RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Manatt - 1st time in 20 yrs individual named as gov contact

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
  • #31
    His lawyers? You mean Mannatt? Could you show me the law that says it is illegal for Dudus to hire a law firm to lobby on his behalf.

    Comment

    • #32
      No law saying he cannot ask government to pay for said lawyer, or Gov to seek representation for him , or defend him , none whatsoever, he is a citizen and deserves every right to be defended by GOV.

      No law against the consequences that will follow also.
      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

      Comment

      • #33
        Huh ?

        You have a problem with the management of the country thus far ?

        Please expand...

        Comment

        • #34
          Originally posted by Maudib View Post
          Huh ?

          You have a problem with the management of the country thus far ?

          Please expand...
          Come on now! Yuh nuh notice the trend? All we hear about is how incompetent the gov't is and when cornered like roach in a corner the houdini line is it was because of programs started under the previous admin.
          "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

          Comment

          • #35
            Yuh mean like Operation Pride ?

            Nice program.. woeful execution..

            Am I to believe that people after 18 years of one brand of PNP, still don't get it ?

            If you tell me they refuse to get it.. well that I can believe...

            Comment

            • #36
              Originally posted by Lazie View Post
              .. and the last time I checked, it wasn't the gov't that hired the law firm. But of course all of you have the same ulterior motive so leaving out certain details fit the agenda.
              ...the last time you checked?

              Your Likle Brucie said there was no contact made with the legal firm. The legal firm says otherwise!
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment

              • #37
                Originally posted by ReggaeMike View Post
                Yup and Watergate wasn't broken into by the US government but merely by CREEPy people (folks from the "Committee to RE-Elect the President") and if I'm not mistaken there was no US government letterhead confirming any ties with the CRP/CREEP or payments to them. Does that mean people in the US government weren't involved in some way? If you believe that then Nixon was most innocent president the US has ever had.
                Good one!

                Maudib and Lazie live sheltered lives...or they lie to themselves!
                "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                Comment

                • #38
                  Originally posted by Lazie View Post
                  What I find strange is out of all that was said in the interview your source only informed you of what sounded controversial at the time, but choose either not to hear or inform you of other details of the interview.
                  So your questioning my motives when I'm the one being told about the interview by someone else? Are you on crack?

                  do you expect that people will give you 100% of the information in passing comments?

                  Not that I expect you to answer these questions anymore since I've long since realized you runaway from them despite others at least making attempts to answer your questions.

                  Lets see, you're the one arguing from a point of ignorance, yet you're calling someone else a jackass? Clever.
                  Well only a jackass would:

                  1. claim to be "calling out" someone for NOT writing about something that they were never told anything about (and at the same time acknowledging that said person did not know anything about it as you have just done).

                  2. tell someone that the information they are asking about today was broadcast on multiple newscasts (which are not available for download or rebroadcast) yesterday as though the person has superpowers or a time-machine.

                  Up to now you still haven't explained how it is that you expected me to write a proper summary of the interview including the bits on what the AG said about the legality of the evidence when as I long since acknowledged I wasn't told about that part. Now for someone who claims victimization and bias on the part of other posters you had a golden opportunity to actually tell me more about it and I distinctly recall asking you to provide more info about it. Now that's really strange. You talk on and on about how people only cite the parts that "fit their agenda" but then when someone asks you for more information concerning things that supposedly wouldn't "fit their agenda" you remain as silent as mouse and then bray like a jackass about how they ignore the very bits of information that only you were in a position to provide. I feel sorry for all your elders (parents and teachers) because I can't imagine anyone could be THAT dumb and still manage to type.


                  Let's put it this way. If 2 weeks before Samuda's news release I had said of you:

                  "Same way you were able to provide an 'overview' of the Manatt deal, yet completely left out what Samuda said about the involvement of JLP members"

                  It would amount to the same thing since 2 weeks before Samuda's news release you and I were ignorant of the confirmed involvement of JLP members other than Harold Brady. It would be ridiculous of me then to "call you out" on information which you knowingly acknowledge that you were ignorant of. You can try and turn this about any way you want, but what you did was disrespectful and just downright silly if not stupid.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Karl View Post
                    Good one!

                    Maudib and Lazie live sheltered lives...or they lie to themselves!
                    No. Lazie is just stupid. Have you seen what he then said? Calling me out for NOT writing about something I wasn't fully informed about (and about which I incidentally asked HIM for more information about and which he never gave a reply to).

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Stop call the man name ...Just call dem laborite..lol...thats the tribalist in me ..hehe got that from my grandfather.
                      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                      Comment

                      Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                      Working...
                      X