Would it be acceptable to use "War" tactics to fight crime?

[Rockman]

The Govt is in trouble for bending the rules now we are going to allow its agents to bend the rules too?This HUGE moral issue suddenly takes a rhatid backseat.



Blessed

[OJ]

that is the mistake we have been making for years. How many m16 or mpps you see in downtown london. You need good laws and good enforcement. Look at what the pm has done.. protected an individual that community that has illegal blockade and shot up army vehicle.. IN the u.s.a that would label such people domestic terrorist and you would get the full nine and any funding tied to that group gone or you investigated if remotely related to them. Now how would that work in ja seen the pm relationship. If their was rico law or the anti-gang law i ja as it is in canada and the usa.. bruce would be in handcuffs.

[Karl]

By resources, I thinking of money for the most part, but weaponry comes into that, but would you say the police/army are adequately armed to win a "war" against the gun men?

Yes!
as fact I know that they are more than adequately armed!

That nonsense about the criminals have a number of .50 calibre shooting guns is a nonsense argument. Those guns would be mere irritants to properly planned and executed actions against those in whose hands they are.

[1of1]

eeeh when dat 50 bus, it nuh normal, surely more than an irritant