RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gordon Brown to resign as party leader

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gordon Brown to resign as party leader

    ....some of our politicians need to take the appropriate lessons from this

    Gordon Brown 'stepping down as Labour leader'

    Gordon Brown has said he is stepping down as Labour Party leader - as his party opens formal talks with the Lib Dems about forming a government.

    Mr Brown, prime minister since 2007, said he hoped a successor as Labour leader would be in place by September.

    The Lib Dems have been negotiating for days with the Tories - who won the most seats and votes in the UK election.

    But the Lib Dems have asked for formal talks with Labour. Mr Brown said it was in the "national interest" to respond.

    Mr Brown's statement will be seen as a move to smooth the way to a deal between Labour and the Liberal Democrats to form a government.

    Voters' judgement

    It comes after Lib Dem MPs urged their leader Nick Clegg and his negotiating team to continue to listen to Labour, while seeking further clarification from the Tories about key areas of policy.

    In his statement in Downing Street, Mr Brown said Britain had a "parliamentary and not presidential system" and said there was a "progressive majority" of voters.


    I will play no part in that contest, I will back no individual candidate
    Gordon Brown


    He said if the national interest could be best served by a coalition between the Lib Dems and Labour - he said he would "discharge that duty to form that government".

    But he added that no party had won an overall majority in the UK general election and, as Labour leader, he had to accept that as a judgement on him.

    "I therefore intend to ask the Labour Party to set in train the processes needed for its own leadership election.

    "I would hope that it would be completed in time for the new leader to be in post by the time of the Labour Party conference.

    "I will play no part in that contest, I will back no individual candidate."

    Formal process

    Lib Dem leader Mr Clegg had requested formal negotiations with Labour and it was "sensible and in the national interest" to respond positively to the request, Mr Brown said.

    He said the Cabinet would meet soon and a "formal policy negotiation process" would be established.

    It emerged earlier that the Lib Dem negotiating team, who have held days of talks with the Conservatives, had also met senior Labour figures in private.

    The BBC's political editor Nick Robinson said one of the stumbling blocks to any Lib Dem-Labour deal had been Mr Brown himself.

    John Mann, the first Labour MP to call for him to go after the election result, said Mr Brown had made a "wise and brave" decision.

    The Tories secured 306 of the 649 constituencies contested on 6 May. It leaves the party short of the 326 MPs needed for an outright majority, with the Thirsk and Malton seat - where the election was postponed after the death of a candidate - still to vote.

    Labour finished with 258 MPs, down 91, the Lib Dems 57, down five, and other parties 28.

    If Labour and the Lib Dems joined forces, they would still not have an overall majority.

    With the support of the Northern Irish SDLP, one Alliance MP, and nationalists from Scotland and Wales they would reach 328, rising to 338 if the DUP, the independent unionist and the new Green MP joined them.
    TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

    Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

    D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

  • #2
    a VERY good move!

    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

    Comment


    • #3
      This is what I was talking about when I say that our current crop of politicians have corrupted a very workable system (which is more or less successful in a number of other countries including India, Barbados, Canada, Mauritius and the UK) and will likely corrupt any other system chosen or imposed. If we need a system where everything has to be spelt out in the most minute details (and note that the US system does NOT do that; it has a VERY short constitution relative to many other countries and the other laws governing its system are not hard to change) so that politicians don't get a chance to subvert the system then it means we as a people are not ready for self-government. No system will ever be fool-proof from corruption as long as there are people who are already corrupt or who are willing to be corrupted and these people are willing to subvert the system to further their corrupt goals.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ReggaeMike View Post
        This is what I was talking about when I say that our current crop of politicians have corrupted a very workable system (which is more or less successful in a number of other countries including India, Barbados, Canada, Mauritius and the UK) and will likely corrupt any other system chosen or imposed. If we need a system where everything has to be spelt out in the most minute details (and note that the US system does NOT do that; it has a VERY short constitution relative to many other countries and the other laws governing its system are not hard to change) so that politicians don't get a chance to subvert the system then it means we as a people are not ready for self-government. No system will ever be fool-proof from corruption as long as there are people who are already corrupt or who are willing to be corrupted and these people are willing to subvert the system to further their corrupt goals.
        you are 100% correct.... the political and business class are corrupt and will corrupt any system....which is why outside influence & money is indispensable for Jamaica to change

        A 3rd party honest broker funded by expats is a possible way out of the maze.
        TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

        Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

        D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

        Comment


        • #5
          He has no choice. He ran away Blair and nuff a the party don't see him as a good choice.
          • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

          Comment


          • #6
            suh when the jlp lose election after election with seaga...why him neva just step?! that is the difference . . . . .

            Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

            Comment


            • #7
              True. Him believe he was the choosen one. Him coulda do like him friend from St. Lucia Sir John Compton. Let is go and if it go bad him step right back in but he just believed he was the only leader in Jamaica.
              • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yes, Seaga is a perfect example of the difference in attitude between Jamaica (where the system has been corrupted) and places like Britain and Canada (where it hasn't). Seaga ran for election after election as head of his party and prime-minister in waiting but his party didn't gain a majority in any of those 3 or 4 elections. In a lot of other places after a second straight election defeat, a leader would have stepped aside. Seaga isn't the only example though. Portia is another as is Michael Manley (although he lucked out in having Seaga become so unpopular that he basically coasted back in) and it all starts with the example set by Bustamante who was too ill to really lead the country in early 1964, yet never stepped down as PM until 1967 (after the next general elections) and had Sangster be Acting PM for about 3 years (which was most of Bustamante's term). There is no way that Blair would hang on to the Prime Ministership officially for 3 years if he was too ill and have his deputy be strung along for all that time. Then again of course, British people probably wouldn't tolerate it and would simply vote Blair's party out of office in the next election.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Nigeria was about to do the same with Yar'Adua. Goodluck Johnathan was acting for quite a while, while the president did all he could to prevent or delay his death. I think Manly stepped aside once his medical problems started getting the better of him, so to speak.

                  Many just don't know when to say when. A suh Jamaica politics sweet!?!?


                  BLACK LIVES MATTER

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    One thing, nuff people nuh like the tories but they wanted a reason to vote for labour but with Gordon Brown not even Blair light it was going to be an uphill task in a recession year.
                    • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X