As the new Brady Bunch saga continues I read this story and thought the last bit of the section I'm going to quote was most interesting:
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/glean...ead/lead2.html
Private client? Mistaken for the GOJ? And being advised on "existing political and economic matters, including existing treaty agreements between Jamaica and the U.S."?
curiouser and curiouser....
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/glean...ead/lead2.html
Gov't Needs More Answers From Brady
Published: Thursday | April 8, 20105 Comments and 0 Reactions
Attorney-at-law Harold Brady.
Attorney-at-law Harold Brady has failed to convince Solicitor General Douglas Leys that the American law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips had corrected the "false claim" that it had been contracted to represent the Jamaican Government.
But the Bruce Golding administration is yet to decide if it will exercise its option of taking action against the attorney.
"I can't tell you what action is being considered ... but I'm sure that you will hear after everything is perused as to what the actions are, if any," Daryl Vaz, the minister with responsibility for information, told a post-Cabinet media briefing yesterday.
Vaz was responding to a barrage of questions from journalists anxious for the latest information on the controversy which was sparked by Dr Peter Phillips, a senior opposition member of parliament.
Claims denied
Phillips last month raised questions about reports that the United States (US) law firm had been contracted by the Government to assist in the impasse surrounding the American's request for the extradition of west Kingston strongman Christopher 'Dudus' Coke.
Government and Brady denied the claims.
Under fire, Brady argued that the law firm had made a mistake when it filed documents with the US Department of Justice saying that it was contracted by his law firm, Harold Brady and Company, on behalf of the Jamaican Government.
According to Brady, this was corrected last year after he pointed out that he was acting on behalf of a private client.
Published: Thursday | April 8, 20105 Comments and 0 Reactions
Attorney-at-law Harold Brady.
Attorney-at-law Harold Brady has failed to convince Solicitor General Douglas Leys that the American law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips had corrected the "false claim" that it had been contracted to represent the Jamaican Government.
But the Bruce Golding administration is yet to decide if it will exercise its option of taking action against the attorney.
"I can't tell you what action is being considered ... but I'm sure that you will hear after everything is perused as to what the actions are, if any," Daryl Vaz, the minister with responsibility for information, told a post-Cabinet media briefing yesterday.
Vaz was responding to a barrage of questions from journalists anxious for the latest information on the controversy which was sparked by Dr Peter Phillips, a senior opposition member of parliament.
Claims denied
Phillips last month raised questions about reports that the United States (US) law firm had been contracted by the Government to assist in the impasse surrounding the American's request for the extradition of west Kingston strongman Christopher 'Dudus' Coke.
Government and Brady denied the claims.
Under fire, Brady argued that the law firm had made a mistake when it filed documents with the US Department of Justice saying that it was contracted by his law firm, Harold Brady and Company, on behalf of the Jamaican Government.
According to Brady, this was corrected last year after he pointed out that he was acting on behalf of a private client.
curiouser and curiouser....
Comment