the junior minister quit because he was being made a scapegoat, being fingered as the only member of the administration who had the kind of 'contact' with MPP that could have led the firm to believe their client was the Government of Jamaica and not the JLP as Mr Golding consistently and loudly proclaims.

    Now that there is a crack in the wall of political solidarity there are questions as to whether there will be other casualties. Were other persons, of Cabinet rank, engaged in the scheme to cover the true purpose of the lobbying effort?

    As these events developed the prime minister was inexplicably absent and silent. Nevertheless, he was in the centre of the storm and must be aware that there are still calls for him to tell the whole truth about the engagement of Manatt and to hold himself accountable for his role in creating the crisis which now grips the country.

    Among other things, we cannot 'move on' until there is full disclosure on how Manatt came to be engaged and what was the source of funds and what was the true purpose of the engagement.

    Why did Mr Golding and other unnamed persons in the JLP believe they should engage a lobbying firm to intervene in what was supposed to be a treaty dispute between Jamaica and the United States? When did the prime minister know that his instructions for a party initiative had been transformed into a government initiative?

    Manatt reaffirmed last week that they represented the Jamaican Government from the very beginning. "In our contract signed by [attorney] Mr [Harold] Brady, he acknowledges that he was authorised to contract with Manatt on behalf of the Jamaican Government," their legal counsel said. "We facilitated meetings between representatives of the US and Jamaican governments in their official capacities; and we had formal communications with Jamaican Government representatives related to our representation."

    The clarification is important because it goes to the heart of the question: Why did the prime minister commit so much state and party resources to push back the request for Mr Coke to face charges of drug-trafficking and gun-running? Was the lobbying really about freeing Mr Coke and references to "treaty matters" were just a smokescreen?

    The answer will also give important clues as to how much weight should be attached to Mr Golding's latest re-statement of an old theme that he will personally lead the drive to dismantle garrison politics and break the stranglehold of organised crime on the political process.

    It is significant that JLP deputy leader Dr Horace Chang, speaking on CVM TV's Direct programme Wednesday night, conceded that the prime minister would have to resign if it was established that it was the Government that engaged Manatt and not the JLP as they insist.

    In his statement to Parliament on May 11, the prime minister said he would consider releasing the exchange of e-mails between Brady, Manatt and Solicitor General Douglas Leys. He must do so without any further delay.

    Finally, there is the prime minister's complete about-face on acceding to the extradition request which he had stoutly defended on the "concepts of fairness and justice" and constitutional principles.

    So why did he flip? The prime minister said he weighed those principles "against the public mistrust that this matter has evoked and the destabilising effect it is having on the nation's business".

    The principles were supposed to be so firmly held that, at one stage, Mr Golding said he was prepared to pay the ultimate political price. Has he now abandoned them for political expedience or were they not as deeply held as the prime minister claimed?

    Either way, the prime minister knows that he has a mountain to climb to regain the trust he acknowledges he has lost. I wish him well. He has to start by showing extraordinary leadership in his own constituency because if he cannot lead the process to affirm the legitimacy of the State in the community, then the rest of the lofty agenda repeated Monday is just words.

    kcr@cwjamaica.com
    Last edited by Karl; May 23, 2010, 09:19 AM.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment


    • #3
      More questions than answers

      JAMES MOSS-SOLOMON


      Sunday, May 23, 2010





      THE song by Tracy Chapman says "sorry, is all that I can say" and can be readily applied to the statement made by the prime minister to the nation on Monday, May 17, 2010. In what appears to have been a heartfelt apology, it is obvious that there are many areas which will require further clarification. In looking at his address, I am going to try to deal with these in an order which follows his speech.

      1. A Period of Reflection - The prime minister alludes to having spent the last "several days in deep contemplation about the issues", but the issues themselves are not quite as complicated if everyone was willing to face the truth. At the time of writing, a warrant has been issued for the arrest of Mr Christopher 'Dudus' Coke, and as may be expected, he has certain rights under the law which his lawyers have no doubt taken into consideration. One of his attorneys, Mr Tom Tavares-Finson, has indicated that his client has instructed him to fight the extradition in court. Therefore, the constitutional rights of Mr Coke will be protected. So I question, what took so many months to allow a Jamaican citizen to exercise his rights in court? Also, following the withdrawal of Mr Tavares-Finson from the defence team is this a conflict of interest situation, and if yes, should that decision have been taken long ago?


      Residents of West Kingston stage a protest march downtown last Thursday in support of Christopher 'Dudus' Coke. (Photo: Lionel Rookwood)
      GOLDING... if he was the CEO of a company whose product had somehow lost its market appeal, then either he would have to find new products or go bankrupt
      Residents of West Kingston stage a protest march downtown last Thursday in support of Christopher 'Dudus' Coke. (Photo: Lionel Rookwood) 1/2

      2. The prime minister alluded to the views of the public, the Cabinet and parliamentary members, and the party organisation. The statement made by Minister Vaz concerning the precedence of loyalty to party before country should not have been allowed to enter the picture at all, and a legal matter which is to be pursued by a sovereign government should not be subject to the whims and fancies of a political party not recognised in the constitution. Therefore, I ask the question, who in that grouping has anything to hide? If the prime minister knows and does nothing about it, then his apology would have been in vain.

      3. In characteristic style, the prime minister has asked for divine guidance, and while I applaud his efforts in seeking this, mankind has been given free will by God, and must use their own conscience to guide them during ethical or moral dilemmas. Certainly, someone of the prime minister's stature must realise that this lapse would have been hurtful to his family, close friends and well-wishers. The question therefore is, did he take into account all of this over the past several months.

      4. The prime minister agrees that the party should never have been involved at this level, and therefore, he should clearly state what action he will take in order to ensure that those members who may have misled him are not placed in a position to do it again. The prime minister however, did formally recognise that based on his previous utterance, a great many people who put their trust in him have been gravely disappointed.

      5. In repairing trust, the prime minister must be aware that he has to take the straightforward and blunt approach, that is, to remove those around him who seem bent on encouraging him to break that trust. That goes for parliamentarians, Cabinet members, and party officials. It extends also to the large number of sycophants who surround successive political leaders whose only interest is personal gain (as schoolboys we used to refer to them as slurpers). As the leader of this country, he needs to rid himself of that useless baggage, and perhaps replace them and their incompetence with people who wish to serve their country in a manner untainted by scandal and gossip, or blind party allegiance.

      6. In the issue of Mannatt Phelps & Phillips, there must be a person or persons who need to be disciplined. If the only person involved was Mr Harold Brady, then disciplinary action, certainly from within the party, needs to be evident. If however, he was instructed by others still within the party and/or Parliament, then the prime minister needs to take stringent action. The question is, who are these persons and what are their deep, dark secrets? Also, who paid the fee by a cheque? We need to know before the United States disclose it, as you can be certain that they have the relevant information as to the source. Those persons who, as the prime minister indicated, over-stepped their bounds by involving the Government, need to be removed from any public offices where trust is a requirement.

      The prime minister spoke about not being business as usual and I commend him for saying that. The statement itself requires that different ways be found to address whatever these changing conditions may be. If the prime minister was the CEO of a company whose product had somehow lost its market appeal, then either he would have to find new products or go bankrupt. Similarly, if an employee commits theft or other actions which may lead the company into disrepute, it is the duty of the CEO to fire the offending party. If the person who creates the problem is the CEO, then it is the responsibility of the board to dismiss him/her.

      As I write this, Tivoli Gardens is reportedly locked down from the inside. The citizens have decided to defend Mr Coke for undeclared reasons thus far. It seems that it could be from a love which does not fear death, or a response to an order which may promise death for non-compliance. It could also be a fear that the situation may encourage the incursion of political opposites, or rival gangs, who may feel emboldened by the situation. Whatever the reason, Tivoli Gardens seems to be well stocked with the implements of mass blockading. Regrettably, decent persons are going to face some of the deprivation associated with isolation. Perhaps they are the ones for whom we should pray, beseeching God's help in their safe deliverance.

      The prime minister has promised political and constitutional reform in an effort to transform the politics of this country. These are all laudable pronouncements but they are not new and no government has yet been bold enough to take the steps required to limit its own "divine authority", although the call for this started in 1964 with Honourable Dudley Thompson and continued through prime ministers Hugh Shearer, Michael Manley, Edward Seaga, PJ Patterson, Portia Simpson-Miller and now Bruce Golding. So I ask the question, will the current prime minister have the commitment as expressed in his Monday night mea culpa?

      I was asked by a government official recently at a corporate governance review to make a suggestion. My quick and sincere response was "try hiring honest people first". The "whistle blower" legislation cannot work in a country where the culture gravitates to an "informer fi dead" mentality. Honest handling of government funds cannot exist in an economy where over 50 per cent of the country is in the grey undocumented area.

      Finally, the prime minister hopes that the distraction of the last several months will go away so that we can focus on some of the other problems which face Jamaica. Some of these problems should really lie outside of the sole responsibility of government and as such, the business development responsibility needs to be thrust firmly in the arena of the private sector.

      The role of the Government only needs to be that of a referee so as to make sure that the game is played by the accepted and legal rules. As the official on the field of play, the Government's role should be that of ensuring fair play, not doling out favours to "persons of interest". The continued reference by commentators, journalists, analysts, and the public at large concerning "legitimate companies", fails to take into account the initial methods of funding those organisations and the fact that we have such a thing as a Proceeds of Crime Act.

      So the registration of a company funded by illicit activities does not make it legal, and such companies are liable under the law to the seizure of their assets. In the common parlance to which we are accustomed, a company is not the proper recipient of funds collected through proceeds of drugs, arms, or money laundering. So the question is where are these companies, and should they be investigated?

      As you can see, there are still several questions which need to be investigated and answered truthfully by the prime minister. Yes sir, the apology has been heard, but for many, the hurt and disappointment still remain, and only by the forthright and truthful addressing of your responsibility will that forgiveness become applicable.

      "There are more questions than answers and the more I find out, the less I know," (written and sung by Johnny Nash).

      Prime minister, work is burning in the fields (Fervet Opus in Campis).
      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

      Comment


      • #4
        When it’s about Jamaica — It's personal

        BY LIZ-MARIE ACHEME

        Sunday, May 23, 2010





        I confess that I haven't been myself lately.

        I have been so consumed by this Manatt, Phelps & Phillips/ Christopher 'Dudus' Coke affair that I have been unable to function properly at home and at work. I have been anxious, angry and hungry for truth and hope, with every twist and turn in this whole saga.


        GOLDING… more to be gained if he stays in office
        GOLDING… more to be gained if he stays in office 1/1

        And though my body has been in the United Kingdom where I work, my heart, mind and my attention have been wrestling with what's happening in Jamaica -- my home.

        You won't be surprised then to hear that when I woke up on Tuesday, May 18, 2010, the first thing I did was to boot up the computer to seek out Bruce Golding's speech to the nation. This, after his handling of the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips/Christopher 'Dudus' Coke extradition affair led to calls for his resignation.

        He had spoken to the people of Jamaica at 8:30 pm the previous day -- that's 2:30 in the morning UK time. I had planned to wait up for his speech but I didn't make it.

        On the morning of May 18, I searched for the speech like my life depended on it. When I found it, I heard a prime minister saying, "I'm sorry" and addressing the Jamaican people with what I think was humility and sincerity.

        If he wasn't making headway with others, it was clear that the prime minister was off to a good start with me. Here I was at 7:00 am UK time and instead of getting ready for work, I was sitting up in bed with the laptop on my lap and saying "Yes," "No," "Exactly," to the computer screen as I listened and responded to Bruce Golding's speech. He was connecting with me. He had to. This, after all, is not a party political matter for me. It's national and it's personal.

        I, like so many other Jamaicans, have been hurt, disappointed and disrespected by the prime minister's handling of the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips/ Christopher 'Dudus' Coke extradition affair and with the JLP's insistence that the prime minister had done nothing wrong.

        A Good Speech


        I can't say the prime minister's speech removed all the sting from the pain I have felt so sharply over the last few days, for I am still wounded, but it did soothe me to some extent when I realised that the tone of his speech was hitting many of the right notes.

        The speech was well-written and presented. The message was clear and acceptable in my view and it was pitched appropriately to the different levels of the Jamaican society. Bruce Golding was succeeding in communicating to the people of Jamaica. If he didn't reach all of us, he certainly got my attention.

        I used to be sure that the prime minister would hit the right chords with the country, once he did a message to the nation. He has that kind of communication skill. But I had wondered if arrogance now permanently lives where that Bruce Golding who was voted in as prime minister previously lived. I was not sure which one of them would be taking the microphone at such a crucial time in the life of our nation. Luckily, a humbled prime minister -- the servant of the people -- Bruce Golding, delivered the apology to the nation.

        There are still questions


        Having given to Bruce Golding what is due to him -- we cannot pretend that he gave us all that is due to us in answering the questions that his actions have led us to ask -- I believe that there is still room for suspicion.

        Some of the questions that are still unanswered include:

        * Did the prime minister of Jamaica set out to deceive the people of Jamaica in the first place? Is this a case of poor handling of a sensitive situation, or a mixture of both intended deception and blunder?

        * Why did the JLP feel the need to find and fund a lobbyist (Manatt, Phelps & Phillips) for 'Dudus'? Does 'Dudus' have secrets for them? Who exactly is paying for it? What were they hoping to achieve?

        * If the prime minister in his role as party leader sanctioned the lobbying... Why? Did he weigh Jamaica's need for justice after suffering at the hands of criminals and the international perception of Jamaica as the land of gangsters against the justice he sought for 'Dudus'? And ultimately, whose side is he really on?

        * If in fact the US has contravened the extradition treaty with Jamaica -- what place does a JLP lobby effort have in this whole affair. Isn't it a government to government matter?

        * Did the Prime Minister undermine the role of the Solicitor General in all of this by pursuing lobbying efforts sanctioned by Bruce (with his JLP Leader hat on, of course, not his prime minister's hat) or was the solicitor general in collusion with the JLP?

        * How does the prime minister account for taking an action as JLP leader that conflicts with/and is not in the best interest of the Jamaican people? This, after all, is the same person who told the PNP in the Trafigura scandal that you cannot jump out of one skin (The government skin) into another (the party skin) because there are consequences.

        * Why didn't Mr Golding tell us that he was aware of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips' involvement in the extradition affair from the outset? Why tell us now?

        * How does the prime minister account for his spokesman saying that the prime minister was in deep contemplation over the whole issue and would put the interest of the party first?

        * Does the prime minister put the party or the people of Jamaica first?

        * We understand that Prime Minister Bruce Golding cannot go public with every detail of an extradition request. It is a sensitive matter. But is the prime minister withholding information in the interest of 'Dudus', the JLP or the people of Jamaica? What are his motives?

        * How does the prime minister account for the inability of his party to understand and admit to the fact that declining to tell the nation that he was aware of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips' involvement in the extradition affair amounts to dishonesty? How did they decide "He has done nothing wrong"? How can we trust a party that does not know wrong from right?

        I forgive you, prime minister


        Despite all of my questions, I am willing to forgo further probing of the matter at this juncture and will respond to the prime minister's plea for forgiveness with "Yes, prime minister, I forgive you. I will give you a second chance. I will give you time to repair the broken relationship with your countrymen and women and will support your efforts to rebuild our nation."

        Many of our people will, over time, forgive the prime minister but for now, he will be kept at a distance. Our nation is still hurting and words are not enough to make it alright. It takes time for healing and we are waiting to see if these words will be backed up by action.

        I accept that there are many Jamaicans still who are not able to understand or appreciate my position. Having called for the prime minister's resignation, for them an apology -- no matter how sincere and eloquent -- is not a good enough atonement and I understand why they feel this way.

        As hard as it is to swallow, I invite them to consider the view that if Mr Golding has truly repented (and I have no reason to doubt his sincerity at this time), our country may actually stand to benefit more if he continues in office.

        If he does resign, when I look ahead, I see a worse predicament. I see Jamaica's economical recovery programme destined for disaster. I see a country where there are no viable alternatives to take over the mantle of leadership, neither in the JLP nor the PNP. I hear Jamaicans crying out, "Who shall lead us?" and I see a political system and culture that doom us to a similar variety of bad governance down the road.

        I believe there is more to be gained if Mr Golding stays in office and delivers on those promises he made in his speech. Promises of constitutional reform, dismantling of garrisons and tougher crime measures -- promises that if kept, should make it more difficult for politicians to put party over country, sleep in the same bed with criminals and sell out the Jamaican people and get away with it.

        We have no guarantees that Bruce Golding will be able to rebuild the trust the Jamaican people placed in him when they voted him into power. There are no guarantees that he will deliver on his promises either, but I believe it is the right thing to give him the chance to try.

        Trust is earned and he will have to work hard to regain the trust of the people of Jamaica.

        To earn this trust, he will have to lead a team that learns to listen. The prime minister must keep himself and his team in check, to ensure that they act responsibly and humbly, as servants of the people. He must also learn to manage both truth and perception so that he prevents rather than escalates difficult situations into national crises.

        I concede that even before this crisis, Bruce Golding has had a difficult job. It's hard enough to manage a people and party when there are competing and often conflicting interests. Since coming to power, he's had to tackle one disaster after another -- natural and man- made -- and right now our nation is facing multiple difficulties: economic, political and social. Jamaicans from all sides have come to agree that "Him really salt."

        Add to that, the fact that this is Bruce Golding's first experience of being prime minister. He has to be learning on the job and every mistake has extraordinary national consequences.

        It's a hard job being prime minister of Jamaica and whatever criticisms I level at him, I wouldn't have the guts to be Bruce Golding right now.

        It's not over


        Having listened to the prime minister's speech, I believe it is the first step in the right direction. But it's just one step. This matter is not behind us yet. The PNP are expected to call for a no-confidence vote in Mr Golding, which means our attention and time will continue to be focused on this issue. We also wait to see if the private sector and civil society will resume working relationships with the prime minister.

        The fact that the extradition proceeding will be moving forward, there are fears that law and order may be compromised as those who support Christopher 'Dudus' Coke assert themselves. Already downtown Kingston is tense and there is panic in other parts of Jamaica as well.

        If there are more skeletons in the closet in this whole affair, they may yet come tumbling out and will haunt Bruce Golding, the JLP and Jamaica. This extradition matter has only just begun.

        Jamaicans for Jamaica - show your face


        As for the Jamaican people, we have a history of being a country of nine-day wonders. It has to change. We have to take responsibility for the state of the country and be participants in its cleansing and rebuilding. We have asked for a trustworthy leader but we too must be men, women and children of good character who value honesty, fairness, justice and truth in our own lives and in our activities with each other.

        We have to continue to be vigilant and proactive citizens -- not JLP and PNP, the parties in between and No P.

        We, after all, are in charge of our destiny. We cannot leave it to the Government and we cannot be led by the Opposition, we must scrutinise them both in the interest of Jamaica.

        We've had a taste of people power. It's been so long since we stood up together for something on a matter of principle and not party.

        We have the power and the ability to make a difference without burning tyres in the road and destroying the very country which we seek to build.

        This passion and patriotism, this exercising of free speech and lobbying power that have emerged as a result of the extradition case should be harnessed, built upon and used.

        But we cannot stop there. Those of us who speak our patriotism must back it up with action. Those of us who show our patriotic status on facebook and get the word out on twitter have made a good start. What a difference we could make if we also show our faces and join hands in rebuilding our schools, our communities -- our nation.

        As it's time for confessions, I admit that I am one of those Jamaicans who I am calling to action.

        I have been reflecting on what my country means to me. I have been trying to identify my own gifts and talents and have been asking myself, "How can I help to build a better Jamaica wherever I am?"

        Jamaica is in a mess. We have to clean it up. It's a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it.

        Whose job is it to clean up Jamaica? It can't be "the Government" alone.

        "If not me, who? If not now, when?"

        I have challenged myself to roll up my sleeves and do my part to change my nation and so must all of us as Jamaicans.

        God has blessed our country -- Land of Bob, Bolt, Belafonte, Bennett -- and that's just the Bs (I got that from The Book Thief by Markus Zusac).

        Jamaica is the "one love" island -- affectionately called -- JA, Jamrock, Jamdown (That's not original either. I got that from you.)

        Together we can build our nation.

        lizmarieacheme@yahoo.co.uk
        THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

        "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


        "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

        Comment


        • #5
          Sunday | May 23, 2010


          document.context='fHA6MTQ3MTMy';


          document.context='fHA6MTQ3MTMy';



          Commentary

          Subscribe to this feed
          Follow us on twitter


          document.context='fHA6MTQ3MTMy';

          Playing party 'politricks'

          Published: Sunday | May 23, 2010 0 Comments and 0 Reactions



          Cooper





          Carolyn Cooper, Contributor Bruce Golding's abortive attempt to resign as leader of the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) raises far more questions than it answers. Golding's failure to concede defeat unequivocally and accede to the wishes of civil society confirms our collective fear that, even in the face of a national crisis of unprece-dented proportions, indi-vidual integrity must yield to the demands of partisan politics.
          The decision of the Central Excecutive of the JLP not to accept Golding's resignation reinforces the popular perception that the function of leader of the party takes precedence over the role of [COLOR=orange !important][COLOR=orange !important]prime [COLOR=orange !important]minister[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]. Propping up the fallen leader appears to be a much higher priority than preserving the integrity of the high office of prime minister.
          Ironically, this 'separation of powers' is precisely what got Mr Golding into trouble in the first place. In the matter of that fateful sanctioning of the decision to hire the law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips to lobby on behalf of the JLP, Mr Golding claimed that his sacrosanct role as prime minister could not at all be compromised by his actions as leader of the JLP.
          Tragedy or Farce?
          Let us suppose that Mr Golding is, indeed, right, and the roles and responsibilities of prime minister and leader of the [COLOR=orange !important][COLOR=orange !important]party[/COLOR][/COLOR] are, in fact, separate and unequal. Does this mean that, as leader of the party, he was entitled to lie about sanctioning the decision to engage [COLOR=orange !important][COLOR=orange !important]lobbyists[/COLOR][/COLOR] on behalf of a top-ranking member of his constituency?
          Should there be one standard of integrity for the prime minister and another for the leader of the Jamaica Labour Party? It would appear that the Central Executive of the JLP unanimously says yes. Otherwise, the Central Executive would have accepted Mr Golding's resignation. If, in clear conscience - as I would like to believe - Mr Golding did acknowledge that he had grievously erred and had tarnished the image of both leader of the party and prime minister, he should have been allowed to redeem himself by resigning from both posts.
          In a devilish twist, the Central Executive's concerted refusal to accept Mr Golding's honourable resignation may be an ever bigger punishment than we can fully imagine: a guilt-ridden man, forced to live with a demanding conscience that will give him no peace. This is the drama of which great tragedy is made. Shakespeare or Trevor Rhone could do no better than this.
          Of course, there are sceptics who will cynically conclude that the resignation ploy was nothing but a farce. The gesture of offering to resign allows Mr Golding to appear penitent: 'Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa'. The compassionate refusal of the Central Executive to accept the resignation becomes an act of absolution. The not-quite-guilty leader of the party is forgiven and it's back to business as usual for the not-quite-innocent prime minister.
          Analysis of the language of Mr Golding's apology to the nation does, I think, provide some evidence in support of the cynics who doubt the credibility of the prime minister's contrite posture. The prevailing tone of Mr Golding's speech is one of religious piety. In the language of fundamentalist Christianity, Mr Golding seeks 'forgiveness' and 'atonement' for sin.
          Religion versus Politics
          This is the rhetoric of church, not [COLOR=orange !important][COLOR=orange !important]state [COLOR=orange !important]politics[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]. Mr Golding is appealing to passion, not reason. He does not [COLOR=orange !important][COLOR=orange !important]present[/COLOR][/COLOR] his error of judgement as a matter of poor governance. Taken out of the arena of Parliament and into the sanctuary of the Church, Mr Golding's evasion of the full truth of the hiring of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips becomes a matter of sin, and not a judicial issue that might require legal sanctions. Furthermore, it is a sin of omission - not telling all - rather than commission.
          Mr Golding knows his Bible very well, especially the New Testament, with its advocacy of liberating 'grace' over damning Old Testament 'law'. By appealing to the fundamentalist Christian values of the majority of Jamaicans, Mr Golding appears to be hoping that he will simply be washed in the blood of the Lamb and will rise forth from this baptism as a new creature in Christ Jesus. Born-again Bruce will start over with a brand new slate on which he will be very careful about writing letters.
          But is it really honourable for Mr Golding to try to salvage his political career by claiming to want to save his soul? Even as he asks the Jamaican people to forgive his trespasses, he is still testing our faith. As prime minister, Golding argued that it was a matter of principle not to agree hurriedly to the infamous extradition request. What has changed to make the extradition now acceptable? What "additional information" has the prime minister recently received? It appears as if political expediency supersedes principle.
          The most puzzling statement made by Mr Golding in his speech of 'atonement' is this: "... I am committing myself to do everything that is humanly possible to repair the damage that has been done to that trust." Oddly enough, the prime minister does not appear to think that it is 'humanly possible' for him simply to resign. Apparently, it would take divine intervention.
          Convinced that his resignation is not an appropriate sacrifice to offer on the altar of atonement, Mr Golding seems to want us to resign ourselves to the prospect that he is the very best candidate the Jamaica Labour Party can offer the nation as prime minister. Perhaps, he's right. And, if so, that's the real tragedy.
          Carolyn Cooper is professor of literary and cultural studies at the University of the West Indies, Mona. Send feedback to: karokupa@gmail.com or columns@gleanerjm.com
          THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

          "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


          "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

          Comment


          • #6
            Once Dudus is gone we can go back to living in our little slice of paradise

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by X View Post
              More questions than answers

              JAMES MOSS-SOLOMON


              Sunday, May 23, 2010





              THE song by Tracy Chapman says "sorry, is all that I can say" and can be readily applied to the statement made by the prime minister to the nation on Monday, May 17, 2010. In what appears to have been a heartfelt apology, it is obvious that there are many areas which will require further clarification. In looking at his address, I am going to try to deal with these in an order which follows his speech.

              1. A Period of Reflection - The prime minister alludes to having spent the last "several days in deep contemplation about the issues", but the issues themselves are not quite as complicated if everyone was willing to face the truth. At the time of writing, a warrant has been issued for the arrest of Mr Christopher 'Dudus' Coke, and as may be expected, he has certain rights under the law which his lawyers have no doubt taken into consideration. One of his attorneys, Mr Tom Tavares-Finson, has indicated that his client has instructed him to fight the extradition in court. Therefore, the constitutional rights of Mr Coke will be protected. So I question, what took so many months to allow a Jamaican citizen to exercise his rights in court? Also, following the withdrawal of Mr Tavares-Finson from the defence team is this a conflict of interest situation, and if yes, should that decision have been taken long ago?
              ...and the matter of mr. Christopher "Dudus" Coke not being able to be found by the police comes into question.

              His JLP Senator and JLP party man lawyer could certain receive instructions from him on how to proceed.


              Residents of West Kingston stage a protest march downtown last Thursday in support of Christopher 'Dudus' Coke. (Photo: Lionel Rookwood)
              GOLDING... if he was the CEO of a company whose product had somehow lost its market appeal, then either he would have to find new products or go bankrupt
              Residents of West Kingston stage a protest march downtown last Thursday in support of Christopher 'Dudus' Coke. (Photo: Lionel Rookwood) 1/2

              2. The prime minister alluded to the views of the public, the Cabinet and parliamentary members, and the party organisation. The statement made by Minister Vaz concerning the precedence of loyalty to party before country should not have been allowed to enter the picture at all, and a legal matter which is to be pursued by a sovereign government should not be subject to the whims and fancies of a political party not recognised in the constitution. Therefore, I ask the question, who in that grouping has anything to hide? If the prime minister knows and does nothing about it, then his apology would have been in vain.
              Either PM Golding or JLP leader Golding or both has something to hide. ...and it all has to do with why the PM or JLP leader or both used the resources of the state to protect an indicted alleged gun-runner and drug dealing Don.


              3. In characteristic style, the prime minister has asked for divine guidance, and while I applaud his efforts in seeking this, mankind has been given free will by God, and must use their own conscience to guide them during ethical or moral dilemmas. Certainly, someone of the prime minister's stature must realise that this lapse would have been hurtful to his family, close friends and well-wishers. The question therefore is, did he take into account all of this over the past several months.
              Cho...unimportant!


              4. The prime minister agrees that the party should never have been involved at this level, and therefore, he should clearly state what action he will take in order to ensure that those members who may have misled him are not placed in a position to do it again. The prime minister however, did formally recognise that based on his previous utterance, a great many people who put their trust in him have been gravely disappointed.
              The question is, when will criminal charges be bought against those who the PM claims falsely represented themselves as government reps or agents?


              5. In repairing trust, the prime minister must be aware that he has to take the straightforward and blunt approach, that is, to remove those around him who seem bent on encouraging him to break that trust. That goes for parliamentarians, Cabinet members, and party officials. It extends also to the large number of sycophants who surround successive political leaders whose only interest is personal gain (as schoolboys we used to refer to them as slurpers). As the leader of this country, he needs to rid himself of that useless baggage, and perhaps replace them and their incompetence with people who wish to serve their country in a manner untainted by scandal and gossip, or blind party allegiance.
              Amen! ...at my school we used to call them "******************** lickers". ...the unfortunate thing for PM Golding involved in that group is, either PM Golding or his alter ego Leader of the JLP Golding or both!


              6. In the issue of Mannatt Phelps & Phillips, there must be a person or persons who need to be disciplined. If the only person involved was Mr Harold Brady, then disciplinary action, certainly from within the party, needs to be evident. If however, he was instructed by others still within the party and/or Parliament, then the prime minister needs to take stringent action. The question is, who are these persons and what are their deep, dark secrets? Also, who paid the fee by a cheque? We need to know before the United States disclose it, as you can be certain that they have the relevant information as to the source. Those persons who, as the prime minister indicated, over-stepped their bounds by involving the Government, need to be removed from any public offices where trust is a requirement.
              That disclosure of the 'money trail' shall surely follow as night follows day.

              I am convinced that not only the US Government but also persons within Jamaica outside of those who actually has "stains left on their hands for having handled the money" have the information on the 'money trail'.



              The prime minister spoke about not being business as usual and I commend him for saying that. The statement itself requires that different ways be found to address whatever these changing conditions may be. If the prime minister was the CEO of a company whose product had somehow lost its market appeal, then either he would have to find new products or go bankrupt. Similarly, if an employee commits theft or other actions which may lead the company into disrepute, it is the duty of the CEO to fire the offending party. If the person who creates the problem is the CEO, then it is the responsibility of the board to dismiss him/her.
              ...and that is Golding's dilemma! He needs his positions as PM and leader of the JLP to protect him from possible criminal persecution and remaining as PM or Leader of the JLP guarantees the JLP being thrown out of office. Golding is a poison pill to the GOJ and to his party.

              As I write this, Tivoli Gardens is reportedly locked down from the inside. The citizens have decided to defend Mr Coke for undeclared reasons thus far. It seems that it could be from a love which does not fear death, or a response to an order which may promise death for non-compliance. It could also be a fear that the situation may encourage the incursion of political opposites, or rival gangs, who may feel emboldened by the situation. Whatever the reason, Tivoli Gardens seems to be well stocked with the implements of mass blockading. Regrettably, decent persons are going to face some of the deprivation associated with isolation. Perhaps they are the ones for whom we should pray, beseeching God's help in their safe deliverance.
              If this goes on much longer it would appear the only thing any government must do is remove the gun-toting criminal elements who have taken over a part of the state and set up 'sovereign borders'.


              The prime minister has promised political and constitutional reform in an effort to transform the politics of this country. These are all laudable pronouncements but they are not new and no government has yet been bold enough to take the steps required to limit its own "divine authority", although the call for this started in 1964 with Honourable Dudley Thompson and continued through prime ministers Hugh Shearer, Michael Manley, Edward Seaga, PJ Patterson, Portia Simpson-Miller and now Bruce Golding. So I ask the question, will the current prime minister have the commitment as expressed in his Monday night mea culpa?
              Yes?

              [quote]


              I was asked by a government official recently at a corporate governance review to make a suggestion. My quick and sincere response was "try hiring honest people first". The "whistle blower" legislation cannot work in a country where the culture gravitates to an "informer fi dead" mentality. Honest handling of government funds cannot exist in an economy where over 50 per cent of the country is in the grey undocumented area.

              Finally, the prime minister hopes that the distraction of the last several months will go away so that we can focus on some of the other problems which face Jamaica. Some of these problems should really lie outside of the sole responsibility of government and as such, the business development responsibility needs to be thrust firmly in the arena of the private sector.

              The role of the Government only needs to be that of a referee so as to make sure that the game is played by the accepted and legal rules. As the official on the field of play, the Government's role should be that of ensuring fair play, not doling out favours to "persons of interest". The continued reference by commentators, journalists, analysts, and the public at large concerning "legitimate companies", fails to take into account the initial methods of funding those organisations and the fact that we have such a thing as a Proceeds of Crime Act.

              So the registration of a company funded by illicit activities does not make it legal, and such companies are liable under the law to the seizure of their assets. In the common parlance to which we are accustomed, a company is not the proper recipient of funds collected through proceeds of drugs, arms, or money laundering. So the question is where are these companies, and should they be investigated?

              As you can see, there are still several questions which need to be investigated and answered truthfully by the prime minister. Yes sir, the apology has been heard, but for many, the hurt and disappointment still remain, and only by the forthright and truthful addressing of your responsibility will that forgiveness become applicable.

              "There are more questions than answers and the more I find out, the less I know," (written and sung by Johnny Nash).

              Prime minister, work is burning in the fields (Fervet Opus in Campis).
              Surely going down the right road.
              Good article!
              Good talk, boss!
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by X View Post
                The secret behind the political secret
                WIGNALL’S WORLD
                MARK WIGNALL

                Sunday, May 23, 2010

                IN late 2006 when the Trafigura revelations had caught the PNP's bare feet on the burning hot pavement, and the party's general secretary and government Minister of Information Colin Campbell was offered up as a sacrificial lamb via his resignation, a senior member of the PNP told a radio journalist by telephone that "more heads should roll"......
                That was apparent. Everyone who was involved in the affair and who knew about it but did nothing should have resigned from government and party.


                I was really amazed when I heard Dr Peter Phillips (to me, a better choice for PNP president) telling Emily Crooks that when he attended the funeral of PNP enforcer Willie Haggart he had only known him as a "corner youth".

                When just about everyone within 50 miles of the Black Roses Crew corner knew the shady connections of Willie Haggart, like Dr Omar Davies, Peter Phillips — a highly educated and intelligent man and himself the holder of a garrison constituency — seemed to have found it convenient to play 'hear no evil, see no evil'. More candour is expected from him as he places himself in the forefront of criticising the government over the Dudus extradition matter.
                Sound like Mark still don't get it. Why would Phillips openly say he knew Haggart as a murderer and a gunman to any one (whether a reporter or not) in the presence of at least one journalist/reporter and not invoke some confidentiality agreement with everyone within earshot? In any case what was left unsaid probably spoke more than what was said. If Phillips said he knew Haggart as a "corner youth" what he left unsaid was "a corner youth who has killed and would kill people."


                Originally posted by Mark Wignall
                It was obvious to me at that time that the PNP and JLP street forces had had enough of the stale and tired political leadership which in previous years merely abused poor people's trust, sucked the vote out of them every five years then left them to their own devices.
                Wignall still letting his focus on the poor steer his viewpoint. If these people are gangsters and have been used in the past to hustle or intimidate votes out of these people what makes anyone think these gangsters have any concern over the ultimate well being of these people outside of those who are family and colleagues? Rather than having "enough of the stale and tired political leadership" isn't it far more likely that by late 2008 these street forces and their leaders were realizing that they were becoming more independent of the politicians and indeed that the tail was about to wag the dog and the gangsters were about to control the politicians? Why would any organized criminal gang "have enough of the stale and tired political leadership" when it is precisely that kind of leadership that allows their activities to flourish? It would actually be in their interest to ensure that the political leadership becomes even more tired and stale. After all if the political leadership was vibrant and innovative and attended to poor people's needs via facilitating job creation and properly funding education and utilizing tax money properly on public infrastructure and facilities then their (the organized criminals) entire way of life would be threatened (it would be much harder and more expensive to secure bribes, recruit from and to exploit these people).

                Originally posted by Mark Wignall
                As those street forces increased their trade in illicit drugs, more arms were brought in and the extortion racket, otherwise known as 'tax', was partitioned off along PNP and JLP lines. Much more importantly, the dons became the effective government as most of these taxes were used to fund the poor and send their children to school, feed them and assist in dealing with health matters and the funerals of old people.
                Except that simply feeding people and sending their children to chronically underfunded schools in a chronically underfunded education system and dealing with some health matters and funerals is not really looking out for the ultimate well being and advancement of these people anymore than slave owners were interested in the ultimate well being and advancement of their slaves? Slaves were fed too. Slaves also had their health taken of (the extent to which depending on the personality of the slave owner and of course all slaves were subject to abuse at the hands of their masters and overseers in order to keep them psychologically enslaved and force work out of them, but for those slave masters a dead slave was as good as a dead horse). Slaves were even educated up to a point, the point necessary for them to be able to understand what was required to and to carry out their tasks. In our current educational environment many children will not get the kind of education required to make them the next Steve Jobs, Denzel Washington, Craig Venter or Warren Buffet. I've heard some teachers (family and their associates) talk about the horrible spelling for some SBAs (with one example being the constant use of "Spainish" and "competers" in some written submissions). Maybe if we had loads of oil (enough to make Saudi Arabia jealous) then some of these kids could become like George W. Bush with his "Grecians" but for the most part they will not be facilitated to any great degree by a chronically underfunded educational environment. Now maybe if the dons paid the teachers' salaries and bought the latest equipment and material for all the schools.......


                Originally posted by Mark Wignall
                In 1984, after Shower Posse (muscle) leader Lester Lloyd 'Jim Brown' Coke left Tivoli Gardens with many goons and guns and, in the aftermath, eight men in nearby Rema were shot dead, then Prime Minister Eddie Seaga and other senior JLP ministers drank beer with him in Rema after the predictable not-guilty verdict. To Seaga, it was his way of brokering the peace between the JLP factions in Rema and Tivoli.

                In 1991, Seaga attended the funeral of Jim Brown after a mysterious fire consumed him while he was in a jail cell awaiting extradition. And yet, three years later, that same Seaga had the temerity to draft a list of 13 'troublemakers' from Tivoli, a list which included Brown's son, 25-year-old Christopher 'Dudus' Coke.

                My question to Seaga is, what made Jim Brown palatable to you in the years leading up to 1991 but yet, you could not find common cause with Dudus? Many know the answers, but of course you are as quiet as a church mouse.
                And with this, Wignall is still somehow amazed that Peter Phillips referred to Haggart as a "corner youth". When has Seaga ever called Jim Brown a murderer and a gunman? These politicians might be crazy for hugging up criminals but they are foolish enough (or brave enough) yet to openly refer to them criminals because they know they will lose non-garrison votes.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mark Wignall
                  Did known JLP funders assist Peter Phillips?


                  .....In the 2008 presidential race between Portia Simpson Miller and Dr Peter Phillips, funding was always going to be a problem because very few were prepared to spend money on a party which had just lost a general election.
                  It was no secret that the JLP would always prefer to see Peter Phillips as PNP president than Portia Simpson Miller whom they quite rightly saw as a more formidable candidate because of her ready appeal to the so-called 'masses'.

                  In this connection a JLP source 'pushed something under my door', hardly earth-shattering, that in the 2008 PNP internal elections Dr Peter Phillips had approached a certain JLP person with a view to seeking funding for him through JLP sources which were thought to be cash rich. According to the document 'pushed under my door', significant funding was obtained for Dr Phillips.

                  When I spoke to Dr Phillips on Thursday he told me a slightly different story. While he did not call a name, he said, "It was they (the JLP) who approached me, in a very informal setting and offered to assist me. They gave me a set of names and on the list were some people whom I had already approached. Plus, many promised but nothing materialised. Is there something wrong with that?"

                  I agree with Dr Phillips that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, but I couldn't help but wonder if some of those contributors were among those who contributed to the JLP in the Manatt, Phelps & Phillips matter.
                  Further confirmation that the JLP and PNP are two sides of the same coin; the JLPNP with the NDM as the tiny inscription on the edge.

                  It might be some of the contributors to the JLP in the Manatt matter who contributed to Phillips. It would give a possible explanation of where Phillips got the Manatt information from, especially if the contributor or contributors were unhappy with what their money was ultimately used for in the Manatt matter. Otherwise it wouldn't make much sense for them to contribute to the Manatt engagement as something that the JLP needed and then turn around and facilitate its public airing to the detriment of the JLP.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mark Wignall
                    A first step in 'dismantling' garrisons

                    My friend, Denzil 'Wizzy' McDonald, an ardent supporter of the PNP, had a telephone conversation with me last week. I expressed the view that the JLP Cabinet should convince the prime minister to eventually divest himself of the West Kingston constituency where he has been made persona non grata and seek a seat in one of the new ones being formed. Wizzy dismissed my argument and put forward a different solution.

                    Many people who are fed up of garrison politics and the rule of the gun simplistically believe that the garrisons can be dismantled by political decree, that is, sing some hymns, read a few Bible verses and tell the people to love PNP and JLP. It is much bigger than that because there are people living in those enclaves who will vote either PNP or JLP even if they travel to Jupiter.

                    According to Wizzy, the Electoral Commission should make a close examination of these constituencies and carefully carve and create new physical boundaries where each new constituency will have about a 50:50 split of JLP and PNP voters. "What that would do is force the representative to make an equal appeal to ALL voters across the political divide. They would have to work their butts off to secure the vote and only results would matter in that case."

                    It would not be easy, of course, but it would be a meaningful start.
                    Exactly. Just as X and I have been calling for. But it would be a start only. Afterwards the constituency boundaries would have to be changed frequently so that the politicians are always kept on their toes and won't be afforded the chance to change these new re-drawn non-garrisons into garrisons again (through bribery and facilitating some kind of demographic shift).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Bwoy it seems like unnu get too smart. How can you change constituency frequently? Which other country do that and that within itself cause instability and the electorial office will be accused of siding with one camp or another.
                      • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Which planet are you from ? its either you want to change the shitstem are just say you are comfortable with it .

                        It doesnt take a brain surgeon to figure out how to fix our problem , the question is do we have the political will ?
                        THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                        "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                        "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It is not about wanting to change the system it is about making sensible laws and holding people accountable. Again which other country constantly change their electorial borders?
                          • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ReggaeMike View Post
                            Exactly. Just as X and I have been calling for. But it would be a start only. Afterwards the constituency boundaries would have to be changed frequently so that the politicians are always kept on their toes and won't be afforded the chance to change these new re-drawn non-garrisons into garrisons again (through bribery and facilitating some kind of demographic shift).
                            Absent a massive community development/education/jobs initiative in garrisons (maybe US$1B over 15 years or so) to replace the rotten power structure created by political/criminal elements....I think this and any attempt to de-construct garrisons would have the effect of promoting instability and more violence to restore the "one order" that the political criminals crave.

                            We need investment in people and social capital much more than we need gerrymandered constituencies or more investment in fancy highways to "give people a good impression of Jamaica".

                            The idea of security forces "smashing" garrisons is ridiculous as well.... we breed criminals faster than we can smash them...in fact the act of smashing accelerates the criminal production line.
                            TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

                            Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

                            D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              some of the criminals have to die but it has to be surgical. In return for what is given there must be demands of the people as well.
                              • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X