RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMERICA'S GREAT DELUSIONAL MOMENT Sunday, January 31, 2010

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMERICA'S GREAT DELUSIONAL MOMENT Sunday, January 31, 2010

    AMERICA'S GREAT DELUSIONAL MOMENT

    Sunday, January 31, 2010
    With the election of Barack Obama to the post of president of the United States in November 2008, and even during the period of the two-year campaign leading up to what many saw as the inevitability of an improbable happening, peoples of the world were focused on US politics as never before in their lives.

    OBAMA... the tendency of some Americans to dub him leftist is seen as really comical
    1/2
    Quite apart from Obama's skin colour, many were made to understand the terminology used to describe American voters, in addition to gaining an appreciation that party politics anywhere on this planet is not a schoolgirl outing.

    We discovered that anyone described as liberal or leftist was someone who had too much focus on the human factor while the whole conservative movement was peopled by those who saw big business and unbridled capitalism as the holy grail of all existence.

    Where liberals were less inclined to wage wars on foreign soil, conservatives saw these campaigns as an extension of the strength of America, which of course included the increased viability of the military industrial complex.

    In the 1970s when Michael Manley was carrying out his democratic socialist experiment in Jamaica, the term 'leftist' referred to someone who would say 'Esteemed Comrade Brezhnev' at the drop of a hat, don a beret Che Guevara-style, could not sell two patties to make a profit, but would be prepared to take up arms and ammunition and head for a cave in Wareika Hills. Such a person would preach of the evils of capitalism while drinking his Johnny Walker Black in his cave.

    So, to us, the tendency of some Americans to dub Obama leftist is seen as really comical and even stupid.

    If we accept the fact that an intellectual is one who understands his country's role in geo-politics and the global economy, and who also appreciates and has attempted to define human behaviour in this global soup kitchen and in his own country, then it could mean that America is not exactly the country that is overrun with intellectuals; academics maybe, but not intellectuals.

    With 300 million people, America can afford to have more than its fair share of those who believe that the source of a banana and a pineapple is 'the store', those overdosed on Biblical apocalyptic expectations and others who figure that Hawaii, a state of America, is probably somewhere in the Caribbean.

    With 300 million people, a history based on greatness and inventiveness and innovation, and with more than a significant percentage of its population as the 'thinking class', America can afford to 'carry' the majority of those whose eyes fit neatly into a myopic and xenophobic pair of spectacles.

    Obama's actions in trying to push through universal health care has been fought tooth and nail by the GOP, their 'tea baggers' and right-wing nuts like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck. The real opposition are the big private health care insurance companies and their allies in Congress. Greeted with a baptism of fire in the form of the US-induced global recession, his attempts to push-start the economy by plunging huge quantities of taxpayers' dollars into the banking sector and the auto industry have not earned him credits other than the label 'socialist'.

    America prides itself on its ability to view its own country from the thickness of its own forest. With the recession winding down, there are those in America who believe that that great country will return to business as usual once the recession really ends. They believe that the jobs will come back along with the perks.

    On the other hand, there are those who see things differently, if not in the same light as President Sarkozy of France, UK's Prime Minister Gordon Brown, President of the World Bank Robert Zoellick and lately our own prime minister, Bruce Golding, who have all been calling for a reform of the world economic order.

    As Golding said recently, "When globalisation was ushered in as a new theatre of economic opportunity, for countries that had been left behind for so long, we were led to believe that this would be the stepping stone for countries that were serious to begin to experience something that had eluded us for so long. The fundamental unevenness of the world remains; 40 per cent share five per cent of income, and the richest 20 per cent enjoy 75 per cent of income."

    Is America's geo-political space being threatened?

    Very few of us believe that America is going to roll over and play dead any time soon. It still has the power to create fiat money and give guarantees of the holy greenback's redemption.

    But people such as Doug Halsall, chairman and CEO of a Jamaican company, Advanced Integrated Systems, believes that the mighty US may be headed for only a fictional representation of its past glory.

    Recently, he wrote a letter to Rachel Maddow, host of the Rachel Maddow Show broadcast on MSNBC. It is my view that his letter should be required reading for politicians and public officials in the USA. It should also be carefully read by our home-grown leaders who like to remind us that America, the biggest economy in the world, is quite close to us.
    It is somewhat lengthy, so I will quote only parts of it.

    "Whereas I fully understand the impatience with Obama by main street America in getting America back to the halcyon days of sub-six per cent unemployment and surpluses, I am more and more convinced that this unrealistic expectation could herald in a period of one-term presidents.

    Main Street remains convinced that the status quo which obtained prior to the recession is redeemable in the short term; oblivious of the fact that the fundamental relationships of the system that gave birth and sustenance to that relatively long period of abundance in America has been eroded, mainly because of greed, abuse and short-sightedness on the part of those 'interests' who were, and still are, the major beneficiaries of a society now in decline.

    "Simply put, the USA's bubble has burst (or is at best losing air fast) -- and that's the primary cause, not the housing bubble, nor the dot-com, nor sub-prime nor any other; those are mere symptoms, but the USA's bubble, the system that was and now, to a lesser extent, is the envy of the world.
    "Manufacturing and allied industries, which in the post-world war era created the 'real' wealth, surpluses and consequent high demand for the trappings of fine living, that in turn created more jobs in other lifestyle support sectors, became the nucleus that was primarily responsible for the evolution of the large, confident, highly productive and financially secure middle class in the then job-rich upwardly mobile USA."

    Two years ago I spoke to a cashier at a lunch checkout counter in southern USA. Her major complaint was, "We can't get no credit." It occurred to me then that a Jamaican cashier would not have had that complaint simply because she probably never even saw a credit card in her life. Halsall handles the issue more eloquently than I do, but it pretty much boils down to the same thing.

    As Halsall zeroed in on the cause of the meltdown, he suggested that it could have happened before 2008 and gave his reasons for saying this. "This recent financial meltdown, resulting in the massive decline in jobs, would have been experienced even earlier than 2008, but for extended demand that eroding savings financed, credit -- backed by the unrealistic valuation of real estate, corrupt mortgage and other credit qualification practices, etc, thereby facilitating sustained purchases, mostly involving high contents of products produced OUTSIDE of the USA."

    In other words, while American households enjoyed an orgy of consumption, it paid little attention to its consumption of home-produced goods. In any event, these purchases were backed based on 'virtual' money, created in the offices of Wall Street wizards who chose to see no further than their fat bonuses.

    Halsall continued, "Your financial sector finds it more attractive to create 'virtual' wealth from high-risk derivatives and other such investments than to practise traditional banking that once 'red-carpeted' the American entrepreneurial spirit and the cornucopia of innovations that made America great. Consequently, both innovation and jobs, which were once fuelled by a dynamic small business sector - America's only hope for revival in the medium term - suffers. The red alert is this: like any living organism, if this entrepreneurial spirit is stifled for any sustained period, it will surely die."
    Obama trapped by the power of 'special interests'

    One is not too sure of the extent to which our local business elite and political leaders have assimilated the recession and how they expect the trading relationships between the USA and Jamaica to be, once the world is fully out of the recession.

    Even though our exports to the US have never been spectacular, one senses that our political leaders are waiting for the jigsaw pieces to fit together again without considering that the rules of the game may have changed.

    Halsall noted that, "Main Street's conviction, however, is that your president has access to some economic and other levers which, in less than a year, should have been effectively manipulated to reinstate the status quo, or at the very least, have had the ship of state turned around and visibly steaming full speed ahead to this utopia of near-zero unemployment and a significantly declining debt. And although many wise persons on both sides of the political fence may very well recognise this, it is not politically expedient for either side to present this axiom to Main Street."

    Right here at home, we saw the result of the negotiations -- the Debt Exchange -- with the big financial players and how it annoyed the Opposition PNP, simply because the Government had appeared to have awakened from its slumber of the previous 18 months. While no one is insane enough to believe that the programme will not need the best technical and political management, the PNP could only offer a lukewarm criticism of it because it is not in the nature of our politicians to be nationalistic.

    Halsall drew parallels: "America therefore has become as partisan in
    its political behaviour as any of us Third World nations. Where are the great statesmen of the past who thought primarily of the next generation? Your politicians, like ours, think only of the next election... and 'Special Interests' whom they depend on to finance their election.

    "In this type of thinking, they fail to recognise that the backbone which supported this quality lifestyle in the past - a competitive, secure, local manufacturing and export sector, has been outsourced by the very interests that were the main beneficiaries of a large middle class with great purchasing power, supported by secure and well-paid manufacturing and associated jobs. Was this not short-term thinking born of greed and myopia, or was it natural evolution in a more competitive, complex and inter-related post-cold war world?

    "In outsourcing manufacturing, America also outsourced the associated technology and so too the ability to develop and improve, to countries which learned well from the USA that human capital is a prerequisite to all other capital and, consequently, was able to extract far more from the value chain. In the process they are increasingly becoming the producers (creators of wealth) and America the distributors and consumers. Indeed, so successful have countries like China become that their challenge is now tied up with yours, but only in the sense that they now have to buy your debt so that America can continue to prolong its lifestyle and thereby import their goods. So now they, like India, Brazil, etc, are working on increasing their own domestic demand by improving their domestic standard of living, in order that they may absorb the phenomenal growth in production and productivity."

    Halsall's analytically presented and eloquently expressed position sees no good news for those who believe that the magic of Obama will return America to the days prior to the onset of the US-induced global recession. That, of course, cannot be good news to us in the short term if we also believe that the former arrangements will return.

    "In my view, the halcyon days seem irretrievable, by Obama or any other, as you have become the victim of that which made you great and now, like most Third World countries, you are in a debt trap. Debt that was used not for capacity building, infrastructure nor your human capital, but war, consumption, satisfying the behest of big business, and 'currying favour' with the rich. Interest expense, which is fast becoming one of your largest budgetary items, as is for us, can only be eliminated by discharging debt, and surpluses needed to do this can only come from excess revenue over expenses. Work the math."

    Who needs transformational leadership?

    While Halsall has never been a pitchman for doom and gloom, he has some sobering thoughts on America's realignment with itself, and in it, lies a part of our future.

    "Raising taxes is political suicide and may further exacerbate the problem of a depressed economy. Drastic cuts in expenditure, including withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan, has its obvious challenges and will not jump-start the economy. Indeed, it may very well bankrupt some of the industries that benefit from war and lobby generously for it continuously. Defence Budget seems to be sacrosanct. Without a surplus the debt cannot be retired or reduced... and ironically, like us Third World countries, you don't have the IMF to force your hand.

    "The transformational leadership that is required at this time to change America's imminent destiny - as Obama has now realised - will never be permitted by the 'special interests' which now control your Congress. As is wisely said, unbridled Capitalism is as destructive as unbridled Socialism.

    "And believe me Rachel, I take no pleasure in expressing this rationale. For quite some time I too avoided this conclusion and still hope time proves me wrong, because as you may know, when America sneezes, countries like Jamaica contract pneumonia. The world today is in one grand mess. I certainly don't envy your president, for no doubt he ponders these options and limitations daily. No doubt we are beginning to experience the realignment of the world. Let's hope for the rising tide that lifts all boats."
    Last edited by Karl; January 31, 2010, 01:48 PM.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    COLUMNS

    PROTECTING HAITI'S INTEREST

    Sunday, January 31, 2010
    IT would be ironic, if you like your irony flavoured with blood and disinfectant, to discover that moored off Port-au-Prince at this moment is the US hospital ship, the USS Comfort, one of two employed in 1994 as floating slave barracoons in Kingston Harbour. Today the Comfort is providing medical care for people injured in the great earthquake of January 12.
    In 1994, the Comfort and its consort functioned as temporary 'processing facilities' for Haitian refugees fleeing from a US-supported coup and attendant tyranny. The refugees had been picked up either on the high seas or in Jamaican waters, running for their lives from a US-backed hoodlum-state, whose favourite law and order procedures were murder by dismemberment and disembowelling with bodies left in the streets; and women and children beaten, publicly raped and disfigured and otherwise terrorised to encourage the others. Of those kidnapped either in Jamaican waters or on the high seas, 78.5 per cent were sent back to their murderers while the rest were sent to Guantanamo Bay.
    In this photo provided by the US Navy, medical professionals aboard the Military Sealift Command hospital ship USS Comfort treat a six-year-old Haitian boy Tuesday, January 19, 2010 in the casualty receiving room aboard the 1,000-bed hospital ship on the Atlantic Ocean. (Photo: AP)
    1/1
    This barbarous triage was a joint venture operated by President William Jefferson Clinton of the United States and Jamaican Prime Minister Percival James Patterson. It was ended by Clinton, who decided that he couldn't afford the death of a prominent black American leader on his record, if not on his conscience. Randall Robinson, president of TransAfrica, in one last desperate initiative, began a fast to the death in protest against his president's callous behaviour.
    Clinton had inherited "the Haitian problem" from his predecessor who could tolerate any number of fair-skinned Cubans dropping in on Miami Beach, but was revolted by the idea of Haitians doing the same thing. It didn't matter that the Cubans, like Jamaicans and Mexicans, were economic refugees while the Haitians were literally in fear of their lives.
    This point was made explicit in 2002 by a former US Ambassador to Haiti, Timothy Carney, at the launching of the Haiti Democracy Project, the most important US NGO operating in Haiti. The launching was at the Brookings Institution, one of the most eminent right-wing 'think tanks' in Washington. Carney said:
    "Ambassador Roger Noriega mentioned that one of our interests is to defend human rights, but he didn't mention the fundamental interest, which is to defend Miami Beach. We don't want Haitians on Miami Beach ... That is a fundamental interest of the United States ... Now that you have realised that interest, you hopefully will have policies by which Haitians can realise their prosperity and their future at home. " How do you do that? Well, we haven't figured that out yet, have we?"
    That was a job for the Haiti Democracy Project and other US-backed subversive NGOs whose function was simply to make sure that the president of Haiti, legally elected, would be unable to govern. These NGOs, dozens of them, using tactics honed in the 'peaceful overthrow' of former Communist states, didn't work well in Haiti; violence and provocation were introduced. The most effective weapon against Aristide were the press releases of the NGOs, swallowed whole by a criminally compliant US press. Even now, six years after Aristide was kidnapped by the then US ambassador, US news agencies are printing garbage about "Aristide, deposed amid a violent uprising." These days, the USS Comfort, Bill Clinton and PJ Patterson are back in the organised hypocrisy game, along with new players like Ban Ki-Moon who is proving as clueless about Haiti as his predecessor, Kofi Annan. Obama has brought back G W Bush, Condoleezza Rice's mouthpiece. No doubt there is room for old Haiti hands like Roger Noriega and Otto Reich. Pity they can't reanimate Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms, both eminent authorities on black people. But there's always Luigi Einaudi: "The only thing wrong with Haiti is that it is being run by Haitians."
    Encouraging News
    There is good news for those people, and there are many who worried that valuable American cash was being squandered on hapless Haitians who specialise in provoking Acts of God. The Associated Press reports: Only one cent of each dollar the US is spending on earthquake relief in Haiti is going in the form of cash to the Haitian government, according to an Associated Press review of relief efforts. Less than two weeks after President Obama announced an initial $100 million for Haiti earthquake relief, US government spending on the disaster has tripled to $317 million at latest count. That's just over $1 each from everyone in the United States. Relief experts say it would be a mistake to send too much direct cash to the Haitian government, which is in disarray and has a history of failure and corruption. "I really believe Americans are the most generous people who ever lived, but they want accountability," said Timothy R Knight, a former USAID assistant director who spent 25 years distributing disaster aid. "In this situation they're being very deliberate not to just throw money at the situation but to analyse based on a clear assessment and make sure that money goes to the best place possible." The AP review of federal budget spreadsheets, procurement reports and contract databases shows the vast majority of US funds going to established and tested providers, who are getting everything from 40-cent pounds of pinto beans to a $3.4-million barge into the disaster zone.
    So, the worry warts can rest. For one thing, the Canadians and Europeans have donated more per capita to Haitian relief than the US and deserve a larger part in the immediate relief works. Organisations like the Haiti Democracy Project and John McCain's International Republican Institute will make certain that American money is spent on strengthening American democracy and defeating the populist interests which have made governance in Haiti a problem ever since the peasant rebellion 90 years ago, which required the machine-gunning of entire villages to restore law and order. Meanwhile, the United States, Canada, France and the rest of the (rapidly diminishing) civilised world met in Montreal a few days ago to devise a plan for developing a Haiti for the Age of Globalisation. The participants were more or less the same countries who plotted to depose Aristide. "Shortly after Aristide's overwhelming victory in Haiti's first democratic presidential election in 1990, the relicts of the Jim Crow Marine occupation managed to convince the Americans, first John McCain's International Republican Institute and then elements of Bill Clinton's government and various Canadian politico and officials, that Haiti under Aristide was a threat to civilisation as they knew it...
    "Denis Paradis, a Canadian minister, convened a coven of like-minded fascists, "who decided that Aristide must go, and the Canadians and Americans through the Canadian aid agency (CIDA), the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and John McCain's International Republican Institute financed a whole panoply of Haitian francs tireurs, pimps and wannabe-presidents and face-card NGOs to support the programme of the elites which was simply to grab back from the Haitian people the Universal Human Rights promulgated 200 years earlier for the first time on Earth by Jean Jacques Dessalines and the other illustrious fathers and mothers of the Haitian Revolution." (Common Sense, "Canada's Bloody Hands" - April 19, 2009). This is the juncture where things get really tricky. It would appear to me that a people who fought for their freedom incessantly, for 300 years, and finally won it 200 years ago deserve to be accorded considerable respect. Moreso, because they fought as slaves, entrapped and circumscribed by the system itself and despite this, defeated three of the world's most powerful armies, one of them twice. They are the only people in history to have broken their shackles themselves. Spartacus who tried valiantly but failed is revered as a European hero. Bouckman, Toussaint and Dessalines are ignored by the same historians. It is not so odd: TIME recognised Margaret Thatcher but not Fidel Castro as a revolutionary.
    Those Haitians whose savagery, indiscipline and general lawlessness the western "press" celebrated in slavering anticipation failed to show. The Haitians who survived behaved as those who know them expected: patient, disciplined, and displaying an exemplary solidarity, sharing their crusts while starving.
    It was these same people who declared universal emancipation and universal human rights two centuries ago and who have told anyone who wants to listen that they know what they want and who they want to lead them and speak for them.
    They know how to develop their nation, if only, for the first time at last, they are allowed to do what they want. They need help, but help on their own terms. They want work, real work, not plastic 'jobs' in freezone sweatshops.
    They want to go back to feeding themselves. They want to be complete Haitians again; the people who helped Bolivar liberate South America.
    The world needs to get out of the way. France, the United States and Canada owe the Haitians billions in damages. It is not for them to tell the Haitians what to spend it on. France used Haitian money to conquer Algeria. Haitians want that money to conquer child hunger and maternal mortality. If the General Assembly wants to prove its worth, it should move quickly to take the Haitian initiative away from the clueless and overtaxed Security Council. The Assembly can -- guided by the Haitians and with the expert help of Cuba, Venezuela, South Africa, Kerala (India), Brazil, China and other parts of the developing world -- map out an agenda and organise help from wherever it is available without strings. The object is not to defend Miami Beach but to protect the vital interests of the Haitians, and, by extension, the vital interests of humanity.
    And if anyone wants to know what to do right now: Land 10 thousand wheelbarrows on the streets and hand them over to neighbourhood groups. Let the groups decide how they are going to move the rubble and what they are going to do with it. Give the groups money and supplies to set up 10 thousand street kitchens, say about $200 a group. Let the groups pay the wheelbarrow men if necessary. In three weeks the casual journalist would be hard put to find any of the 'usual' stories. Total cost: $2 million, plus $1 million for wheelbarrows. Meanwhile, the UN can be assembling a real security force to protect the Haitians and particularly their president, and under his direction, design and install the apparatus allowing Haitians to run their own country and to make their own mistakes, for the first time at last.
    jankunnu@yahoo.com
    Copyright © 2010 John Maxwell
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment


    • #3
      RACE AND CLASS IN CUBA - PART 2
      BY Gayle McGarrity
      Sunday, January 31, 2010
      In the last decade, more and more tourists have gone to Cuba, not only to enjoy tropical beaches and cabarets, but to explore Afro-Cuban culture. This is laudable, as the cabarets were other places in which racism was blatant. It is amazing how Americans, both black and white, who are so critical of a phenomenon like blackface when it is found in the United States do not criticise it when they see it at Tropicana (the most prestigious Havana cabaret). When I expressed my dismay in 1981, I was told that it was not racist, but rather just an example of Cuban culture. This is just what white Southerners in the US said when they were criticised in the 1950s and 1960s for segregationist practices.
      As the tourists are now quite interested in the black population and its cultural expressions, blacks have become quite in fashion. Police no longer harass people sporting dreadlocks as much, and foreigners are not steered away from aspects of black Cuban culture like rumba and Santeria, to the extent that they were when I lived there. Darker-skinned women are not harassed for consorting with foreigners to the same extent, but as with so much else in Cuba, the policy changes from day to day. One day, state security can be seen finding girls and boys for tourists' sexual pleasure, some of them very young; a few weeks later there will be a crackdown on jineterismo and offenders will be systematically rounded up.
      When I was living there and the dollar was prohibited for all Cubans, some santeros -- traditional practitioners of African religion -- charged foreigners only in dollars. The practice led me to question whether or not the African deities were only concerned with the welfare of those who had divisas (foreign exchange). One of the great contradictions of the Cuban system is that all Cubans are by no means equal. Those who are in superior positions in the party and government have more privileges.
      MCGARRITY... I do believe that feelings of inferiority are being erased to a small degree
      1/1
      At the time when I was living and travelling to Cuba (during the 70s, 80s and 90s), only those Cubans who were high up in the party could enter the diplotiendas -- diplomatic stores -- and travel abroad. Now, there is a complicated system through which Cubans can travel if they are sponsored. This involves considerable expense and paying fees, but at least it gives ordinary Cubans a chance to see the outside world. As more and more Cubans take advantage of this, so do more and more black and brown Cubans. I have not yet had a chance to study the extent to which these new possibilities have altered the system by which mostly white Cubans sent remittances to their families back home, thus increasing their purchasing power and standard of living. I suspect, however, that the fact that more non-whites are travelling and sending money and coming back with increased financial resources may have somewhat increased their social status.
      In fact, I have been motivated to write this article by the words of a black Cuban supporter of the Revolution, Esteban Morales . The latter, in a statement refuting what an influential group of 60 African-Americans were saying about the government's failure to protect the civil rights of blacks on the island, claimed that many blacks lived in inferior situations because they did not know how to transform their situation. "No saben como aprovecharse de las oportunidades que la Revolucion les ha dado" (They don't know how to take advantage of the opportunities provided by the Revolution). My position is that the blacks are perfectly able to take advantage of opportunities when they are presented to them. I know too many well-educated blacks, particularly those who studied languages and other careers connected to the tourist sector who have been unemployed for years. It is a well-known fact that the best jobs, in fact almost all of the jobs in the tourist sector, are reserved for whites. When I was visiting the island frequently in the 90s, the argument was that white Cubans had to limit the number of non-whites in the tourist sector because the Spaniards and other Europeans did not like to see them. I would argue quite the contrary, that it is white Cubans who do not want to see them.
      A Race-Class structure under White Marxist Paternalism
      While apologists for the Revolution claim that most black Cubans support the Revolution, during my years of contact with the society, I have not found that they do to a lesser or greater extent than other Cubans. As in all systems, those who stand to gain from the system support it. Those who continue to live in dilapidated homes, who suffer from discrimination in jobs and education, who form the majority in the prisons, who are noticeably absent from local television and are the brunt of most jokes, obviously expected more from the Revolution. Of course, when they begin to protest, they are told that things are much worse in the United States and, if they complain, they are playing into the hands of US imperialism.
      As regards class distinctions, I have previously referred to the present government´s declared commitment to socialism, or Marxism-Leninism. I would suggest that what actually exists is state capitalism. The basic tenet of socialism is that the masses, that is the peasants and workers, should control the state apparatus. The profits created in the economy should also accrue, to the greatest degree possible, to the previously disadvantaged. The government should ensure that the basic needs of all of the population are met. To confront the government on its own terms, I would ask then, where do the profits created by Cuban workers and peasants end up?
      There is no doubt that some goes to health, education and social services, but anyone who seriously analyses the society can see that there is clearly an elite class. Although we are asked to believe that these are representatives of the workers and peasants, and that this is why they are entitled to a higher standard of living, this is clearly not in keeping with the ideology of socialism. As this elite is disproportionately white, one could argue that the majority -- who are non- white -- labour to provide for the ´needs 'of the ruling white elite. It must be clarified that certainly not all whites are elite, but definitely almost all social - and it could be argued economic - elites are white.
      Apologists for those in power point to Juan Almeida, the only black who has maintained an elevated position in government, as proof that blacks in Cuba have power. However, these same individuals say that Colin Powell, former secretary of state of the United States, and President Barack Obama, both African-Americans, are just "puppets". Why is it that the proponents of the Revolution see the latter as mere figureheads, while Almeida is seen as being so powerful? Although Almeida is usually trotted out to receive foreign dignitaries from black countries, I would suggest that he has very little real power. In this regard, Cuba is essentially not much different from Brazil -- not all the poor are black, but virtually all of the rich are white.
      Turning once again to the terminology of the theory which those in power claim to be implementing and putting into practice, we must examine the concept of the superstructure. Supposedly the superstructure (that is the body of ideas, beliefs and practices) in a society is a reflection of the infrastructure (that is the economic system, the so-called relations of production). Racism then is seen as an ideology used in the past to justify economic systems like slavery, colonialism and capitalism. I would argue that racism in Cuba today is also used to support an economic system. If the majority of the citizens actually believe that they are inferior and that whites are supposed to be in control (either because they had an enhanced role in the Revolution, or simply because that is just the way the world is), then they are less likely to rebel.
      I do believe that feelings of inferiority are being erased to a small degree, but not because of anything that the government is doing. The fact that many of the ideas which lead to enhanced self-esteem among blacks come from abroad, does not in any way make these ideas ´foreign' ideas which run counter to Cuban culture. Ideas of Marxism-Leninism also came from abroad, and they were supposedly embraced almost without condition. The international black Movement is enriched by contributions from throughout Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, North America, Europe and Oceania.
      As I have stated above, I do not believe that ideas emanating from many of the proponents of this movement are sufficient to transform societies for the good of all. However, particularly for those of African descent, I do believe that they are important precursors. One cannot build a society free of class and racial oppression if the majority, both those who perpetuate and those who suffer from racism, really believe in white superiority.
      The racial propaganda of the Cuban regime
      In Cuba, as I have implied above, racism and discrimination are linked to lynching and dogs being set on peaceful demonstrators. The fact that blacks are the brunt of most jokes is not considered racism. The fact that most white Cuban men cringe at the thought that a white woman might have sexual relations with a non-white man is not considered racism. The fact that the participation of blacks in world history, and more particularly in Cuban history, is left out of textbooks is not considered racism. The fact that African phenotype (like kinky hair, broad nose and big lips) is largely regarded with contempt, is not considered racism. The fact that the most deteriorated residential areas are where the majority of blacks live, is not considered racism. The fact that Fidel always refers to his Spanish father and never to his light-skinned mulata mother is not considered racism.
      Those who take exception to the petition by the African-Americans to which I referred above, claim that the Revolutionary government cannot be accused of racism as it helped defeat apartheid and colonialism in Southern Africa, sent doctors and other professionals to work in underdeveloped nations and has allowed students from many black countries to study free of charge on the Isle of Youth.
      It is not clear whether or not the present Cuban government provided assistance to liberation movements and governments in Africa for purely altruistic reasons, or because of geo-political considerations. Helping to train cadres in these countries has done much to secure support for the Cuban revolution in international fora like the United Nations. Just because doctors and other professionals go to work in black countries does not mean that they do not have racist ideas. Many of those who went abroad, either as military personnel or as professionals, and with whom I spoke in Cuba, expressed great resentment that they had to go there. Albeit, many of the professionals did not object, as they received consumer goods, like cars and electrical appliances, and often improved housing, when they returned.
      Some assert that Armando Hart Dávalos, who was minister of culture for far too long, is not racist and Eurocentric because he allowed black musicians to travel and even live abroad and to return when they liked, in contrast with earlier policies that made it impossible for those who left to come back. First of all, the main reason that he allowed musicians, not only black ones, to go in and out is that the government has been very embarrassed by the number of 'cultural workers' who have defected while away on foreign trips. Secondly, his cultural policies have always been very Eurocentric. There is no comparison between the way that the Conjunto Folkorico, which is largely but not exclusively Afro-Cuban in orientation, has historically been treated, and the way that the Ballet Nacional has been nurtured. The Director of the National Ballet, Alicia Alonso, was criticised some years ago for not having any dark- skinned dancers in her group. She apparently reluctantly relented.
      Racism coexisting with Socialism?
      In conclusion, Cuba is not the only racist country in Latin America. The kinds of manifestations of white superiority that are discussed here are by no means exclusive to Cuba. We could be talking about Brazil, Venezuela, Dominican Republic or Colombia. But Cuba is the only country in this hemisphere which has had a successful revolution that has claimed to be dedicated to eradicating social and economic injustices and inequality.
      I will never forget when I presented a paper on Racism as a Public Health Problem in the Americas, at a conference on Social Sciences and Medicine in Caracas in 1995: I was interrupted and reprimanded after only five minutes of the 20 minutes allotted. I was told by the outraged chair of the conference that racism was only a reality in the United States. It was unknown in Latin America. As I talked about subjects like the ways in which white elites abandoned their mixed-race offspring, who often grew up resentful and disenfranchised, the cheeks of the almost exclusively white male participants grew crimson. The exact same kind of reaction is occurring now, at the end of 2009, when a brave group of African-American intellectuals dare to protest manifestations of racism, epitomised by the unjust arrest and detention of a mulato activist on the island. In a response by black Cuban intellectuals, identified with the government, we are told that these Americans have no right to comment on race relations on the island because the United States is the most racist country in the world, and Obama only became president by denying his ´blackness´. The fact that African-Americans live in a racist society is no reason that they cannot criticise racism in other countries, just as members of this group of intellectuals have always done at home. As I emphasised throughout this article, we expect more from a Revolutionary process than from societies that are unabashedly capitalist. The fact that unconditional defenders of the Revolution fall back on the old tired accusation that those who criticise anything about Cuba, even in a spirit of constructive criticism, are agents of imperialism, is lamentable.
      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Eye popping , mind blowing articles.
        THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

        "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


        "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

        Comment

        Working...
        X