RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PM defends Trafigu****

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PM defends Trafigu****

    PM defends Trafigura

    published: Sunday | December 10, 2006 <DIV class=KonaBody xtUVI="true">


    Campbell

    Tyrone Reid, Enterprise Reporter

    In defence of the controversial Trafigura transaction which rocked her administration a month ago, Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller, called her political opponents two-faced, and suggested that the manner in which the People's National Party (PNP) accepted the donation from the Dutch oil trading company was par for the course. </DIV>

    "You know that politicians are very hypocritical ... every political party in Jamaica takes money from business people, and they cannot give the political (party's account number) because people say that they not giving any money unless you give us an account," she said, while addressing a meeting of workers from the ministries and state agencies under her portfolio two weeks ago.

    Because of the country's political climate, she argued, political parties have to devise ingenious ways to secure funding.

    "Some send the money through lawyers and the lawyers reissue the money to the political parties. Some open up foundations (and) trusts to get money because the people do not want their business to be associated with (any one political party)."

    Political climate

    The Trafigura Beheer scandal was first uncovered by the Opposition in October, when it revealed information that the Dutch oil trading company had deposited $31 million into a PNP account belonging to Colin Campbell, the then Minister of Information and Development. The scandal resulted in the resignation of Mr. Campbell, who was also the PNP's general secretary.

    At that time PNP officials claimed the money was a contribution to the party, but Trafigura denied the claims and said the transaction was purely commercial. This is in apparent reference to a dummy arrangement, to pay the Colin Campbell-affiliated company for contracted professional services. However, the Dutch company later reneged and said that the transaction was actually a donation.

    Mrs. Simpson Miller, who had earlier ordered that the $31 million be returned, argued Friday that corporate Jamaica are forced to operate in this manner because they are unsure which party will win any given election and are afraid of being "victimised for life" if the party they did not support won the election.

    Possible backlash

    Beverley Lopez, president of the Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica (PSOJ), confirmed that members of corporate Jamaica are concerned about donating to political parties because of possible backlash.

    "There is always an actual fear in Jamaica of reprisals, that is peculiar to Jamaica. because of the state of politics in Jamaica people are concerned," she told The Sunday Gleaner on Wednesday.

    Ms. Lopez said that the PSOJ has no protocol in place that governs how its members donate to political parties. However, one is in its embryonic stage. "We have started discussions, but we have not moved forward," she said.

    The PSOJ president argued that not even trusts and foundations are secure, as not many things are kept secret in Jamaica. "If you donate to a trust fund there is still a paper trail because it is still linked to the politician."

    Ms. Lopez suggested that the recently installed Electoral Commission should be responsible for collecting all political donations and then passing it on to the relevant party.

    While he admitted that the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) does set up trusts and foundations to accept donations, Bruce Golding, Leader of the Opposition, said that the Prime Minister's attempt to justify the Trafigura scandal is disappointing.

    "There is no way that it can be powere
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

  • #2
    RE: PM defends Trafigu****

    published: Saturday | December 9, 2006
    The Editor, Sir:

    "He who pays the piper calls the tune". In fact, the piper, if not directed, will play the tune that he believes his sponsors wish to hear. Currently corruption seems to be deeply embedded in our political system because in order for candidates and ultimately the party to win an election they have to be good at 'shaking down' big money interests for cash locally and internationally.

    A system that forces candidates to seek their funding from private interests is seriously exposed to having economic and regulatory policies being crafted in response to demands from these large donors or being drafted by the donors themselves. It is campaign contributions going in and the state becoming beholden for a candidate or a party's indiscretions.

    According to a study done by Sarah Anderson and John Cavanagh of the Institute for Policy Studies, which was embargoed until December 4, 2000, of the 100 largest organisations in the world, 51 are corporations. Some corporations are now larger than countries or regions. This growing private power has enormous economic consequences.

    However, it seems that the greatest impact may be political, as corporations transform economic clout into political power.

    A country's privatisation policy, its health policy, and its energy policy, its food security policy, ICT, everything could be taken over by special interests.

    As unrelated as it may seem higher prices, double payment for services, rapacious interest rates, the inability to institute mandatory labelling of experimental foods, the lack of a biodiversity policy could all be connected to inappropriate campaign financing. Remove the private financing interest from the system and significantly reduce the incentive for corruption.

    We are calling for regulation of political parties and public financing of elections. We believe that these extravagant conferences and massive advertising campaigns are not only unnecessary and a waste of money, but also put us deeper in debt to the special interests.

    Under public financing, these would disappear and candidates would have to debate issues and plans, and establish social contracts with the people they seek to represent. Like free education it's not whether it is affordable, rather it's that we cannot afford not to have it.

    I am, etc.,

    CARLTON STEWART

    President, National Consumers' League

    natconle@cwjamaica.com

    29 Beechwood Avenue, Kingston 5
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #3
      RE: PM defends Trafigu****

      So our PM is now defending corruption? Why did Colin resign? What is the hanky panky AJ mentioned? Why Portia say the money should be returned?
      "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

      Comment


      • #4
        RE: PM defends Trafigu****

        Lazie (12/10/2006)So our PM is now defending corruption? Why did Colin resign? What is the hanky panky AJ mentioned? Why Portia say the money should be returned?
        You read that report to say our PM was defending corruption?

        Could you kindly give us a look into your mind/way of thinking that led you to come to that conclusion? Thanks!
        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

        Comment


        • #5
          RE: PM defends Trafigu****

          reading is over rated.

          Comment


          • #6
            RE: PM defends Trafigu****

            You've proven that time and again.
            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

            Comment


            • #7
              RE: PM defends Trafigu****

              and as I said; reading is overrated.

              Comment

              Working...
              X